Plasmalogens Week #2 – Childhood Development

Continuing Plasmalogens Week with three 2025 papers, starting with a human study of plasmalogens’ effects of decreasing breastfed infants’ infections and inflammation:

“Mothers reported on breastfeeding and infant infections in questionnaires collected at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months post-birth. Parent-reported infection burden was defined as the total number of infant respiratory tract infections, gastroenteritis, conjunctivitis, and acute otitis media episodes reported by mothers between birth and 6 months for 6-month analyses, and between birth and 12 months for 12-month analyses.

We constructed a causal mediation model to estimate the proportion of effects explained by a direct effect of breastfeeding on inflammation, measured via glycoprotein acetyls (GlycA)—the average direct effect (ADE)—and the proportion that was mediated by metabolomic biomarkers/lipid—the average causal mediation effect (ACME).

Breastfeeding is negatively associated with GlycA, positively associated with plasmalogens, and plasmalogens are negatively associated with GlycA. However, the positive association between breastfeeding and plasmalogens is stronger than the negative direct association between breastfeeding and inflammation, resulting in an ACME that exceeds the total effect. This pattern indicates that plasmalogens may play a dominant role in mediating the relationship between breastfeeding and systemic inflammation.

We have recently developed a plasmalogen score that is associated with a range of cardiometabolic outcomes, including type 2 diabetes and CVD.

  • At 6 months, the plasmalogen score was estimated to mediate 162% of the total effect (proportion mediated: 1.62, i.e. average causal mediation effect (ACME) to total effect ratio of 1.62, resulting in a percentage > 100%) of breastfeeding on GlycA.
  • At 12 months, the plasmalogen score mediated an estimated 75% of the total effect of breastfeeding on GlycA.

Any breastfeeding, regardless of supplementary feeding, was associated with lower inflammation, fewer infections, and significant, potentially beneficial changes in metabolomic and lipidomic markers, particularly plasmalogens. There was evidence of bidirectional mediation: metabolomic biomarkers and lipids mediated breastfeeding’s effects on inflammation, while inflammation partly mediated breastfeeding’s impact on certain metabolites and lipids.”

https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-025-04343-0 “The protective effect of breastfeeding on infant inflammation: a mediation analysis of the plasma lipidome and metabolome”

Reference 48 was the 2024 plasmalogen score study.


A second study by many of the first study’s researchers used the same cohort as the first study to investigate effects of maternal obesity on infant obesity:

“We aimed to investigate associations between maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (pp-BMI), lipidomic profiles of mothers, human milk, and infants, and early life growth. We were particularly interested in ether lipids as they are higher in breastfed infants compared to formula-fed infants, are enriched in human milk compared to infant formula, and are involved in metabolic health and inflammation in adult populations.

Maternal plasmalogen score was negatively associated with pp-BMI and positively associated with plasmalogens in human milk and infant plasmalogen scores from birth to four years of age. We were unable to establish clear links between plasmalogen score and infant BMI within the first 4 years.

These findings position plasmalogens and ether lipids as potential biomarkers or intervention targets for reducing transmission of obesity from mother to infant. Optimising lipid profiles through reducing maternal pp-BMI and dietary or supplemental ether lipids may represent a novel strategy for mitigating early-life obesity risk.”

https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-7089146/v1 “Maternal BMI and infant obesity risk: a lipidomics perspective on the developmental origins of obesity”

There was a lot of hand waving and weasel-wording (i.e., could, may, potential, associated with) but little causal evidence in this preprint. Reference 42 was the preprint version of the first study.


A third paper investigated 9- to 12-year-olds’ plasmalogen levels and molecular types:

“The importance of plasmalogens (Pls) in several cellular processes is known, one of which is their protective effect against oxidative damage. The physiological role of Pls in human development has not been elucidated. This study is the first report on plasmalogen levels and molecular types in children’s plasma.

Ethanolamine plasmalogen (PlsEtn 16:0/20:5) and choline plasmalogen (PlsCho 16:0/20:5), both carrying eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, ω-3), were significantly lower in girls than in boys. There was no significant difference observed among the 9, 10, 11, and 12-year-old groups between girls and boys in their levels of PlsEtn 16:0/20:5. However, a significant decrease in the levels of PlsCho 16:0/20:5 was observed for 9, 10 and 12-year-old groups of girls compared to boys.

  • In both sexes, the plasmalogen levels for the 12-year-old children were lower than those for the 9-year-old children.
  • PlsCho (16:0/18:2) linoleic acid (ω-6)-derived was lower in the overweight children than in the normal-weight children for both sexes.
  • Arachidonic acid (ω-6)-containing PlsEtn (18:0/20:4) was the most abundant ethanolamine-type plasmalogen in both sexes.

This study has many limitations as follows:

  1. Non-fasting plasma samples were collected from the children’s plasma and used for analysis; since diet can influence Pls levels, the result may be affected by the sample collection method.
  2. Physical activity was also not monitored, which could have an influence on plasma levels, and
  3. A limited number of plasmalogen molecular species were quantified in this study.

A follow-up study may be essential to determine the plasma Pls in the same population when they are adolescents.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/15/6/743 “Application of Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Quantitative Analysis of Plasmalogens in Preadolescent Children—The Hokkaido Study”


Plasmalogens Week #1 – Overview

It’s been a while since I curated plasmalogen papers. Let’s start out a week’s worth of 2025 papers with a review of plasmalogens as biomarkers:

“Reduced levels of plasmalogens in circulation or in cell membranes are associated with rare peroxisomal disorders, systemic disease, neurological impairment, cancer, and diseases of the heart, kidney, and liver. Roles for plasmalogens have been identified in lipid rafts, myelin, chlorolipids, bromolipids, hemostasis, cholesterol metabolism, and redox responses.

Plasmalogens account for approximately 5-20% of the phospholipids in mammalian cell membranes. Circulating choline and ethanolamine are incorporated into lipid membranes through the synthesis of plasmalogens. These lipids are formed through a separate multistep process involving precursors in the cytoplasm, peroxisome, and endoplasmic reticulum.

Cytochrome c (cyt-c) typically serves as an electron carrier in the mitochondrial membrane, but under oxidative stress, cyt-c undergoes a conformational alteration conferring peroxidase activity that cleaves the vinyl-ether linkage in plasmalogens. Plasmalogens may act as precursors to platelet-activating factor (PAF), and PAF can be enzymatically converted to plasmalogens. PAF is a potent pro-inflammatory mediator in cancer, cardiovascular, neurological, chronic and infectious disease, suggesting that increased PAF levels may inversely correspond to lower ethanolamine plasmalogen levels identified in human diseases.

Plasmalogens are abundant in myelin, and crucial to the function of central nervous system oligodendrocytes and peripheral nervous system Schwann cells in supporting neuronal action potential.

Catabolism of plasmalogens occurs in response to oxidative stress and activation of TLRs, which promote pro-inflammatory responses during disease progression. Release of fatty acids (e.g., arachidonic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid, docosahexaenoic acid) during plasmalogen catabolism can either exacerbate or resolve pro-inflammatory and thrombotic responses depending on the type of fatty acid released and mediator produced.

Continued research of the types of plasmalogens and plasmalogen precursors and their natural or synthetic sources, the frequency and amount of plasmalogens administered, the route of administration, and the timing of treatment is needed.”

https://www.jlr.org/article/S0022-2275(25)00188-9/fulltext “Plasmalogens as biomarkers and therapeutic targets”


A second review highlighted various strategies for regulating plasmalogen levels:

“Plasmalogens serve as significant structural components of cellular membranes, particularly enriched in tissues with high membrane trafficking. Plasmalogens are recognized as major reservoirs for polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), notably docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (AA). Incorporation of these PUFAs influences membrane physical properties, including fluidity and the propensity to form non-lamellar structures.

Effective delivery of plasmalogens or their precursors faces significant hurdles, including chemical instability (especially oxidation of the vinyl-ether bond), low oral bioavailability, and challenges in crossing biological barriers like the blood–brain barrier (BBB). Exploration of plasmalogen-based nanoparticles is currently quite limited.”

https://faseb.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1096/fba.2025-00010 “Plasmalogen as a Bioactive Lipid Drug: From Preclinical Research Challenges to Opportunities in Nanomedicine”

Yeah, no. Everything the public was told about lipid nanoparticles this decade was propaganda in service of an agenda. The real stories are gathered in papers I haven’t curated, such as Lipid Nanoparticles as Active Biointerfaces: From Membrane Interaction to Systemic Dysregulation.


Combining exercise with sulforaphane

A 2025 clinical trial with old people compared NRF2 effects of acute exercise with pre- and post-exercise sulforaphane treatment:

“This study tested the hypothesis that combining acute exercise (in vivo stimulus) with ex vivo sulforaphane (SFN) treatment would induce greater NRF2 activation and signaling in older adults compared to either treatment alone. This approach was used to bypass the potential issue of inter-individual variability in metabolism and bioavailability of SFN supplementation through oral consumption and thereby provide more rigorous biological control to establish mechanistic feasibility.

Twenty-five older adults (12 men, 13 women; mean age: 67 ± 5 years) performed 30-min cycling exercise. Blood was drawn before and immediately after exercise to isolate peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and incubate with and without SFN (5 μM) treatment.

Acute exercise induced modest transcriptional changes across the four tested transcripts compared to the robust upregulation elicited by SFN. This disparity was notable given the comparable NRF2/ARE binding activity observed between EX and SFN.

Near-significant trends were observed for EX in heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), and glutathione reductase (GR) (after Bonferroni correction), while glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit (GCLC) was not induced by EX. In contrast, SFN alone robustly induced expression of NQO1, HO-1, GR, and GCLC.

We had chosen 5 μM as the dose based on pilot data from our laboratory and existing literature from in vitro experiments. However, typically, SFN is not combined with another stimulus.

To test this speculation, we ran a post hoc dose–response experiment where we stimulated PBMCs (n = 5) at six different SFN concentrations ranging from 0 to 20 μM (incubated for 5 h) and analyzed responses across the four genes used in the present study. The dose responses displayed hormetic curves for NQO1, GR, and GCLC, with 5 μM eliciting the peak response, suggesting that the lack of difference between SFN and the combined treatment was due to a ceiling effect of the SFN dose. Interestingly, HO-1 displayed a linear/curvilinear response with the maximal observed response at 20 μM.

In future ex vivo studies, a sulforaphane concentration of 1–2 μM in combination with acute exercise is predicted to enhance the expression of these antioxidant genes in the PBMCs of older adults to a greater extent than either treatment alone. Furthermore, lower SFN plasma concentrations are more likely to be achievable with oral supplementation.

To our knowledge, this is the first trial to measure responses to acute exercise combined with sulforaphane stimulation on NRF2 signaling in older men and women. We did not observe any statistically significant differences in any of our outcome variables between men and women.

Our results demonstrate that combining acute exercise with a sulforaphane stimulus elicits a greater response in nuclear NRF2 activity in older adults. While the response in gene expression did not completely mirror the response in NRF2 activation, it is important to note that NRF2 induces hundreds of cytoprotective genes. The four transcripts we measured are among those most commonly used to represent NRF2 signaling but do not capture the full picture. Full transcriptomics in future studies would address this question.”

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11357-025-01939-5 “Sulforaphane improves exercise-induced NRF2 signaling in older adults: an in vivo-ex vivo approach” (not freely available) Thanks to Dr. Tinna Traustadóttir for providing a copy.


I asked two questions, and will follow up with replies:

  1. Did a second experiment test effects of these subjects eating broccoli sprouts prior to acute exercise? The clinical trial’s NCT04848792 Study Overview section indicated that was the researchers’ intent.
  2. What studies have the data that produced this study’s graphical abstract’s younger vs. older NRF2 response graph?

Ancient DNA fragments enable adult neurogenesis

A 2025 rodent study investigated mechanisms by which erythropoietin (EPO) enables adult neurogenesis and cognitive function:

“We mapped epigenomic and transcriptional landscapes of adult mouse hippocampus under recombinant human EPO (rhEPO) treatment. We discovered significant lineage-specific remodelling of chromatin accessibility predominantly in newly formed pyramidal neurons, highlighting a robust EPO-driven neurogenic response. Notably, transposable elements (TEs), particularly ancient LINEs and SINEs, emerged as critical cis-regulatory elements (cCREs).

EPO is known to be upregulated in the brain under hypoxic or injury conditions, and it has been considered a natural neuroprotective agent. We demonstrated that EPO, a traditionally hematopoietic hormone, can profoundly reprogram the adult neural epigenome to drive neurogenesis.

EPO may activate a specific subclass of dormant regulatory elements to drive nearby genes. Such a mechanism would represent a previously unappreciated mode of gene regulation: the de novo recruitment of ancient genomic elements to drive a contemporary cellular response.

Our data support the model that EPO drives differentiation of progenitors rather than inducing widespread cell division. The net effect is an enrichment of pyramidal neurons at the cost of interneurons. Pyramidal neurons integrate in the hippocampal circuitry, leading to potential implications for mood, memory, cognitive enhancement, and recovery from brain injury.

We propose a conserved evolutionary mechanism at play: ancient TEs embedded in the genome have been repurposed as cCREs in neural cells, and during an EPO-induced neurogenic stimulus, the brain taps into this reservoir of regulatory elements to rapidly reshape gene expression. In evolutionary terms, this represents an efficient strategy.”

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.10.13.682070v1.full “Transposable Element-Mediated Epigenomic Remodeling Drives Erythropoietin-Induced Neurogenesis in the Adult Hippocampus”


Activating Nrf2 pathways with sunlight

A 2025 review subject was non-electrophilic Nrf2 activators:

“NRF2 can be induced via:

  1. Non-specific electrophile/ROS generation,
  2. Disruption of the NRF2–KEAP1 protein–protein interaction,
  3. Autophagy-mediated KEAP1 degradation,
  4. Direct modulation of NRF2 protein stability, and
  5. Post-transcriptional/post-translational modifications.

Except for a single intervention, therapeutic hypothermia, every non-pharmacological strategy with defined mechanisms employs more than one of these routes, most frequently pairing post-translational modification with either protein-stability regulation or limited electrophile production. This combinatorial activation elevates both NRF2 abundance and transcriptional competence while minimizing the liabilities of purely electrophilic agents and circumventing the efficacy limitations.

Classical electrophilic NRF2 activators, despite potent activation potential, exhibit paradoxically reduced therapeutic efficacy relative to single antioxidants, attributable to concurrent oxidative stress generation, glutathione depletion, mitochondrial impairment, and systemic toxicity. Although emerging non-electrophilic pharmacological activators offer therapeutic potential, their utility remains limited by bioavailability and suboptimal potency.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/14/9/1047 “Non-Electrophilic Activation of NRF2 in Neurological Disorders: Therapeutic Promise of Non-Pharmacological Strategies”


These researchers exaggerated problems of electrophilic Nrf2 activators such as “mitochondrial impairment, and systemic toxicity” so they could have something to write about. Just like every intervention, the dose determines the response. I can’t imagine not eating broccoli sprouts in favor of brain zapping with electroconvulsive therapy or transcranial magnetic stimulation just to avoid sulforaphane’s temporary mild oxidative stress that activates Nrf2 for 15-20 minutes.

But there are limitations to how an unwell person can benefit from Nrf2 activation. For example, I haven’t curated many cancer papers because healthy body functioning can’t be assumed.

I walk the beach at sunrise, weather permitting, because it makes me feel good, and I’m always happy afterwards that I made the effort to get outside. That doing so combines two of the above non-electrophilic Nrf2 activators, physical exercise and photobiomodulation, hasn’t been a consideration.

These reviewers didn’t include human studies of sunlight’s effects. Nevermind that hospitals used to have sundecks for patients, and John Ott published relevant human and animal studies over fifty years ago.


Many studies have an undisclosed limitation in that they were performed without controlling for light. For example, knowing that mitochondria are light-activated, I don’t trust those studies’ in vivo, ex vivo, or in vitro results.

None of the 100 most recent 2025 photobiomodulation papers examined natural sunlight. Maybe it wouldn’t sell red light, green light, and blue light lasers and other products to show that people could produce the same effects themselves with sunlight at different times of the day? Would researchers damage their reputations to study a freely-available intervention, one where they don’t “do something”?

Glucosinolate and isothiocyanate human interventions

A 2025 review covered human evidence from glucosinolate and isothiocyanate research through April 2025:

“Glucosinolates (GSLs) and their breakdown products, isothiocyanates (ITCs), are biogenesis compounds with anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticancer properties, mediated through key pathways such as Nrf2, NF‐κB, and epigenetic regulation. However, their limited and variable bioavailability remains a key challenge. This review summarises the current clinical evidence on GSLs and ITCs, with a focus on their health effects and metabolic fate in humans.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/14/16/2876 “Bioavailability, Human Metabolism, and Dietary Interventions of Glucosinolates and Isothiocyanates: Critical Insights and Future Perspectives”


In the above graphic, notice how the inactive myrosinase column has no small intestine participation, but the active myrosinase column does. This point wasn’t adequately emphasized, that for complete effects, an individual has to do whatever they can to thoroughly chew or otherwise activate myrosinase to hydrolyze glucosinolates before swallowing.

Researchers don’t rely on individuals taking responsibility for their own health, of course. Just swallow these pills, we’ll do it for you, as if humans are lab rats. This lack of emphasis is understandable, if not optimal.

This review provided longish coverage of studies, which is preferable to the usual treatment of citing a reference without much explanation. Compare, for example, my longish curation of the 2023 Eat broccoli sprouts for your high intensity interval training with its reference 68 summary below:

“Another study investigated the effects of consuming GSL-rich broccoli sprout (GRS) supplements on oxidative stress and physiological adaptations to intense exercise training. In a randomised, double-blind, crossover design, nine healthy participants consumed either a GRS supplement (75 g of sprouts) or a placebo twice daily over a 7-day high-intensity interval training period. The findings revealed that GRS supplementation significantly reduced markers of oxidative stress, including carbonylated proteins in skeletal muscle and plasma myeloperoxidase levels, compared to the placebo condition. Furthermore, GRS intake led to reduced lactate accumulation during submaximal exercise and enhanced exercise performance, as indicated by a longer time to exhaustion during maximal exercise tests. At the molecular level, supplementation with GRS was associated with elevated Nrf2 protein levels in muscle tissue, suggesting activation of endogenous antioxidant defence mechanisms. In addition, GRS intake mitigated nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes and lowered average blood glucose levels, indicating improved glucose regulation during intense training. Collectively, these results suggest that GRS supplementation may enhance physiological adaptations to high-intensity exercise by reducing oxidative stress and supporting metabolic homeostasis.”


Get a little stress into your life, Part 2

A 2025 reply to a letter to the editor cited 56 references to elaborate on Part 1 and related topics:

“A positive effect does not necessarily mean benefit, and positive effects on individual organisms may mean adverse effects on other coexisting organisms. However, a vast literature shows that hormetic stimulation can result in benefits depending on the context, for instance, clear growth, yield, and survival improvement.

There is some energetic cost to support hormetic stimulation, with a likely positive energy budget, which might also have negative consequences if there is insufficient energy substrate, especially under concurrent severe environmental challenges. Moreover, hormetic preconditioning could be particularly costly when there is a mismatch between the predicted environment and the actual environment the same individuals or their offspring might face in the future.

Hormesis should not be unilaterally linked to positive and beneficial effects without considering dose levels. For any research to answer the question of whether a stimulation represents hormesis and whether it is beneficial, robust dose–response evaluations are needed, which should be designed a priori for this purpose, meeting the requirements of the proper number, increment, and range of doses.

Both additivity and synergism are possible in the hormetic stimulatory zone, depending also on the duration of exposure and the relative ratio of different components. This might happen, for example, when a chemical primes stress pathways (e.g., heat shock proteins and antioxidants), thus enabling another chemical to trigger hormesis (defense cross-activation) and/or because combined low subtoxicity may modulate receptors (e.g., aryl hydrocarbon receptor and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2) differently than individual exposures (receptor binding synergy).

Moreover, even when stimulation occurs in the presence of individual components, stimulation may no longer be present when combined, and therefore, effects of mixtures cannot be accurately predicted based on the effects of individual components. There may be hormesis trade-offs; hormesis should be judged based on fitness-critical end points.

While often modeled mathematically, hormesis is fundamentally a dynamic biological process and should not be seen as a purely mathematical function, certainly not a linear one. Much remains to be learned about the role of hormesis in global environmental change, and an open mind is needed to not miss the forest for the trees.”

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c05892 “Correspondence on ‘Hormesis as a Hidden Hand in Global Environmental Change?’ A Reply”


Reference 38 was a 2024 paper cited for:

“Hormetic-based interventions, particularly priming (or preconditioning), do not weaken organisms but strengthen them, enhancing their performance and health under different environmental challenges, which are often more massive than the priming exposure.

The catabolic aspect of hormesis is primarily protective whereas the anabolic aspect promotes growth, and their integration could optimize performance and health. The concept of preconditioning has also gained widespread attention in biomedical sciences.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1568163724004069 “The catabolic – anabolic cycling hormesis model of health and resilience” (not freely available)


Reference 40 was a 2021 review that characterized hormesis as a hallmark of health:

“Health is usually defined as the absence of pathology. Here, we endeavor to define health as a compendium of organizational and dynamic features that maintain physiology.

Biological causes or hallmarks of health include features of:

  • Spatial compartmentalization (integrity of barriers and containment of local perturbations),
  • Maintenance of homeostasis over time (recycling and turnover, integration of circuitries, and rhythmic oscillations), and
  • An array of adequate responses to stress (homeostatic resilience, hormetic regulation, and repair and regeneration).

Disruption of any of these interlocked features is broadly pathogenic, causing an acute or progressive derailment of the system.

A future ‘medicine of health’ might detect perilous trajectories to intercept them by targeted interventions well before the traditional ‘medicine of disease’ comes into action.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867420316068 “Hallmarks of Health”


Betaine as an exercise mimetic

A 2025 human study investigated effects of long-term exercise:

“Exercise has well-established health benefits, yet its molecular underpinnings remain incompletely understood. We conducted an integrated multi-omics analysis to compare effects of acute vs. long-term exercise in healthy males.

Acute exercise induced transient responses, whereas repeated exercise triggered adaptive changes, notably reducing cellular senescence and inflammation and enhancing betaine metabolism. Exercise-driven betaine enrichment, partly mediated by renal biosynthesis, exerts geroprotective effects and rescues age-related health decline in mice.

Betaine binds to and inhibits TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1), retarding the kinetics of aging.

Betaine effectively alleviated senescence phenotypes by reduced senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-Gal)-positive cells, decreased p21 expression, lowered DNA damage indicator γ-H2A.X, and elevated heterochromatin mark H3K9me3. Betaine treatment also enhanced cellular antioxidant capacity, as evidenced by increased NRF2 phosphorylation and reduced ROS accumulation.

These findings systematically elucidate the molecular benefits of exercise, and position betaine as an exercise mimetic for healthy aging.”

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2025.06.001 “Systematic profiling reveals betaine as an exercise mimetic for geroprotection” (not freely available) Thanks to Dr. Weimin Ci for providing a copy.


Eat broccoli sprouts for your eyes, Part 3

Two 2025 papers cited Precondition your defenses with broccoli sprouts, starting with a review of age-related macular degeneration:

“AMD progression from intermediate to late AMD leads to a point of irreversible retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) degeneration where treatment becomes worthless. Treating patients at the early/intermediate stages presents a better therapeutic window opportunity for AMD as the disease could potentially be prevented or slowed down.

Strong evidence points to RPE dysfunction at these stages, mainly through redox imbalance and lysosomal dysfunction in RPE oxidative injury. Restoring oxidative balance and lysosomal function may act as preventive and therapeutic measures against RPE dysfunction and degeneration.

Due to interaction with KEAP1, NRF2 is a ubiquitously expressed protein with a high turnover and half-life of about 20 minutes. Because the turnover of NRF2 is faster than KEAP1, newly synthesized NRF2 does not have free KEAP1 to bind and is translocated into the nucleus. Once in the nucleus, NRF2 dimerizes with sMAF and the complex binds to antioxidant response element (ARE) sequences, promoting the expression of ARE genes.

There is NRF2 involvement in most of the hallmarks of aging. Key transcriptional regulatory factors of related pathways, such as transcription factor EB (TFEB) and NRF2, may be targeted to restore homeostasis and/or prevent further RPE degeneration.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/14/5/596 “Targeting Lysosomal Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress in Age-Related Macular Degeneration”

There were other informative tidbits throughout this review, such as:

  • “Anti-inflammatory effects of most electrophilic NRF2 activators are thought to be at least partly NRF2-independent, suggesting that these compounds lacking specificity may be advantageous for multitargeted pathologies.
  • TFEB can activate NRF2 under conditions devoid of oxidative stress.”

This paper also cited Bridging Nrf2 and autophagy when discussing the above graphic.


In this human cell and rodent study, several coauthors of the original 2020 study tested sulforaphane and TFEB interactions for ameliorating effects of a rare disease:

“Mutations in genes encoding lysosomal proteins could result in more than approximately 70 different lysosomal storage disorders. Niemann–Pick disease type C (NPC) is a rare lysosomal storage disorder caused by mutation in either NPC1 or NPC2 gene. Deficiency in NPC1 or NPC2 protein results in late endosomal/lysosomal accumulation of unesterified cholesterol.

Clinical symptoms of NPC include hepatosplenomegaly, progressive neurodegeneration, and central nervous system dysfunction, that is, seizure, motor impairment, and decline of intellectual function. So far there is no FDA-approved specific therapy for NPC.

Under stress conditions, that is, starvation or oxidative stress, TFEB is dephosphorylated and actively translocates into the nucleus, promoting expression of genes associated with lysosome and autophagy. TFEB overexpression or activation results in increased number of lysosomes, autophagy flux, and exocytosis.

Pharmacological activation of TFEB by sulforaphane (SFN), a previously identified TFEB agonist, significantly promoted cholesterol clearance in human and mouse NPC cells, while genetic inhibition (KO) of TFEB blocked SFN-induced cholesterol clearance. This clearance effect exerted by SFN was associated with upregulated lysosomal exocytosis and biogenesis. SFN treatment has no effect on the liver and spleen enlargement of Npc1 mice.

SFN is reportedly BBB-permeable, assuring a good candidate for efficient delivery to the brain, which is essential for targeting neurodegenerative phenotypes in neurological diseases including NPC. This is the first time that SFN was shown to directly activate TFEB in the brain.

Collectively, our results demonstrated that pharmacological activation of TFEB by a small-molecule agonist can mitigate NPC neuropathological symptoms in vivo. TFEB may be a putative target for NPC treatment, and manipulating lysosomal function via small-molecule TFEB agonists may have broad therapeutic potential for NPC.”

https://elifesciences.org/articles/103137 “Small-molecule activation of TFEB alleviates Niemann–Pick disease type C via promoting lysosomal exocytosis and biogenesis”


Eat broccoli sprouts to alleviate diabetic heart disease

A 2025 rodent study investigated sulforaphane’s effects on diabetic cardiomyopathy:

“The protective effect of cruciferae-derived sulforaphane (SFN) on diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) has garnered increasing attention. However, no studies have specifically explored its mechanistic involvement in cardiac substrate metabolism and mitochondrial function.

To address this gap, Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) db/db mice were orally gavaged with vehicle or 10 mg/kg body weight SFN every other day for 16 weeks, with vehicle-treated wild-type mice as controls. SFN intervention (SFN-I) alleviated hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, HOMA-IR, serum MDA levels, and liver inflammation. SFN-I improved the lipotoxicity-related phenotype of T2DM cardiomyopathy, manifested as attenuation of diastolic dysfunction, cardiac injury, fibrosis, lipid accumulation and peroxidation, ROS generation, and decreased mitochondrial complex I and II activities and ATP content.

Although not fully understood, multiple systemic and cardiac-local mechanisms contribute to DCM, encompassing hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance (IR), disturbances in cardiac substrate metabolism, lipotoxicity, glucotoxicity, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, inflammation, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. Nrf2 and its downstream metallothionein also mediated the preventive effect of SFN on DCM, and may underlie the synergistic effect of SFN and zinc in DCM.

These results suggest that chronic oral SFN-I protects against DCM by mitigating overall metabolic dysregulation and inhibiting cardiolipotoxicity. The latter might involve controlling cardiac fatty acid metabolism and improving mitochondrial function, rather than promoting glucose metabolism.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/14/5/603 “Oral Sulforaphane Intervention Protects Against Diabetic Cardiomyopathy in db/db Mice: Focus on Cardiac Lipotoxicity and Substrate Metabolism”


This study had numerous charts like the above showing it was better to not have a deviation from health (Ctrl) rather than incur injury (DCM) then try to fix it with sulforaphane (DCM + SFN). But the control group was wild-type mice, not mice genetically inclined to diabetes like the treatment groups.

The subjects’ starting points were at nine-weeks-old (equivalent to 18-25 year-old humans), and duration was 16 weeks. Grok 3 said: “A 25-week-old db/db mouse is roughly equivalent to a human aged 30–35 years chronologically, though its metabolic condition may mimic older human physiological states in diabetes and obesity research.”

A human equivalent of a 10 mg/kg sulforaphane dose is (.081 x 10 mg) = 56 mg orally administered every other day. That’s about how much total sulforaphane I estimated I took every day (52 mg) from Week 6 through Week 56 by eating microwaved broccoli sprouts twice daily.

No rationale was provided for the sulforaphane dose or the every-other-day dosing regimen. Since I took ~52 mg every day for almost a year, I’ll guess that this study may have had more definitive results with daily dosing. Or maybe add zinc per Zinc and broccoli sprouts – a winning combination.

Nrf2 activators and transcriptomic clocks

Two preprint studies looked at making transcriptional aging clocks using Nrf2 activators. Let’s start with a 2025 nematode study that used constant exposure to sulforaphane at different concentrations:

“To explore the potential of sulforaphane as a candidate natural compound for promoting longevity more generally, we tested the dose and age-specific effects of sulforaphane on C. elegans longevity, finding that it can extend lifespan by more than 50% at the most efficacious doses, but that treatment must be initiated early in life to be effective. We then created a novel, gene-specific, transcriptional aging clock, which demonstrated that sulforaphane-treated individuals exhibited a “transcriptional age” that was approximately four days younger than age-matched controls, representing a nearly 20% reduction in biological age.

The clearest transcriptional responses were detoxification pathways, which, together with the shape of the dose-response curve, indicates a likely hormetic response to sulforaphane. The hormetic, stress-pathway inducing properties of sulforaphane may indicate that many beneficial dietary supplements work in a fairly generic fashion as mild toxins rather than being driven by the biochemical properties of the compounds themselves (e.g., as antioxidants).

These results support the idea that robust longevity-extending interventions can act via global effects across the organism, as revealed by systems level changes in gene expression.”

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.05.11.653363v1 “The broccoli derivative sulforaphane extends lifespan by slowing the transcriptional aging clock”

There are difficulties in researchers translating nematode studies to mammals and humans. Nematodes lack a homolog to the Keap1 protein, which is sulforaphane’s main mammalian target to activate Nrf2.


A 2024 study developed various mammalian epigenetic clocks:

“A unified transcriptomic model of mortality that encompasses both aging and various models of lifespan-shortening and longevity interventions (i.e., mortality clocks) has been lacking. We conducted an RNA-seq analysis of mice subjected to 20 compound treatments in the Interventions Testing Program (ITP).

We sequenced the transcriptomes of a large cohort of ITP mice subjected to various neutral and longevity interventions, expanded the dataset with publicly available gene expression data representing organs of mice and rats across various strains and lifespan-regulating interventions, connected these models with survival data, and performed a meta-analysis of aggregated 4,539 rodent samples, which allowed us to identify multi-tissue transcriptomic signatures of aging, mortality rate, and maximum lifespan.

Aging and mortality were characterized by upregulation of genes involved in inflammation, complement cascade, apoptosis, and p53 pathway, while oxidative phosphorylation, fatty acid metabolism, and mitochondrial translation were negatively associated with mortality, both before and after adjustment for age.

Utilizing the aggregated dataset, we developed rodent multi-tissue transcriptomic clocks of chronological age, lifespan-adjusted age, and mortality. While the chronological clock could distinguish the effect of detrimental genetic and dietary models, it did not show a decrease in biological age in response to longevity interventions. In contrast, clocks of lifespan-adjusted age and mortality both captured aging-associated dynamics and correctly predicted the effect of lifespan-shortening and extending interventions.

Transcriptomic biomarkers developed in this study provide an opportunity to identify interventions promoting or counteracting molecular mechanisms of mortality, and characterize specific targets associated with their effects at the level of cell types, intracellular functional components, and individual genes. Our study underscores the complexity of aging and mortality mechanisms, the interplay between various processes involved, and the clear potential for developing therapies to extend healthspan and lifespan.”

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.07.04.601982v1.full “Transcriptomic Hallmarks of Mortality Reveal Universal and Specific Mechanisms of Aging, Chronic Disease, and Rejuvenation”


This second study’s references included an ITP study curated in Astaxanthin and aging, which stated:

“Despite the fact that the average diet contained 1840 ppm astaxanthin (only 46% of the target), median lifespans of male UM-HET3 mice were significantly improved. Amounts of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) in the diet averaged 35% of the target dose, which may explain the absence of lifespan effects.”

So screw-ups in making both astaxanthin and DMF mouse chows ended up with study data that didn’t measure the full lifespan impacts of activating transcription factor Nrf2. I’ll assert that such faulty data may have deviated this second study by downplaying Nrf2 activation’s impact on aging, chronic disease, and rejuvenation.

Sponsors may be less likely to be presented sulforaphane and other Nrf2 activator candidates for future aging and chronic disease studies as this first study suggests, thinking that these have already been studied in mammals. Well, maybe these compounds haven’t been accurately studied. There’s no effective way to fix a rodent study’s missing DMF Nrf2 data and faulty astaxanthin Nrf2 data to train an epigenetic clock in this second study.

I could be wrong about this second study using faulty astaxanthin Nrf2 data. It was cited as Reference 27 in the Introduction as an ITP study, but not specifically cited in the Method section. I don’t know how findings such as one of Nrf2’s target genes (“Remarkably, one of the top genes positively associated with maximum lifespan and negatively associated with chronological age and expected mortality was Gpx1, encoding the selenoprotein glutathione peroxidase 1″) and a Nrf2 specific pathway (Phase II) (“Pathways positively associated with lifespan and negatively with mortality, both before and after adjustment for age, included..xenobiotic metabolism..”) were made without Reference 27. Neither of the above studies has been peer reviewed yet.


The third phase of reversing aging and immunosenescent trends

Here’s a 2025 interview with Dr. Greg Fahy:

“We found that we could statistically demonstrate thymic regeneration morphologically on single individuals at single time points. MRI changes really are detecting shifts from the fatty tissue infiltration state of the involuted thymus to the regenerated thymus with functional thymic epithelial cells.

When you go through puberty your thymus involutes so you don’t have much left even when you’re 40. Essentially the process consists of loss of functional thymic mass and replacement of that functional thymic mass with adipose tissue, that’s what thymic involution is. It continues throughout life, but you retain a small amount of functional thymic mass all the way out to the age of 107.

The function of the thymus is to essentially manufacture half of your immune system. You have precursor cells arise from the bone marrow. They either go into the meiotic lineage and turn into the innate immune system, or you have the lymphocytic cells for what turns into T cells that enter the thymus and are educated in the thymus to grow up into newborn T cells and they’re released into the bloodstream.

The thymus has two jobs. It manufactures these lovely T cells without which you die but it also has a secondary finishing school. In the thymus cortex you manufacture all these lovely T cells but in the thymus medulla the T cells go to the medulla and if they don’t pass the second examination that they have to pass before they release into the body they’re all killed off. That second examination is: Do you reject self? As we get older, the thymus weakens in both the functions of making the T cells and screening out the ones that attack self. It stands to reason as we get older and the thymus’ influence wanes, we’re going to get more autoimmune disorders.

It took people a while to catch on to the fact that this involution problem is really a significant issue because the T cells that you made when you were 12, and even 20 and 40, they’re probably lasting until you’re 60. But at some point they don’t get replaced as fast as they’re going out of existence, and then your immune system goes off the cliff. Between the ages of 62 and 78 you lose 98% of your ability to recognize foreign antigens, and you still have a lot of capacity left.

We had nine guys in the first trial. Second trial we had 18 men 6 women and 2 controls that happen to be contemporaneous with that group. We have some more controls now that are either finished or or nearing completion. The second population was older than the first population by about nine years, but based on the epigenetic clocks that we looked at, they were starting off biologically younger.

On this last data analysis for Triim XA we looked at 21 different aging clocks. One aspect of the noise that we’re talking about is that biological aging as measured by some of these clocks is circadian. If you measure your age at 4:00 a.m. versus 11:00 a.m. you’re going to get a different result. It’s dynamic and there’s a trend and over time you change in a certain direction, but over any short period of time you can bounce around a little bit. The clocks predict your probability of cognitive dysfunction, they predict your probability of having impairments in your daily life, and they also predict your mortality.

We’re pretty much wrapping up that second clinical trial and going into the third. As we look at more data we understand more and more things and we see more and more things that we previously were not aware of. We began to look at a phenomena that may be responsible for limiting the magnitude of responses that we’re seeing limiting the aging reversal.

Triim-XD which is the next flavor of Triim-X is going to be looking at shifting biochemical pathways in such a way that it optimizes effects of these three medications that we’re giving people [human growth hormone, DHEA, and metformin] and prevents contradictions between them and prevents side effects of each one of these things. That’s about all I can tell you right now.”


Charts regarding the discussed item of how long effects may last are covered in The next phase of reversing aging and immunosenescent trends which was the last time I curated this research effort.


Practice what you preach, or shut up

A 2025 review subject was sulforaphane and brain health. This paper was the latest in a sequence where the retired lead author self-aggrandized his career by citing previous research.

He apparently doesn’t personally do what these research findings suggest people do. The lead author is a few weeks older than I am, and has completely white hair per an interview (Week 34 comments). I’ve had dark hair growing in (last week a barber said my dark hair was 90%) since Week 8 of eating broccoli sprouts every day, which is a side effect of ameliorating system-wide inflammation and oxidative stress.

If the lead author followed up with what his research investigated, he’d have dark hair, too. Unpigmented white hair and colored hair are both results of epigenetics.

Contrast this lack of personal follow-through of research findings with Dr. Goodenowe’s protocol where he compared extremely detailed personal brain measurements at 17 months and again at 31 months. He believes enough in his research findings to personally act on them, and demonstrate to others how personal agency can enhance a person’s life.

It’s every human’s choice whether or not we take responsibility for our own one precious life. I’ve read and curated on this blog many of this paper’s references. Five years ago for example:

So do more with their information than just read.

https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/17/8/1353 “Sulforaphane and Brain Health: From Pathways of Action to Effects on Specific Disorders”

2025 α-ketoglutarate research

I haven’t mentioned α-ketoglutarate for a while, although I’ve taken it twice a day for several years. Here are four 2025 papers on α-ketoglutarate, starting with a review of its role in bone health:

“α-Ketoglutarate (α-KG) serves as a pivotal intermediate in various metabolic pathways in mammals, significantly contributing to cellular energy metabolism, amino acid metabolism, and other physiological processes. α-KG may be a therapeutic target for a variety of bone-related diseases, such as osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis, because of its role in maintaining metabolic balance of bone.

α-KG, as a rate-determining mitochondrial intermediate, is crucial in cell energy metabolism because it connects intracellular carbon and nitrogen metabolism between isocitrate and succinyl coenzyme A. Additionally, α-KG is closely involved in the amino acid cycle. As a precursor of amino acids such as glutamine and glutamic acid, α-KG plays a direct role in energy production and a wide range of cellular chemical reactions. α-KG provides an energy source, stimulating protein synthesis, inhibiting protein degradation in muscle, and serving as a significant metabolic fuel for gastrointestinal cells.

α-KG promotes osteogenic differentiation of stem cells, increases activity of osteoblasts to promote osteogenesis, and inhibits bone resorption activity of osteoclasts. α-KG in articular cartilage promotes differentiation and maturation of chondrocytes and formation of a cartilage matrix. The protective effect of α-KG on bone has practical value in treatment of abnormal bone loss symptoms in various bone tissue diseases.”

https://www.sciengine.com/ABBS/doi/10.3724/abbs.2025020 “Essential role of the metabolite α-ketoglutarate in bone tissue and bone-related diseases”


A rodent study explored adding α-KG to osteoarthritis treatment:

“Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy represents a promising treatment strategy for osteoarthritis (OA). Nevertheless, the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs may be attenuated under conditions of cellular senescence or when the available clinical quantity is insufficient. α-Ketoglutarate (AKG) exerts beneficial effects on skeletal tissues and activity of stem cells. The present study was designed to explore the potential of AKG in augmenting viability of MSCs and the potential of their combined utilization in treatment of OA.

AKG plays a crucial role in multiple biological processes. It is involved in regulating stem cell differentiation, exerts anti-apoptotic effects, modulates the body’s immune and inflammatory responses, contributes to muscle and bone development, and is essential for maintaining stability of the cartilage matrix.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been demonstrated to have protective effects on chondrocytes and can effectively repair damaged cartilage in OA. However, PRP has intractable problems in terms of product quality control and allogeneic application, and its long-term therapeutic effect gradually weakens.

Combining AKG’s regulation of cellular metabolism with the multi-directional differentiation and immunomodulatory functions of MSCs is likely to generate a synergistic effect. This combined treatment modality targets the complex pathological processes of OA, including cartilage damage, inflammatory responses, and extracellular matrix imbalance, in a more comprehensive manner than a single therapy.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2707368825000032 “The repair effect of α-ketoglutarate combined with mesenchymal stem cells on osteoarthritis via the hedgehog protein pathway”


A rodent study investigated whether α-KG has a role in determining frailty:

“Frailty is an age-related geriatric syndrome, for which the mechanisms remain largely unknown. We performed a longitudinal study of aging female (n = 40) and male (n = 47) C57BL/6NIA mice, measured frailty index, and derived metabolomics data from plasma samples.

We find that frailty related metabolites are enriched for amino acid metabolism and metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, include ergothioneine, tryptophan, and alpha-ketoglutarate, and present sex dimorphism. We identify B vitamin metabolism related flavin adenine dinucleotide and pyridoxate as female-specific frailty biomarkers, and lipid metabolism related sphingomyelins, glycerophosphoethanolamine and glycerophosphocholine as male-specific frailty biomarkers.

We were interested to observe whether metabolite abundance at any specific timepoint was associated with frailty at a future timepoint. Unfortunately, we didn’t observe any metabolites that showed an overall significant association with future FI (FIf) or future devFI (devFIf). When focusing only on the abundance of metabolites at the baseline time point (∼400 days), we found a single metabolite, alpha-ketoglutarate, was negatively associated with both FIf and devFIf.”

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.22.634160v1.full “Metabolomics biomarkers of frailty: a longitudinal study of aging female and male mice”


Wrapping up with a rodent study adding α-KG to exercise for its effects on depression and learning:

“aKG acts as a prophylactic and antidepressant to effectively counteract social avoidance behaviors by modulating BDNF levels in the hippocampus and nucleus accumbens. Exercise increases aKG levels in the circulation.

In mice, aKG supplementation prolongs lifespan and reduces aging-associated frailty. aKG supplementation also reverses aging in humans as measured by DNA methylation patterns.

aKG functions as a co-factor for epigenetic enzymes. Changes in the intracellular αKG/succinate ratio regulates chromatin modifications, including H3K27me3 and ten-eleven translocation (Tet)-dependent DNA demethylation. The ability of aKG to influence epigenetic status of cells may explain both its prophylactic and anti-depressant effects since transcriptional dysregulation and aberrant epigenetic regulation are unifying themes in psychiatric disorders. This may also explain its ability to differentially regulate BDNF expression in the hippocampus and NAc.

If exercise mediates its effects through aKG, aKG may be a pivotal component of an exercise pill along with lactate and BHB that can serve as both a prophylactic and antidepressant treatment for depression.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266717432500031X “α-ketoglutarate (aKG) is a circulatory exercise factor that promotes learning and memory recall and has antidepressant properties


Vitamin K2 and your brain

A 2025 review linked Vitamin K2‘s effects on vascular health with cognitive function:

“Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is negatively correlated with cognitive health. Arterial stiffness, in particular, appears to be a critical factor in the functional and structural brain changes associated with aging. We review the association between vitamin K and cerebral function, discussing novel developments regarding its therapeutic role in arterial stiffness and cognitive health.

Among the non-invasive measures of vascular stiffness, pulse wave velocity (PWV) is considered the gold standard. PWV measures arterial stiffness along the entire aortic pathway, providing a reliable, feasible, and accurate assessment of vascular health. Arterial stiffness, as measured by PWV, is negatively associated with total brain volume, brain atrophy, and cognitive function. Pathogenic mechanisms responsible for vascular stiffness recently shifted from collagen and elastin to the differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells to osteoblastic phenotype, which is triggered by oxidative stress and inflammation, membrane mechanotransduction, lipid metabolism, genetic factors, and epigenetics.

Vitamin K-dependent proteins (VKDPs) rely on vitamin K to undergo γ-glutamylcarboxylation, a modification essential for their biological activity. This family of proteins includes hepatic VKDPs such as prothrombin, FVII, FIX, and FX, protein S and protein C as well as extrahepatic VKDPs such as matrix Gla-protein (MGP), which is involved in inhibiting vascular calcification, and osteocalcin, which plays a role in bone mineralization.

Structural differences between K1 and K2 influence their bioavailability, absorption, bioactivity, and distribution within tissues. Compared to vitamin K1, the K2 subtype menaquinone-7 (MK-7) has a significantly longer half-life, accumulates more effectively in blood, and exhibits greater biological activity, particularly in facilitating the carboxylation of extrahepatic VKDPs. Circulating dephosphorylated, uncarboxylated Matrix Gla protein (dp-ucMGP), a marker of extrahepatic vitamin K deficiency, could represent a novel therapeutic target for mitigating both arterial stiffness and cognitive decline.

Vascular calcification and arterial stiffness may represent pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the onset and progression of cognitive decline. Vitamin K deficiency is a key determinant of arterial health and, by extension, may influence cognitive function in the elderly.

To elucidate potential therapeutic benefits of MK-7 supplementation on cognitive function, future randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed. These trials should focus on using optimal dosages (>500 μg/day), ensuring long follow-up periods, and utilizing the most bioactive form of vitamin K (MK-7).”

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/aging-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2024.1527535/full “The role of vitamin K2 in cognitive impairment: linking vascular health to brain health”


A coauthor Dr. Katarzyna Maresz took time on her weekend to answer a few questions:

1. Regarding the second paper of Part 2 of Vitamin K2 – What can it do?:

Hello Dr. Maresz. Did this trial ever happen? “Effects of Combined Vitamin K2 and Vitamin D3 Supplementation on Na[18F]F PET/MRI in Patients with Carotid Artery Disease: The INTRICATE Rationale and Trial Design” I haven’t seen a followup mention of it since 2021.

“Hello. The study never started. The capsules were produced for the study, but the research center experienced delays. Unfortunately, I’m afraid it won’t proceed. Regarding studies on aortic stenosis and vitamin K2, BASIC II has been completed, and the data from this pilot study are currently under analysis. (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29561783/). There is also published study with K1: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.027011

2. Thank you! In your recent review of cognitive function and K2 (above), what influenced the heuristic that a >500 mcg K2 dose should be pursued in future RCTs?

“The optimal vitamin K dosage depends on the target population. Research in kidney patients has shown that 460 mcg daily was insufficient, that is why have hypothesis that at least 500 mcg should be used. The ongoing VIKIPEDIA study is using 1,000 mcg daily in peritoneal dialysis patients. In healthy young individuals, 180-360 mcg was effective in improving vitamin K status (British Journal of Nutrition (2012), 108, 1652–1657) . However, a one-year clinical study found that 180 mcg daily was sufficient for women but not for men. Additionally, older adults and individuals with metabolic disorders may require higher doses for optimal benefits. So it is pretty complicated situation. We do not have good marker of extrahepatic K status. dp-ucMGP seems to be valuable from CV perspective.”

3. Regarding Fat-soluble vitamin competition:

Thank you again Dr. Maresz! Would any consideration be given to dosing K2 separately from dosing another fat-soluble vitamin? A 2015 in vitro study found that vitamins D, A, and E outcompeted K1 intake when simultaneously dosed. I inferred from the one capsule of D3-K2 produced for the canceled trial that isn’t that much of a problem with K2?

“You are right, the key findings suggest that vitamin D, E, and K share common absorption pathways, leading to competitive interactions during uptake. However, I’m afraid we do not have human data. The majority of studies have focused on vitamin K2 alone. Recent research combining K2 and D3 showed an improvement in vitamin K status. Example: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35465686/ or increase in D level: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39861434/. We do not know if VKDP activation or absorption of D would be more effective if K2 were not supplemented with D3 at the same time. Unfortunately, I doubt anyone will fund such a study, as clinical trials are very expensive. In vitro data will always raise questions regarding their relevance to human physiology. In my opinion, for patients to fully benefit from optimal vitamin K status, vitamin D levels should also be optimized, as both have synergistic effects.”