A blood plasma aging clock, Part 2

Quite a few people recently looked at Part 1 which curated “Undulating changes in human plasma proteome across lifespan are linked to disease” in December 2019. Let’s start with a 2023 human study coauthored by Part 1’s lead researcher:

“The aim of this study is to identify a set of proteins in human plasma associated with aging by integration of data of four independent, large-scaled datasets. We identified a set of 273 plasma proteins significantly associated with aging (aging proteins, APs) across these cohorts consisting of healthy individuals and individuals with comorbidities and highlight their biological functions.

arthur and robbins cohorts

Although these presented proteins may be different compared to other presented proteomic clocks [like Part 1’s], this can be explained due to a variety of factors. Across studies there may be several technical factors, such as used anti-coagulants, and biological differences, such as different age ranges, ethnicity and corrections for BMI, which may influence the plasma proteome in the cohorts. To overcome these differences, we focused on the overlap between the different studies as they also present several of these confounding factors.

We show that individuals presenting accelerated or decelerated aging based on their plasma proteome, respectively have a more aged or younger systemic environment. These results provide novel insights in understanding the aging process and its underlying mechanisms and highlight potential modulators contributing to healthy aging.”

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fragi.2023.1112109/full “Markers of aging: Unsupervised integrated analyses of the human plasma proteome”


A 2023 human study cited the above study and found:

“Our cross-sectional study of adults adherent and non-adherent to recommended lifestyle habits established strong group differences for 39 proteins primarily related to innate immunity and lipoprotein metabolism. Many of these protein differences were best explained by group contrasts in adiposity and visceral fat. The relatively small number of upregulated and downregulated proteins associated with good lifestyle habits should facilitate development of a targeted lifestyle proteomic panel that can be used in future studies to determine efficacy of various prevention and treatment strategies.”

https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3097901/v1 “Adherence to Lifestyle Recommendations Linked to Innate Immunity and Lipoprotein Metabolism: A Cross-Sectional Comparison Using Untargeted Proteomics”


A 2023 human study from Google-owned Calico:

“In most cases, direction of effects between cause-specific and all-cause mortality was concordant, but all-cause mortality association was not statistically significant. Neither do we have insight into conditional causal effects of these proteins nor interaction effects between them.”

https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-2626017/v1 “Plasma Proteomic Determinants of Common Causes of Mortality”

“Undulating” in Part 1 described plasma proteins changing over time with peaks at ages 34, 60, and 78. Those peaks don’t provide a base for linearly extrapolating all-cause mortality.

peaks


A 2023 rodent study did a touch better with one of Part 1’s 46 proteins of a conserved aging signature that changed in the same direction with mice and humans, although it didn’t fully investigate protein expression over time.

“Interactions between CHRDL1 levels, age, and plasma lipids that might affect cardiometabolic health should be further investigated.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/12/4/624 “Chordin-like 1, a Novel Adipokine, Markedly Promotes Adipogenesis and Lipid Accumulation”

Sulforaphane, TFEB, and ADH1

Looked for a recent follow-on study of the 2021 Precondition your defenses with broccoli sprouts, specifically:

“NFE2L2/NRF2 is a target gene of TFEB (transcription factor EB), a master regulator of autophagic and lysosomal functions, which we show here to be potently activated by sulforaphane.”

Some interesting papers cited it, but no studies continued its sulforaphane/TFEB line of inquiry. A 2022 review made a good point when citing this study for TFEB, but didn’t tie it in with sulforaphane:

“TFEB is translocated into the nucleus with a moderate increase of ROS through a Ca2+-dependent, but mTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase)-independent mechanism. Essential genes involved in lysosome biogenesis and autophagosome are activated, which are crucial for removal of damaged mitochondria.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730074/ “Phytochemicals and modulation of exercise-induced oxidative stress: a novel overview of antioxidants”


A search of TFEB brought up a 2023 nematode study:

“We searched for effectors acting downstream of the transcription factor EB (TFEB), known as HLH-30 in C. elegans, because TFEB/HLH-30 is necessary across anti-aging interventions. Its overexpression is sufficient to extend C. elegans lifespan, and reduce biomarkers of aging in mammals including humans.

While investigating the potential role of autophagy in hlh-30 dependent longevity of the mxl-3 C. elegans mutant, we found that the current model has exceptions. Contrary to expectation, we found that autophagy is not activated in the mxl-3 mutant, and that neither autophagy nor lysosomal activity are required for the longevity phenotype observed in these mutant animals. mxl-3 longevity is hlh-30-dependent but autophagy-independent.

Instead, we found the gene encoding Alcohol DeHydrogenase ADH-1 induced in mxl-3 and other hlh-30-dependent anti-aging interventions. adh-1 is induced in an hlh-30-dependent manner in longevity models caloric restriction (eat-2), insulin insensitivity (daf-2), and mTOR inhibition (let-363 RNAi).

insulin insensitivity longevity model

We present an alcohol-dehydrogenase-mediated anti-aging response (AMAR) that is essential for C. elegans longevity driven by HLH-30 overexpression, caloric restriction, mTOR inhibition, and insulin-signaling deficiency. Overexpression of ADH-1 is sufficient to activate AMAR, which extends healthspan and lifespan by reducing levels of glycerol, an age-associated and aging-promoting alcohol.”

https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(23)00128-8 “Increased alcohol dehydrogenase 1 activity promotes longevity” (not freely available) Thanks to Dr. Eyleen O’Rourke for providing a copy.


A 2022 human study found that chronic ADH1 activation occurs in liver disease:

“Activity of total ADH, ADH isoenzymes and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) was evaluated in the blood serum of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), a chronic autoimmune disease of the liver. An increase in class I ADH and total ADH activity indicates that the isoenzyme class I ADH is released by compromised liver cells and can be useful diagnostic markers of PBC.”

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00005-022-00667-4 “An Assessment of the Serum Activity of ADH and ALDH in Patients with Primary Biliary Cholangitis”

Chronically activating any of the body’s systems points to a problem. There’s has to be a balance.


A 2022 rodent study investigated ADH1 activation and MEK1/2 inhibitors for beneficial effects:

“Alcohol is mainly catabolized by class I alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH1) in liver. ADH deficiency can aggravate ethanol-induced tissue injury.

Extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2) is involved in alcohol metabolism. However, the relationship between ERK1/2 and ADH1 remains unclear.

Mitogen-activated protein kinases 1/2 (MEK1/2) is required to phosphorylate and activate ERK1/2. Protein expression of phosphorylated ERK1/2 in liver is inversely associated with ethanol-induced liver injury and hepatocytes apoptosis, suggesting inhibition of ERK1/2 may protect hepatocytes from ethanol-induced cytotoxicity. We hypothesize that inhibition of ERK1/2 by MEK1/2 inhibitors may protect hepatocytes from ethanol cytotoxicity by activating ADH1 expression.

Results showed MEK1/2 inhibitors significantly increased ADH1 protein expression by inducing its transcription activity. Our findings revealed inhibition of ERK1/2 can significantly increase ADH1 expression, indicating MEK1/2 inhibitors may possess potential application in alcohol-related diseases.”

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11033-022-07361-w “MEK1/2 inhibitors induce class I alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH1) expression by regulating farnesoid X receptor in hepatic cell lines and C57BL/6J mouse” (not freely available)

Chronically inhibiting any of the body’s systems also points to a problem.


A 2022 rodent study investigated TFEB activation and MEK1/2 inhibitors for beneficial effects:

“Inhibiting MEK/ERK signaling using a clinically available MEK1/2 inhibitor induces protection of neurons through autophagic lysosomal activation mediated by transcription factor EB (TFEB) in a model of AD.”

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-022-01713-5 “MEK1/2 inhibition rescues neurodegeneration by TFEB-mediated activation of autophagic lysosomal function in a model of Alzheimer’s Disease”


PXL_20230720_102047833

Adverse Childhood Experiences, Part 2

A request was made to present studies that investigated epigenetic impacts of corporal punishments or physical trauma to children or adolescents. Here’s a follow-on of the 2015 Grokking an Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) score, since physical abuse is one factor of an ACE score.

1. The largest problem is that a person filling out an ACE questionnaire or Childhood Trauma Questionnaire can’t provide first-hand answers of their own experiences during womb life, infancy, and early childhood. These critical development periods are more impacted by adversity than are later life windows.

Human brains aren’t developed enough before age 3 to provide retrospective answers using cerebral memories. A self-reported ACE score can’t possibly address what happened during the times when we were most vulnerable to disrupted neurodevelopment. And good luck with parents providing factual histories of whether they physically or emotionally neglected, physically or emotionally abused, or otherwise adversely treated their fetus, infant, and young child.

2. Another problem is researchers can pretty much choose whatever questions they want as input criteria. I’ve seen pliable ACE scores developed from 5- to 25-item questionnaires.

Do these questionnaires cover all relevant adverse childhood experiences? For example, are researchers permitted to use as inputs societal-created adversities a child may have lived through such as the Khmer Rouge or Cultural Revolution? Studies are just starting to investigate adverse childhood experiences created by worldwide abuses of authority since 2020.

3. Other problems were discussed in a 2023 paper https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0145213423003162 “Adverse childhood experiences and adult outcomes using a causal framework perspective: Challenges and opportunities” (not freely available), two of which were:

  • Adding up ACE factors to a cumulative score ignores the impact of synergistic sets. For example, although both cumulative ACE scores are 2, a child who was physically and sexually abused would probably be more adversely affected than a child whose parents divorced or separated, and also had a family member incarcerated.
  • At any given time point, and especially with older people, there’s a potential selection bias against those most affected by adverse childhood experiences, such as those who died.

Using flawed, squishy, cumulative ACE scores as inputs, here are two 2023 studies that found epigenetic associations:

“We tested the following pre-registered hypotheses: Mothers’ adverse childhood experiences are correlated with DNA methylation (DNAm) in peripheral blood during pregnancy (hypothesis 1) and in cord blood samples from newborn infants (hypothesis 2), and women’s depression and anxiety symptoms during pregnancy mediate the association between mothers’ ACE exposure and prenatal/neonatal DNA methylation (hypothesis 3).

  1. Hypothesis 1: In 896 mother−infant pairs with available methylation and ACE exposure data, there were no significant associations between mothers’ ACE score and DNAm from antenatal peripheral blood, after controlling for covariates.
  2. Hypothesis 2: In infant cord blood, there were 5 CpG sites significantly differentially methylated in relation to mothers’ ACEs (false discovery rate < .05), but only in male offspring. Effect sizes were medium. CpG sites were in genes related to mitochondrial function and neuronal development in the cerebellum.
  3. Hypothesis 3: There was no mediation by maternal anxiety/depression symptoms found between mothers’ ACEs score and DNAm in the significant CpG sites in male cord blood.”

https://www.jaacap.org/article/S0890-8567(23)00313-1/fulltext “Epigenetic Intergenerational Transmission: Mothers’ Adverse Childhood Experiences and DNA Methylation”


“In this study, the effect of cumulative ACEs experienced on human maternal DNAm was estimated while accounting for interaction with domains of ACEs in prenatal peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples. Intergenerational transmission of ACE-associated DNAm was explored used paired maternal and neonatal cord blood samples. Replication in buccal samples was also explored.

We used a four-level categorical indicator variable for ACEs exposure: none (0 ACEs), low (1–3 ACEs), moderate (4–6 ACEs), and high (> 6 ACEs). 🙄

125a4c3cacfe4b922e5b864c

https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-2977515/v1 “Effect of Parental Adverse Childhood Experiences on Intergenerational DNA Methylation Signatures”

Brain endothelial cells

Six 2023 papers on the subject, starting with a rodent study:

“One of the primary discoveries of our study is that the endothelial cell (EC) transcriptome is dynamically regulated by both aging and heterochronic parabiosis. We found that ECs, when compared with other brain cell types, exhibited one of the highest fractions of aging-related genes that were rescued after heterochronic parabiosis in the old brain, and similarly, the highest fraction of aging-related genes that were disrupted after heterochronic parabiosis in the young brain. This finding supports our previous research that vasculature is strongly affected by aging and disease, and is capable of regrowth after heterochronic parabiosis or systemic GDF11 treatment.

parabiosis

We observed that a subset of ECs was classified as mitogenic. It is reasonable to speculate that the growth of these cells, which is probably prevented or suspended by the inflammatory environment of the aged brain, may be among the cell populations that respond to these interventions.

Although proteostasis in brain ECs has not been thoroughly investigated, they are apparently long-lived cells and, like neurons, might therefore accumulate protein aggregates with age, potentially compromising their function. ECs become senescent with age, but parabiosis may reverse that phenotype as well.

These findings underline the strong susceptibility and malleability of ECs, which are directly exposed to secreted factors in both brain parenchyma and blood, to adapt to changes in their microenvironment. ECs, despite comprising <5% of the total number of brain cells, are a promising and accessible target for treatment of aging and its associated diseases.”

https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-023-00373-6 “Heterochronic parabiosis reprograms the mouse brain transcriptome by shifting aging signatures in multiple cell types”


A review elaborated on endothelial cell senescence:

“ECs form highly dynamic and differentiated monolayers arranged in a vascular network. Within brain tissue, the ECs of arteries, capillaries, and veins present different molecular characteristics. The main functions of ECs as a major cellular component of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) are to express cell membrane transport proteins, produce inflammatory mediators, deliver nutrients to brain tissue, and prevent drugs and toxins from entering the central nervous system.

ECs are the first echelons of cells affected at the onset of senescence due to their special structural position in the vascular network. Senescent ECs produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), which directly inhibit smooth muscle potassium channels and cause vasoconstriction.

The vascular endothelium is in a constant process of damage and repair, and once damage occurs, ECs replenish themselves to remove damaged cells. EC senescence makes the endothelium less capable of self-repair. With the decline in endothelial function, excess accumulated senescent cells express senescence-associated secretory phenotypes (SASPs), which result in senescence of adjacent cells, and eventually degeneration of vascular function.”

https://www.aginganddisease.org/EN/10.14336/AD.2023.0226-1 “Endothelial Senescence in Neurological Diseases”


A human study investigated above-mentioned differences in brain endothelial cells:

“We performed single nucleus RNAseq on tissue from 32 Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and non-AD donors each with five cortical regions: entorhinal cortex, inferior temporal gyrus, prefrontal cortex, visual association cortex, and primary visual cortex. Analysis of 51,586 endothelial cells revealed unique gene expression patterns across the five regions in non-AD donors.

Visual cortex areas, which are affected late in AD progression and experience less neurodegeneration, expressed more genes related to vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. Highly vulnerable areas such as the entorhinal cortex expressed more oxidative stress-related genes in normal aged brain, suggesting endothelial dysfunction in this region even in the absence of severe AD pathology.

The present work shows that senescence-related gene signatures are increased across several brain regions, and confirms these changes in endothelial cells in the absence of other vascular cell types. While endothelial cells are not typically associated with protein aggregation, upregulated protein folding pathways suggest that proteostatic stress is a key pathway in this cell type.”

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.02.16.528825v1.full “Endothelial Cells are Heterogeneous in Different Brain Regions and are Dramatically Altered in Alzheimer’s Disease”


A human cell study abstract on above-mentioned blood-brain barrier endothelial cells:

“The BBB is a semi-permeable and protective barrier of the brain, primarily composed of endothelial cells interconnected by tight junction proteins, that regulates movement of ions and molecules between blood and neural matter. In pathological conditions such as traumatic brain injury (TBI), disruption of the BBB contributes to leakage of solutes and fluids into brain parenchyma, resulting in onset of cerebral edema and elevation of intracranial pressure.

The objective of this study was to determine upstream regulators of NLRP3 signaling and BBB hyperpermeability, particularly to determine if extracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) via P2X7R, a purinergic receptor, promotes NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Extracellular ATP is a major contributor of secondary injuries following TBI.

Our results suggest that extracellular ATP promotes NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Subsequent caspase-1 and MMP-9-mediated tight junction disorganization are major pathways that lead to BBB dysfunction and hyperpermeability following conditions such as TBI.”

https://journals.physiology.org/doi/abs/10.1152/physiol.2023.38.S1.5732827 “Regulation of Blood-Brain Barrier Endothelial Cell Hyperpermeability by NLRP3 Inflammasome Inhibition”


A human study further investigated effects of traumatic brain injury on brain endothelial cells:

“We previously demonstrated that extracellular vesicles (EVs) released from injured brains led to endothelial barrier disruption and vascular leakage. Here, we enriched plasma EVs from TBI patients (TEVs), detected high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) exposure to 50.33 ± 10.17% of TEVs, and found the number of HMGB1+TEVs correlated with injury severity. We then investigated for the first time the impact of TEVs on endothelial function using adoptive transfer models.

HMGB1 is secreted by activated cells or passively released by necrotic or injured cells. After post-translational modifications, it interacts with receptors such as toll-like receptors (TLRs; e.g., TLRs 2, 4, and 9) and the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) to trigger multiple signaling pathways and mediate inflammatory and immune responses. Extracellular HMGB1 promotes endothelial dysfunction, leukocyte activation and recruitment, as well as thrombosis.

These results suggest that circulating EVs isolated from patients with TBI alone are sufficient to induce endothelial dysfunction. They contribute to secondary brain injury that are dependent on immunologically active HMGB1 exposed on their surface. This finding provided new insight for development of potential therapeutic targets and diagnostic biomarkers for TBI.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043661823001470 “Circulating extracellular vesicles from patients with traumatic brain injury induce cerebrovascular endothelial dysfunction”


To wrap up, eat mushrooms to protect your brain endothelial cells!

“Natural compound ergothioneine (ET), which is synthesised by certain fungi and bacteria, has considerable cytoprotective potential. We previously demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects of ET on 7-ketocholesterol (7KC)-induced endothelial injury in human blood-brain barrier endothelial cells (hCMEC/D3). 7KC is an oxidised form of cholesterol present in atheromatous plaques and sera of patients with hypercholesterolaemia and diabetes mellitus. The aim of this study was to elucidate the protective effect of ET on 7KC-induced mitochondrial damage.

Protective effects of ET were diminished when endothelial cells were coincubated with verapamil hydrochloride (VHCL), a nonspecific inhibitor of the ET transporter OCTN1 (SLC22A4). This outcome demonstrates that ET-mediated protection against 7KC-induced mitochondrial damage occurred intracellularly and not through direct interaction with 7KC.

OCTN1 mRNA expression itself was significantly increased in endothelial cells after 7KC treatment, consistent with the notion that stress and injury may increase ET uptake. Our results indicate that ET can protect against 7KC-induced mitochondrial injury in brain endothelial cells.”

https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/6/5498 “Protective Effect of Ergothioneine against 7-Ketocholesterol-Induced Mitochondrial Damage in hCMEC/D3 Human Brain Endothelial Cells”

A biomarker for impaired cognitive function?

This 2023 rodent study investigated associations between a drug, a gut microbiota species, cognitive function, and proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-6:

“We show that gut microbiota is altered by metformin, which is necessary for protection against ageing-associated cognitive function declines in aged mice.

  • Mice treated with antibiotics did not exhibit metformin-mediated cognitive function protection.
  • Treatment with Akkermansia muciniphila improved cognitive function in aged mice.
  • A. muciniphila decreased proinflammatory-associated pathways, particularly that of proinflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-6, in both peripheral blood and hippocampal profiles, which was correlated with cognitive function improvement.
  • An IL-6 antibody protected cognitive function, and an IL-6 recombinant protein abolished the protective effect of A. muciniphila on cognitive function in aged mice.

40168_2023_1567_Figa_HTML

A. muciniphila, which is mediated in gut microbiota by metformin, modulates inflammation-related pathways in the host and improves cognitive function in aged mice by reducing proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 both systemically and in the hippocampus. This is direct evidence to validate that gut microbiota mediate the effect of metformin on cognitive improvement.”

https://microbiomejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40168-023-01567-1Akkermansia muciniphila, which is enriched in the gut microbiota by metformin, improves cognitive function in aged mice by reducing the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-6″


IL-6 may be useful with other biomarkers of impaired cognitive function. It’s too coarse to track improved cognitive function past a certain point, though. Maybe the current IL-6 blood test can be refined as high-specificity CRP and regular CRP blood tests were done?

We don’t need to take this drug or be concerned about this gut bacteria species in order to lower inflammation. Click the IL-6 link above and see blog posts such as Part 2 of Rejuvenation therapy and sulforaphane for other methods.

PXL_20230630_092833465

Nrf2 Week #6: Phytochemicals

This 2023 review explored Nrf2 relationships with plant chemicals:

“This review focuses on possible mechanisms of Nrf2 activation by natural phytochemicals in preventing or treating chronic diseases, and regulating oxidative stress. Excess oxidative stress is closely related to many kinds of chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, diabetes, obesity, and other inflammatory diseases.

Mitochondrial dysfunction and hyperglycemia lead to the massive production of ROS, which triggers molecular damage, inflammation, ferroptosis, insulin resistance, and β-cell dysfunction.

antioxidants-12-00236-g001

Crosstalk between Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway and other signaling pathways endows it with high complexity and significance in the multi-function of phytochemicals. Limited human data makes an urgent need to open the new field of phytochemical-original supplement application in human chronic disease prevention.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/12/2/236 “The Regulatory Effect of Phytochemicals on Chronic Diseases by Targeting Nrf2-ARE Signaling Pathway”


Top ten mentions, not including references:

  • 21 Sulforaphane
  • 16 Broccoli
  • 9 Curcumin
  • 5 Resveratrol
  • 5 Green tea catechins
  • 4 Luteolin
  • 3 Garlic
  • 3 Soy isoflavones
  • 3 Lycopene
  • 3 Quercetin

PXL_20230518_191008431

Nrf2 Week #4: Aging

Two 2023 reviews of Nrf2 and aging, starting with Nrf2-mitochondria interactions:

“We discuss molecular mechanisms of interactions between Nrf2 and mitochondria that influence the rate of aging and lifespan. Nrf2 activity positively affects both mitochondrial dynamics and mitochondrial quality control.

Nrf2 influences mitochondrial function through regulation of nuclear genome-encoded mitochondrial proteins and changes in the balance of ROS or other metabolites. In turn, multiple regulatory proteins functionally associated with mitochondria affect Nrf2 activity and even form mutual regulatory loops with Nrf2. These loops enable fine-tuning of cellular redox balance and, possibly, of the cellular metabolism as a whole.

mtDNA-encoded signal peptides interact with nuclear regulatory systems, first of all, Nrf2, and are possibly involved in regulation of the aging rate. Interactions between regulatory cascades that link programs ensuring maintenance of cellular homeostasis and cellular responses to oxidative stress are a significant part of both aging and anti-aging programs.

Understanding these interactions will be of great help in searching for molecular targets to counteract aging-associated diseases and aging itself. Future research on Nrf2 signaling and ability of various substances that activate the Nrf2 pathway to prevent age-associated chronic diseases will provide further insight into the role of Nrf2 activation as a possible longevity-promoting intervention.”

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0006297922120057 “Transcription Factor Nrf2 and Mitochondria – Friends or Foes in the Regulation of Aging Rate” (not freely available) Thanks to Dr. Gregory A. Shilovsky for providing a copy.


The second review evaluated whether Nrf2 is a master regulator of aging:

“This paper briefly presents main mechanisms of mammalian aging and roles of inflammation and oxidative stress in this process. Mechanisms of Nrf2 activity regulation, its involvement in aging and development of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype are also discussed.

The age-related decrease in Nrf2 activity is of universal interspecies character:

  • Rodents with high Nrf2 activity have a longer lifespan than rodents with low activity.
  • Genetic knockout of Nrf2 usually leads to the increased senescent phenotype in a variety of animal organs and tissues, and also reduces lifespan of female mice.
  • There are also opposite examples, where Nrf2 knockout in aging mice reduced iron ions deposition in the brain, lowered the level of oxidative damage in the striatum, and also alleviated age-related motor dysfunction.

10541_2022_2401_Fig2

It would be incorrect to consider the effect of Nrf2 transcription factor at the organism level as exclusively antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and, ultimately, anti-aging. Nrf2 controls many genes, products of which have complex, pleiotropic effects on the body:

  • No experiments that use Nrf2 chemical inducers as anti-aging drugs have been performed so far.
  • Nrf2 is not involved in life extension caused by caloric restriction.
  • Epigenetic clocks do not reveal transcription factors activity of which changes with aging.

Aging is accompanied by changes in gene expression profiles, which are tissue- and species-specific. These changes only to a small extent include genes controlled by Nrf2. At the moment, it cannot be concluded that Nrf2 is the master regulator of the aging process.”

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0006297922120045 “Does Nrf2 Play a Role of a Master Regulator of Mammalian Aging?”


PXL_20230520_182643299

Nrf2 Week #3: Epigenetics

To follow the Nrf2 Week #2 finding that chromatin accessibility parallels Nrf2 expression, this 2023 cell study explored how Nrf2 influences other epigenetic processes:

“We identified antioxidant response element sequences in promoter regions of genes encoding several epigenetic regulatory factors, such as histone deacetylases (HDACs), DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), and proteins involved in microRNA biogenesis.

  • We treated cells with dimethyl fumarate (DMF), an activator of the NRF2 pathway through both the KEAP1 and GSK-3 pathways. NRF2 is able to modulate expression of HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, and SIRT1 in different cell types.
  • DMF treatment induced DNMT1 and DNMT3b at both mRNA and protein levels. For DNMT3a, there was a slight induction of mRNA levels but not at the protein level.

antioxidants-12-00641-g007

  • Our data indicate that of all miRNAs analyzed, only miR-27a-3p, miR-27b-3p, miR-128-3p, and miR-155-5p associate with Nfe2l2 mRNA. NRF2 causes degradation of miR-155-5p, which is implicated in neuroinflammation and other pathologies, and is the main miRNA induced by LPS treatment in microglia. miR-155 alters expression of genes that regulate axon growth, supporting the bioinformatic prediction that miR-155 can regulate expression of genes involved in central nervous system development and neurogenesis.

Todate we only understand how epigenetic modifications affect expression and function of the NRF2 pathway. The fact that NRF2 can promote expression of type I HDACs, DNMTs, and proteins involved in miRNA biogenesis opens new perspectives on the spectrum of actions of NRF2 and its epigenetic influences.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/12/3/641 “The Transcription Factor NRF2 Has Epigenetic Regulatory Functions Modulating HDACs, DNMTs, and miRNA Biogenesis”


PXL_20230515_185958612

Nrf2 Week #2: Neurons

To follow the Nrf2 Week #1 suggestion that Nrf2 target neurological disorders, this 2023 cell study investigated Nrf2 expression in neurons:

“Oxidative metabolism is inextricably linked to production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which have the potential to damage all classes of macromolecules. Yet ROS are not invariably detrimental. Several properties make ROS useful signaling molecules, including their potential for rapid modification of proteins and close ties to cellular metabolism.

We used multiple single cell genomic datasets to explore Nrf2 expression and regulation in hundreds of neuronal and non-neuronal cell types in mouse and human. With few exceptions, Nrf2 is expressed at far lower levels in neurons than in non-neuronal support cells in both species.

This pattern is maintained in multiple disease states, and the chromatin accessibility landscape at the Nrf2 locus parallels these expression differences. These results imply that Nrf2 activity is limited in almost all neurons of the mouse and human central nervous system (CNS).

nrf2 expression

We separated cell types into neuron or non-neuronal ‘support’ cell categories. The general ‘support’ term is not meant to minimize the functional relevance of non-neuronal cells in the CNS, but is an umbrella term meant to cover everything from glial cell types (astrocytes, microglia, oligodendrocytes) to endothelial cells.

It is not clear why an important, near ubiquitous cytoprotective transcription factor like Nrf2 remains off in mature neurons, especially considering oxidative stress is a driver of many diseases. The simplest explanation is that Nrf2 activity also disrupts normal function of mature neurons.

ROS play a key role in controlling synaptic plasticity in mature neurons. These activity-dependent changes in synaptic transmission, which are important for learning and memory, are disrupted by antioxidants.

A subset of important Nrf2-targeted antioxidant genes (e.g., Slc3a2, Slc7a11, Nqo1, Prdx1) are also low in neurons. So it is likely that these and/or other Nrf2 targets must remain low or non-ROS-responsive in mature neurons. Future work exploring why this expression pattern persists in mature neurons will inform our models on roles of antioxidant genes in normal neuronal physiology and in neurological disorders.

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.05.09.540014v1.full “Limited Expression of Nrf2 in Neurons Across the Central Nervous System”


PXL_20230520_182827767

Don’t eat yourself into disease, Part 2

This blog’s 1000th curation is a 2023 rodent study associating gut microbiota, behavior, memory, and food reward:

“Energy intake and energy expenditure is regulated by the hypothalamus, and is referred to as homeostatic regulation of food intake. The reward system is the non-homeostatic regulation of food intake – pleasure-related consumption of foods enriched in fat and sugar. The pleasure is encoded by dopamine release from dopaminergic neurons projecting from the ventral tegmental area to the striatum, the nucleus accumbens, and the prefrontal cortex.

Food reward can be divided into three components – liking, wanting, and learning:

  • Liking refers to food hedonic value;
  • Wanting to the motivational process to seek out and consume certain foods; and
  • Learning to reinforcing conditioning behavior associated with food intake stimulus.

We confirmed that obese mice have a dysregulation of the learning and the wanting components of  food reward. Our previous data showed that the liking component was transferable through fecal material transplantation.

We demonstrated that gut microbes play a role in the regulation of food reward, and could be responsible for compulsive behavior and excessive motivation to obtain sucrose pellets. Moreover, obese gut microbes affected dopaminergic and opioid markers involved in reward system.

We identified 33HPP (produced exclusively by gut bacteria) as particularly increased in mice recipients of gut microbes from obese mice. We were able to demonstrate its effects as key mediator of the gut-brain axis controlling the reward response to palatable food.”

https://microbiomejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40168-023-01526-w “Obese-associated gut microbes and derived phenolic metabolite as mediators of excessive motivation for food reward”


PXL_20230415_195202937

Eat broccoli sprouts for depression, Part 3

Here are two papers published after Part 2 that cited the Part 1 rodent study, starting with a 2023 rodent study performed by several Part 1 coauthors:

“We used a low-dose LPS-induced endotoxaemia model to mimic clinical characteristics of sepsis. We found that adolescent LPS treatment was sufficient to increase levels of inflammatory factor TNF-α in both the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and hippocampus at post-natal day P22.

P21 LPS-treated mice were injected with sulforaphane (SFN) or saline intraperitoneally at P49 and then subjected to subthreshold social defeat stress (SSDS). We found that SFN preventative treatment significantly:

  • Decreased the social avoidance, anhedonia, and behavioural despair detected by the social interaction test, sucrose preference test, tail suspension test, and forced swim test, respectively.
  • Decreased anxiety-like behaviours without affecting locomotor activities.
  • Increased Nrf2 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in the mPFC of P21 LPS-treated mice after SSDS compared with saline control mice.

The above results suggest that activation of the Nrf2-BDNF signalling pathway prevents the effect of adolescent LPS-induced endotoxaemia on stress vulnerability during adulthood.

sulforaphane and stress vulnerability

These results suggest that early adolescence is a critical period during which inflammation can promote stress vulnerability during adulthood. This might be due to increased inflammatory response in the mPFC, and mediated by decreased levels of Nrf2 and BDNF. These findings may shed light on the potential use of SFN as an alternative preventative intervention for inflammation-induced stress vulnerability.”

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00213-022-06285-4 “Lipopolysaccharide-induced endotoxaemia during adolescence promotes stress vulnerability in adult mice via deregulation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 in the medial prefrontal cortex” (not freely available)

This study demonstrated that adolescent diseases and stresses don’t necessarily develop into adult social problems. A timely intervention may even prevent future adult problems.

The one-time 10 mg/kg sulforaphane dose was the same as Part 1’s dose, a human equivalent of which is (10 mg x .081) x 70 kg = 57 mg.

I’d like to know more about how subjects’ memories of adverse events were retained, and subsequently affected their biology and behavior. Pretty sure limbic structures like the hypothalamus as well as lower brain structures played a part.


A 2022 review summarized what was known up to that time regarding Nrf2 and depression:

“Sulforaphane, an organosulfur compound isolated from Brassicaceae plants, is a potent natural NRF2 activator. Sulforaphane:

  • Exerts antidepressant- and anxiolytic-like activities and inhibits HPA axis and inflammatory response.
  • Has both therapeutic and prophylactic effects on inflammation-related depression.
  • Confers stress resilience.
  • Protects neurons via autophagy and promotes mitochondrial biogenesis by activating Nrf2.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213231722002944 “Nrf2: An all-rounder in depression”


PXL_20230306_202857493

Eat broccoli sprouts to protect your brain from stroke

Starting this blog’s ninth year with a 2022 rodent study of sulforaphane neuroprotection:

“An example of endogenous neuroprotection is ischemia-resistance of the hippocampal regions comprising the CA2, CA3, CA4 and dentate gyrus subfields (here abbreviated to CA2-4,DG) which can be contrasted with the ischemia-vulnerable CA1 region, which is noted in rodents as well as humans.

As with CA2-4,DG, nuclear Nrf2 levels are also higher in the olfactory bulb, while in the cortex, striatum, and cerebellum, they are similar to ones observed in the CA1 region.

brain area comparative Nrf2 activity

We found an in vitro dose-dependent response to administration of sulforaphane on neuronal viability, with an optimal effect noted where the dose was 10 µM. A protective effect was also evident in vivo when a single 5 mg/kg dose of sulforaphane was administered intraperitoneally with delay to ischemia.

Morphology of the CA1 region stratum pyramidale was significantly improved in comparison to ischemia-operated group, with mean numbers of proper cells being 35 ± 19 and 20 ± 7, respectively, for subjects injected during ischemia or 30 min into reperfusion. Morphology of the CA2-4,DG region did not reveal change between the ischemia-operated, SFN-injected, and control groups.

We suggest that high levels of nuclear Nrf2 activity in CA2-4,DG may guarantee resistance of this region to I/R episode, while at the same time offering a potential explanation for the phenomenon of differential sensitivities of hippocampal regions. Our results are in line with the existing view that Nrf2 activation may represent a promising therapeutic strategy against cerebral ischemia.

The uniqueness of Nrf2 lies in its pleiotropic action and subsequent regulation of multiple cytoprotective pathways. This may support more efficient neuroprotection compared to single-target strategies.”

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12035-022-03166-x “Is Nrf2 Behind Endogenous Neuroprotection of the Hippocampal CA2-4,DG Region?”


Winter beach shock therapy

PXL_20230129_174306200

Eat mushrooms every day?

Three 2022 papers on amino acid ergothioneine, starting with a human study:

“We examined temporal relationships between plasma ergothioneine (ET) status and cognition in a cohort of 470 elderly subjects attending memory clinics in Singapore. All participants underwent baseline plasma ET measurements as well as neuroimaging for cerebrovascular disease (CeVD) and brain atrophy. Neuropsychological tests of cognition and function were assessed at baseline and follow-up visits for up to five years.

Lower plasma ET levels were associated with poorer baseline cognitive performance and faster rates of decline in function as well as in multiple cognitive domains including memory, executive function, attention, visuomotor speed, and language. In subgroup analyses, longitudinal associations were found only in non-demented individuals.

Mediation analyses showed that effects of ET on cognition seemed to be largely explainable by severity of concomitant CeVD, specifically white matter hyperintensities, and brain atrophy. Our findings support further assessment of plasma ET as a prognostic biomarker for accelerated cognitive and functional decline in pre-dementia and suggest possible therapeutic and preventative measures.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/11/9/1717 “Low Plasma Ergothioneine Predicts Cognitive and Functional Decline in an Elderly Cohort Attending Memory Clinics”


Earlier this year, two of the study’s coauthors put together a collection of 11 ergothioneine papers:

“One catalyst for this upsurge of interest was the discovery in 2005 of a transporter for ET (OCTN1, often now called the ergothioneine transporter, ETT), which accounts for the fact that animals (including humans) take up and avidly retain ET from the diet. The presence of a specific transporter together with the avid retention of ET in the body implies that this compound is important to us.

To quote an old phrase ‘correlation does not imply causation.’ Low ET levels may predispose to disease, but disease could also lead to low ET levels. Possible reasons could include:

  • Alterations in diet due to illness so that less ET is consumed;
  • Decreases in ETT activity in the gut (leading to less ET uptake) or kidney (impairing ET reabsorption) with age and disease.
  • Changes in gut microbiota might influence uptake and accumulation in the body.
  • ET is being consumed as it scavenges oxygen radicals and other reactive oxygen species, the production of which is known to increase in these diseases and during ageing in general.

Only the gold standard of placebo-controlled double-blinded clinical studies can definitively establish the value (if any) of ET in preventing or treating human disease. Several such trials are being planned or in progress; we await the results with interest, and a streak of optimism.”

https://febs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1873-3468.14350 “Ergothioneine, where are we now?”


One of the collection’s papers focused on what ETT research findings could or could not be replicated:

“ETT is not expressed ubiquitously and only cells with high ETT cell-surface levels can accumulate ET to high concentration. Without ETT, there is no uptake because the plasma membrane is essentially impermeable. We review substrate specificity and localization of ETT, which is prominently expressed in neutrophils, monocytes/macrophages, and developing erythrocytes.

Comparison of transport efficiency (TE) for acknowledged substrates of the ETT. Bar length represents approximate TE of wild-type human ETT.

feb214269-fig-0001-m

We have not found in the literature any other ET transporters. However, it is highly probable that additional ET transporters work in the human body:

  • Uptake of ET from the small intestine into epithelial cells occurs through apically localized ETT. The very hydrophilic ET cannot then exit these cells toward the blood without help – a basolateral efflux transporter is required.
  • After oral administration of 3H-ET, a considerable amount of ET was still absorbed into the body in the ETT KO [knockout] mice. There must be another transporter for apical uptake at least in the small intestine of the mouse.
  • When ET was administered intravenously, ETT KO mice showed no change in ET concentration in the brain compared to wild type. The little ET that enters the brain must therefore pass through the BBB via a different transporter.”

https://febs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1873-3468.14269 “The ergothioneine transporter (ETT): substrates and locations, an inventory”


It’s persuasive that there’s an evolutionarily conserved transmitter specific to ergothioneine. It isn’t persuasive that this compound once consumed is almost always in stand-by mode to do: what?

Ergothioneine isn’t a substitute for the related glutathione, especially since its supply isn’t similarly available from an endogenous source. It isn’t an active participant in day-to-day human life.

Still, I hedge my bets. I eat ergothioneine every day via white button mushrooms in AGE-less chicken vegetable soup at a cost of about $1.30.

PXL_20221210_191511270

What do we know about human aging from mouse models?

Here is a 2021 rodent study and relevant parts from 3 of its 26 citing papers:

“A long line of evidence has established the laboratory mouse as the prime model of human aging. However, relatively little is known about detailed behavioral and functional changes that occur across their lifespan, and how this maps onto the phenotype of human aging.

To better understand age-related changes across the lifespan, we characterized functional aging in male C57BL/6J mice of five different ages (3, 6, 12, 18, and 22 months of age) using a multi-domain behavioral test battery. Assessment of functional aging in humans and mice: age-related patterns were determined based on representative data (Table 2), and then superimposed onto survival rate. (A) Body weight, (B) locomotor activity, (C) gait velocity, (D) grip strength, (E) trait anxiety, (F) memory requiring low attention level, and (G) memory requiring high attention level.

fnagi-13-697621-g012

These functional alterations across ages are non-linear, and patterns are unique for each behavioral trait. Physical function progressively declines, starting as early as 6 months of age in mice, while cognitive function begins to decline later, with considerable impairment present at 22 months of age.

Functional aging of male C57BL/6J mice starts at younger relative ages compared to when it starts in humans. Our study suggests that human-equivalent ages of mice might be better determined on the basis of its functional capabilities.”

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2021.697621/full “Functional Aging in Male C57BL/6J Mice Across the Life-Span: A Systematic Behavioral Analysis of Motor, Emotional, and Memory Function to Define an Aging Phenotype”


“Studies in mice show that physical function (i.e., locomotor activity, gait velocity, grip strength) begins to deteriorate around post-natal day (PND) 180, but cognitive functions (i.e., memory) do not exhibit impairment until roughly PND 660. Our results should be considered within the context of behavior changing throughout vole adulthood. Caution should be taken to avoid categorizing the oldest age group in our study as ‘elderly’ or ‘geriatric.'”

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0276897 “Behavioral trajectories of aging prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster): Adapting behavior to social context wanes with advanced age”


“We used adult mice ranging in age from 5-6 months, not enough to modify experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis progression. Mice are considered adult after 8 weeks; however, rapid growth for most biological processes is observed until 3 months of age, while past 6 months, mice might be affected by senescence.”

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2022.1036680/full “Age related immune modulation of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in PINK1 knockout mice”


“Locomotor activity and gait velocity of 12 months old male C57BL/6 correlates with an elderly human being aged 60 or older, supporting that the ~15 months old mice we used in our study were aged mice at the time of tissue collection.”

https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/23/20/12461 “Genomic Basis for Individual Differences in Susceptibility to the Neurotoxic Effects of Diesel Exhaust”


PXL_20221122_200643133

Broccoli sprouts activate the AMPK pathway, Part 4

Today someone viewed the 2020 Part 3 of Broccoli sprouts activate the AMPK pathway which lacked citations at the time. Checking again, here are three citing 2022 papers, starting with a review:

“Nrf2 is an important transcription factor that regulates expression of a large number of genes in healthy and disease states. Nrf2 regulates expression of several key components of oxidative stress, mitochondrial biogenesis, mitophagy, autophagy, and mitochondrial function in all organs of the human body, and in the peripheral and central nervous systems.

Overall, therapeutic drugs including sulforaphane that target Nrf2 expression and Nrf2/ARE pathway are promising. This article proposes additional research in Nrf2’s role within Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, and ischemic stroke in preclinical mouse models and humans with age-related neurodegenerative diseases.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568163722001982 “Role of Nrf2 in aging, Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases” (not freely available) Thanks to Dr. P. Hemachandra Reddy for providing a copy.


One of the Part 3 study’s coauthors contributed to this very detailed review:

“Due to observed overlapping cellular responses upon AMPK or NRF2 activation and common stressors impinging on both AMPK and NRF2 signaling, it is plausible to assume that AMPK and NRF2 signaling may interdepend and cooperate to readjust cellular homeostasis.

1-s2.0-S089158492200497X-gr3_lrg

The outcome and underlying signaling events of AMPK-NRF2 crosstalk may diverge between:

  1. in vitro and in vivo studies (one cell type in isolation vs inter-organ crosstalk in living organisms);
  2. Different cell types/organs/organisms of different cultivation conditions, genetic background, age or sex;
  3. Different stress-regimens (chronic vs acute, nature of stress (lipotoxicity, redox stress, xenobiotic, starvation, etc));
  4. Different modes of Nrf2 or AMPK activation and inhibition (genetic vs pharmacological, constitutive vs transient/intermittent, systemic vs organ-specific, electrophilic vs PPI, allosteric vs covalent, or pan vs subtype-specific);
  5. Different target genes with distinct promoter and enhancer structure; or
  6. Different timing of activation.

The latter should deserve increased attention as Nrf2 is one of the most cycling genes under control of the circadian clock. Feeding behavior, metabolism and hence AMPK activity follow and substantiate the biological clock, indicating an entangled circadian regulation of metabolic and redox homeostasis.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089158492200497X “AMPK and NRF2: Interactive players in the same team for cellular homeostasis?”


A third citing paper was a study of lens cells that provided an example of similar metformin effects noted in Part 2 of Broccoli sprouts activate the AMPK pathway:

“Loss of Nrf2 and Nrf2 antioxidant genes expression and activity in aging cells leads to an array of oxidative-induced deleterious responses, impaired function, and aging pathologies. This deterioration is proposed to be the primary risk factor for age-related diseases such as cataracts.

AMPK regulates energy at physiological levels during metabolic imbalance and stress. AMPK is a redox sensing molecule, and can be activated under cellular accumulation of reactive oxygen species, which are endogenously produced due to loss of antioxidant enzymes.

The therapeutic potential of AMPK activation has context-dependent beneficial effects, from cell survival to cell death. AMPK activation was a requisite for Bmal1/Nrf2-antioxidants-mediated defense, as pharmacologically inactivating AMPK impeded metformin’s effect.

Using lens epithelial cell lines (LECs) of human or mouse aging primary LECs along with lenses as model systems, we demonstrated that metformin could correct deteriorated Bmal1/Nrf2/ARE pathway by reviving AMPK-activation and transcriptional activities of Bmal1/Nrf2, resulting in increased antioxidants enzymatic activity and expression of Phase II enzymes. Results uncovered crosstalk between AMPK and Bmal1/Nrf2/antioxidants mediated by metformin for blunting oxidative/aging-linked pathobiology.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/11/19/3021/htm “Obligatory Role of AMPK Activation and Antioxidant Defense Pathway in the Regulatory Effects of Metformin on Cellular Protection and Prevention of Lens Opacity”


PXL_20221027_185754842