Author: gettingwell4

Plasmalogens Week #2 – Childhood Development

gettingwell4 4-5 stars Advanced knowledge, Brain development, Immune system, Stress , , , ,

Continuing Plasmalogens Week with three 2025 papers, starting with a human study of plasmalogens’ effects of decreasing breastfed infants’ infections and inflammation:

“Mothers reported on breastfeeding and infant infections in questionnaires collected at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months post-birth. Parent-reported infection burden was defined as the total number of infant respiratory tract infections, gastroenteritis, conjunctivitis, and acute otitis media episodes reported by mothers between birth and 6 months for 6-month analyses, and between birth and 12 months for 12-month analyses.

We constructed a causal mediation model to estimate the proportion of effects explained by a direct effect of breastfeeding on inflammation, measured via glycoprotein acetyls (GlycA)—the average direct effect (ADE)—and the proportion that was mediated by metabolomic biomarkers/lipid—the average causal mediation effect (ACME).

Breastfeeding is negatively associated with GlycA, positively associated with plasmalogens, and plasmalogens are negatively associated with GlycA. However, the positive association between breastfeeding and plasmalogens is stronger than the negative direct association between breastfeeding and inflammation, resulting in an ACME that exceeds the total effect. This pattern indicates that plasmalogens may play a dominant role in mediating the relationship between breastfeeding and systemic inflammation.

We have recently developed a plasmalogen score that is associated with a range of cardiometabolic outcomes, including type 2 diabetes and CVD.

  • At 6 months, the plasmalogen score was estimated to mediate 162% of the total effect (proportion mediated: 1.62, i.e. average causal mediation effect (ACME) to total effect ratio of 1.62, resulting in a percentage > 100%) of breastfeeding on GlycA.
  • At 12 months, the plasmalogen score mediated an estimated 75% of the total effect of breastfeeding on GlycA.

Any breastfeeding, regardless of supplementary feeding, was associated with lower inflammation, fewer infections, and significant, potentially beneficial changes in metabolomic and lipidomic markers, particularly plasmalogens. There was evidence of bidirectional mediation: metabolomic biomarkers and lipids mediated breastfeeding’s effects on inflammation, while inflammation partly mediated breastfeeding’s impact on certain metabolites and lipids.”

https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-025-04343-0 “The protective effect of breastfeeding on infant inflammation: a mediation analysis of the plasma lipidome and metabolome”

Reference 48 was the 2024 plasmalogen score study.

A second study by many of the first study’s researchers used the same cohort as the first study to investigate effects of maternal obesity on infant obesity:

“We aimed to investigate associations between maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (pp-BMI), lipidomic profiles of mothers, human milk, and infants, and early life growth. We were particularly interested in ether lipids as they are higher in breastfed infants compared to formula-fed infants, are enriched in human milk compared to infant formula, and are involved in metabolic health and inflammation in adult populations.

Maternal plasmalogen score was negatively associated with pp-BMI and positively associated with plasmalogens in human milk and infant plasmalogen scores from birth to four years of age. We were unable to establish clear links between plasmalogen score and infant BMI within the first 4 years.

These findings position plasmalogens and ether lipids as potential biomarkers or intervention targets for reducing transmission of obesity from mother to infant. Optimising lipid profiles through reducing maternal pp-BMI and dietary or supplemental ether lipids may represent a novel strategy for mitigating early-life obesity risk.”

https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-7089146/v1 “Maternal BMI and infant obesity risk: a lipidomics perspective on the developmental origins of obesity”

There was a lot of hand waving and weasel-wording (i.e., could, may, potential, associated with) but little causal evidence in this preprint. Reference 42 was the preprint version of the first study.

A third paper investigated 9- to 12-year-olds’ plasmalogen levels and molecular types:

“The importance of plasmalogens (Pls) in several cellular processes is known, one of which is their protective effect against oxidative damage. The physiological role of Pls in human development has not been elucidated. This study is the first report on plasmalogen levels and molecular types in children’s plasma.

Ethanolamine plasmalogen (PlsEtn 16:0/20:5) and choline plasmalogen (PlsCho 16:0/20:5), both carrying eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, ω-3), were significantly lower in girls than in boys. There was no significant difference observed among the 9, 10, 11, and 12-year-old groups between girls and boys in their levels of PlsEtn 16:0/20:5. However, a significant decrease in the levels of PlsCho 16:0/20:5 was observed for 9, 10 and 12-year-old groups of girls compared to boys.

  • In both sexes, the plasmalogen levels for the 12-year-old children were lower than those for the 9-year-old children.
  • PlsCho (16:0/18:2) linoleic acid (ω-6)-derived was lower in the overweight children than in the normal-weight children for both sexes.
  • Arachidonic acid (ω-6)-containing PlsEtn (18:0/20:4) was the most abundant ethanolamine-type plasmalogen in both sexes.

This study has many limitations as follows:

  1. Non-fasting plasma samples were collected from the children’s plasma and used for analysis; since diet can influence Pls levels, the result may be affected by the sample collection method.
  2. Physical activity was also not monitored, which could have an influence on plasma levels, and
  3. A limited number of plasmalogen molecular species were quantified in this study.

A follow-up study may be essential to determine the plasma Pls in the same population when they are adolescents.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/15/6/743 “Application of Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Quantitative Analysis of Plasmalogens in Preadolescent Children—The Hokkaido Study”

Plasmalogens Week #1 – Overview

gettingwell4 2-3 stars Required further work, Immune system, Stress , , , , ,

It’s been a while since I curated plasmalogen papers. Let’s start out a week’s worth of 2025 papers with a review of plasmalogens as biomarkers:

“Reduced levels of plasmalogens in circulation or in cell membranes are associated with rare peroxisomal disorders, systemic disease, neurological impairment, cancer, and diseases of the heart, kidney, and liver. Roles for plasmalogens have been identified in lipid rafts, myelin, chlorolipids, bromolipids, hemostasis, cholesterol metabolism, and redox responses.

Plasmalogens account for approximately 5-20% of the phospholipids in mammalian cell membranes. Circulating choline and ethanolamine are incorporated into lipid membranes through the synthesis of plasmalogens. These lipids are formed through a separate multistep process involving precursors in the cytoplasm, peroxisome, and endoplasmic reticulum.

Cytochrome c (cyt-c) typically serves as an electron carrier in the mitochondrial membrane, but under oxidative stress, cyt-c undergoes a conformational alteration conferring peroxidase activity that cleaves the vinyl-ether linkage in plasmalogens. Plasmalogens may act as precursors to platelet-activating factor (PAF), and PAF can be enzymatically converted to plasmalogens. PAF is a potent pro-inflammatory mediator in cancer, cardiovascular, neurological, chronic and infectious disease, suggesting that increased PAF levels may inversely correspond to lower ethanolamine plasmalogen levels identified in human diseases.

Plasmalogens are abundant in myelin, and crucial to the function of central nervous system oligodendrocytes and peripheral nervous system Schwann cells in supporting neuronal action potential.

Catabolism of plasmalogens occurs in response to oxidative stress and activation of TLRs, which promote pro-inflammatory responses during disease progression. Release of fatty acids (e.g., arachidonic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid, docosahexaenoic acid) during plasmalogen catabolism can either exacerbate or resolve pro-inflammatory and thrombotic responses depending on the type of fatty acid released and mediator produced.

Continued research of the types of plasmalogens and plasmalogen precursors and their natural or synthetic sources, the frequency and amount of plasmalogens administered, the route of administration, and the timing of treatment is needed.”

https://www.jlr.org/article/S0022-2275(25)00188-9/fulltext “Plasmalogens as biomarkers and therapeutic targets”

A second review highlighted various strategies for regulating plasmalogen levels:

“Plasmalogens serve as significant structural components of cellular membranes, particularly enriched in tissues with high membrane trafficking. Plasmalogens are recognized as major reservoirs for polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), notably docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (AA). Incorporation of these PUFAs influences membrane physical properties, including fluidity and the propensity to form non-lamellar structures.

Effective delivery of plasmalogens or their precursors faces significant hurdles, including chemical instability (especially oxidation of the vinyl-ether bond), low oral bioavailability, and challenges in crossing biological barriers like the blood–brain barrier (BBB). Exploration of plasmalogen-based nanoparticles is currently quite limited.”

https://faseb.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1096/fba.2025-00010 “Plasmalogen as a Bioactive Lipid Drug: From Preclinical Research Challenges to Opportunities in Nanomedicine”

Yeah, no. Everything the public was told about lipid nanoparticles this decade was propaganda in service of an agenda. The real stories are gathered in papers I haven’t curated, such as Lipid Nanoparticles as Active Biointerfaces: From Membrane Interaction to Systemic Dysregulation.

Maternal intake of broccoli sprouts transfers to the fetus and infant

gettingwell4 2-3 stars Required further work ,

A 2025 human study investigated placental and breast milk sulforaphane content:

“Uncomplicated pregnant patients (n = 8) scheduled for elective caesarean sections (>37 weeks gestation) provided written and informed consent. A single oral dose of EnduraCell, a broccoli sprout extract (equivalent to 21 mg of sulforaphane), was administered prior to caesarean section. Baseline blood pressure, blood and urine were collected and again at time of operation, alongside umbilical cord blood (vein and artery) and placental samples.

2–4 days post-delivery, a second dose was administered. Two hours later, maternal bloods and breast milk were collected.

Unlike in the maternal circulation, sulforaphane levels did not show an obvious peak at the 2–3 h timepoint in the fetal umbilical vein serum and plasma or the umbilical artery serum and plasma.

A linear regression indicated that the percentage of fetal sulforaphane relative to the maternal concentration increased over time, showing progressive transfer from maternal to fetal circulation.

This is the first study to demonstrate the successful maternal-fetal transfer of sulforaphane through the placenta and into breast milk following exposure to a broccoli sprout extract during and after pregnancy. No adverse events or outcomes were reported from any of the participants, supporting the reassuring safety profile of an acute exposure to a broccoli sprout extract in pregnancy.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143400425006964 “Assessing the transplacental passage and breastmilk levels of broccoli sprout-derived sulforaphane”

1. These researchers incorrectly termed a commercially available broccoli sprout powder as an extract. Grinding up broccoli sprouts produces a different product than does processing broccoli seeds or sprouts using solvents into extracts.

2. They asserted the broccoli sprout powder was a 21 mg sulforaphane dose. A more realistic explanation should have been provided, since:

  • No sulforaphane measurements were taken to back their assertion, which is understandable because the powder contained glucoraphanin, sulforaphane’s precursor, and sulforaphane wouldn’t be expected to be found in the powder; and
  • Conversion of broccoli spout powder to sulforaphane would be dependent on each subject’s gut microbiota, which is different for each individual.

Here’s what How long does sulforaphane keep? said for the same broccoli sprout powder product:

“Per the manufacturer, each capsule contained 700 mg of 100% whole broccoli sprout powder, including active myrosinase and 21 mg of glucoraphanin, which upon full conversion to SFN would yield ∼8 mg, equaling ∼24 mg of SFN total per three-capsule dose. We note that full conversion to SFN, even with active myrosinase in the supplement, is not expected.”

3. Characterizing this minimal dose as “an acute exposure” mixed up its meaning with the common meaning of acute – “extremely sharp or severe; intense.”

4. Someday, researchers will be interested and forward-thinking enough about their field to plan ahead and investigate occurrences such as why both the highest and lowest maternal blood sulforaphane content didn’t translate into correspondingly ranked umbilical cord blood sulforaphane content.

5. Since blood contains up to 18,000 compounds, I don’t see where any other maternal blood compound wouldn’t pass to the fetus, unless it is definitively shown that the placenta specifically blocks it. It’s time to discard and disclaim any “safe and effective” propaganda with respect to pregnant women and breastfeeding mothers.

I found this study by it citing Eat broccoli sprouts for longevity.

A Nrf2 treatment for ALS?

gettingwell4 5+ stars Premium, Dopamine, Neurochemicals , ,

A 2025 rodent in vivo / human cell ex vivo study investigated effects of a Nrf2 activator on ALS rodent models and ALS human nervous system cells:

“M102 is a central nervous system (CNS) penetrant small molecule electrophile which activates in vivo the NF-E2 p45-related factor 2-antioxidant response element (NRF2-ARE) pathway, as well as transcription of heat-shock element (HSE) associated genes. Apart from the recent promising emergence of tofersen as a disease modifying therapy for the 2% of ALS patients who harbor mutations in the SOD1 gene, other approved drugs have only marginal effects on life expectancy (riluzole) or indices of disease progression (edaravone).

Data from disease model systems and from human biosamples provide strong evidence for a role of redox imbalance, inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and altered proteostasis, including autophagy and mitophagy, as four key drivers in the pathobiology of ALS. We demonstrate that M102 is a dual activator of NRF2 and HSF1 transcription factor pathways, two upstream master regulators of neuroprotective mechanisms, with the potential to modulate all four of these key drivers of neurodegeneration and with excellent penetration across the blood brain barrier.

Stress response of the KEAP1-Nrf2-ARE system is stronger in astrocytes compared to neurons. A body of evidence from in vitro and in vivo model systems and from post-mortem CNS tissue from ALS patients has indicated that the NRF2 response is impaired in ALS, and has also been shown to decline with age.

HSF1 is a stress-inducible transcription factor that is the key driver for expression of multiple heat shock proteins which act as chaperones responsible for correct folding of newly synthesized proteins, refolding of denatured proteins, and prevention of aggregation of misfolded proteins. However, to date, many small molecule activators of HSF-1 have shown undesirable properties e.g. by acting as Hsp90 inhibitors or by exerting direct proteotoxic effects.

M102 (S-apomorphine hydrochloride hemihydrate) is a proprietary new chemical entity (NCE) and the S-enantiomer of the marketed R-apomorphine (Apokyn®; pure R-enantiomer). The R-enantiomer is a dopamine agonist administered subcutaneously for management of advanced Parkinson’s disease. M102 is a very weak dopamine antagonist and does not show the adverse effects associated with dopamine agonism.

M102 treatment rescues motor neuron (MN) survival in co-cultures with C9, SOD1 and sporadic ALS patient-derived astrocytes. Other NRF2 activators have been investigated in clinical trials or have been approved for medical use. These include dimethylfumarate (DMF) (Tecfidera®, Biogen) and omaveloxolone (Reata, Biogen).

  • DMF was originally approved for the treatment of psoriasis (Fumaderm®) and was later repurposed for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (Tecfidera®). A phase 2 trial of DMF in ALS provided Class 1 evidence of safety at a dose of 480 mg/day and lack of disease-modifying efficacy. DMF treatment is associated with dose-limiting lymphopenia and flushing (Tecfidera® Prescribing Information).
  • Omaveloxolone (Skyclarys®) is a potent NRF2 activator that has been approved by the FDA and EMA for the treatment of Friedreich’s ataxia. By activating the NRF2 pathway, omaveloxolone ameliorates oxidative stress and improves mitochondrial function. As a potent NRF2 activator, omaveloxolone exhibited significant liver toxicity with elevated AST/ALT levels in 37% of patients exposed to a dose of 150 mg.
  • Toxicity has also been reported with other potent NRF2 activators, such as bardoxolone methyl (EC50: 53 nM) which showed significant heart, liver, and renal toxicity in humans.

In contrast, our preclinical toxicological studies indicate that M102 has a much higher safety margin in relation to liver toxicity. M102 has the potential to modulate multiple key drivers of neurodegeneration, increasing the chances of achieving impactful neuroprotection and disease modifying effects in ALS.

This comprehensive package of preclinical efficacy data across two mouse models as well as patient-derived astrocyte toxicity assays, provides a strong rationale for clinical evaluation of M102 in ALS patients. Combined with the development of target engagement biomarkers and the completed preclinical toxicology package, a clear translational pathway to testing in ALS patients has been developed.”

https://molecularneurodegeneration.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13024-025-00908-y “M102 activates both NRF2 and HSF1 transcription factor pathways and is neuroprotective in cell and animal models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis”

Combining exercise with sulforaphane

gettingwell4 5+ stars Premium, Epigenetics, Glutamate, Immune system, Neurochemicals, Stress ,

A 2025 clinical trial with old people compared NRF2 effects of acute exercise with pre- and post-exercise sulforaphane treatment:

“This study tested the hypothesis that combining acute exercise (in vivo stimulus) with ex vivo sulforaphane (SFN) treatment would induce greater NRF2 activation and signaling in older adults compared to either treatment alone. This approach was used to bypass the potential issue of inter-individual variability in metabolism and bioavailability of SFN supplementation through oral consumption and thereby provide more rigorous biological control to establish mechanistic feasibility.

Twenty-five older adults (12 men, 13 women; mean age: 67 ± 5 years) performed 30-min cycling exercise. Blood was drawn before and immediately after exercise to isolate peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and incubate with and without SFN (5 μM) treatment.

Acute exercise induced modest transcriptional changes across the four tested transcripts compared to the robust upregulation elicited by SFN. This disparity was notable given the comparable NRF2/ARE binding activity observed between EX and SFN.

Near-significant trends were observed for EX in heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), and glutathione reductase (GR) (after Bonferroni correction), while glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit (GCLC) was not induced by EX. In contrast, SFN alone robustly induced expression of NQO1, HO-1, GR, and GCLC.

We had chosen 5 μM as the dose based on pilot data from our laboratory and existing literature from in vitro experiments. However, typically, SFN is not combined with another stimulus.

To test this speculation, we ran a post hoc dose–response experiment where we stimulated PBMCs (n = 5) at six different SFN concentrations ranging from 0 to 20 μM (incubated for 5 h) and analyzed responses across the four genes used in the present study. The dose responses displayed hormetic curves for NQO1, GR, and GCLC, with 5 μM eliciting the peak response, suggesting that the lack of difference between SFN and the combined treatment was due to a ceiling effect of the SFN dose. Interestingly, HO-1 displayed a linear/curvilinear response with the maximal observed response at 20 μM.

In future ex vivo studies, a sulforaphane concentration of 1–2 μM in combination with acute exercise is predicted to enhance the expression of these antioxidant genes in the PBMCs of older adults to a greater extent than either treatment alone. Furthermore, lower SFN plasma concentrations are more likely to be achievable with oral supplementation.

To our knowledge, this is the first trial to measure responses to acute exercise combined with sulforaphane stimulation on NRF2 signaling in older men and women. We did not observe any statistically significant differences in any of our outcome variables between men and women.

Our results demonstrate that combining acute exercise with a sulforaphane stimulus elicits a greater response in nuclear NRF2 activity in older adults. While the response in gene expression did not completely mirror the response in NRF2 activation, it is important to note that NRF2 induces hundreds of cytoprotective genes. The four transcripts we measured are among those most commonly used to represent NRF2 signaling but do not capture the full picture. Full transcriptomics in future studies would address this question.”

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11357-025-01939-5 “Sulforaphane improves exercise-induced NRF2 signaling in older adults: an in vivo-ex vivo approach” (not freely available) Thanks to Dr. Tinna Traustadóttir for providing a copy.

I asked two questions, and will follow up with replies:

  1. Did a second experiment test effects of these subjects eating broccoli sprouts prior to acute exercise? The clinical trial’s NCT04848792 Study Overview section indicated that was the researchers’ intent.
  2. What studies have the data that produced this study’s graphical abstract’s younger vs. older NRF2 response graph?

Ancient DNA fragments enable adult neurogenesis

gettingwell4 4-5 stars Advanced knowledge, Epigenetics, Hippocampus, Limbic system, Memory , , , ,

A 2025 rodent study investigated mechanisms by which erythropoietin (EPO) enables adult neurogenesis and cognitive function:

“We mapped epigenomic and transcriptional landscapes of adult mouse hippocampus under recombinant human EPO (rhEPO) treatment. We discovered significant lineage-specific remodelling of chromatin accessibility predominantly in newly formed pyramidal neurons, highlighting a robust EPO-driven neurogenic response. Notably, transposable elements (TEs), particularly ancient LINEs and SINEs, emerged as critical cis-regulatory elements (cCREs).

EPO is known to be upregulated in the brain under hypoxic or injury conditions, and it has been considered a natural neuroprotective agent. We demonstrated that EPO, a traditionally hematopoietic hormone, can profoundly reprogram the adult neural epigenome to drive neurogenesis.

EPO may activate a specific subclass of dormant regulatory elements to drive nearby genes. Such a mechanism would represent a previously unappreciated mode of gene regulation: the de novo recruitment of ancient genomic elements to drive a contemporary cellular response.

Our data support the model that EPO drives differentiation of progenitors rather than inducing widespread cell division. The net effect is an enrichment of pyramidal neurons at the cost of interneurons. Pyramidal neurons integrate in the hippocampal circuitry, leading to potential implications for mood, memory, cognitive enhancement, and recovery from brain injury.

We propose a conserved evolutionary mechanism at play: ancient TEs embedded in the genome have been repurposed as cCREs in neural cells, and during an EPO-induced neurogenic stimulus, the brain taps into this reservoir of regulatory elements to rapidly reshape gene expression. In evolutionary terms, this represents an efficient strategy.”

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.10.13.682070v1.full “Transposable Element-Mediated Epigenomic Remodeling Drives Erythropoietin-Induced Neurogenesis in the Adult Hippocampus”

Activating Nrf2 pathways with sunlight

gettingwell4 2-3 stars Required further work, Epigenetics, Immune system, Stress , ,

A 2025 review subject was non-electrophilic Nrf2 activators:

“NRF2 can be induced via:

  1. Non-specific electrophile/ROS generation,
  2. Disruption of the NRF2–KEAP1 protein–protein interaction,
  3. Autophagy-mediated KEAP1 degradation,
  4. Direct modulation of NRF2 protein stability, and
  5. Post-transcriptional/post-translational modifications.

Except for a single intervention, therapeutic hypothermia, every non-pharmacological strategy with defined mechanisms employs more than one of these routes, most frequently pairing post-translational modification with either protein-stability regulation or limited electrophile production. This combinatorial activation elevates both NRF2 abundance and transcriptional competence while minimizing the liabilities of purely electrophilic agents and circumventing the efficacy limitations.

Classical electrophilic NRF2 activators, despite potent activation potential, exhibit paradoxically reduced therapeutic efficacy relative to single antioxidants, attributable to concurrent oxidative stress generation, glutathione depletion, mitochondrial impairment, and systemic toxicity. Although emerging non-electrophilic pharmacological activators offer therapeutic potential, their utility remains limited by bioavailability and suboptimal potency.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/14/9/1047 “Non-Electrophilic Activation of NRF2 in Neurological Disorders: Therapeutic Promise of Non-Pharmacological Strategies”

These researchers exaggerated problems of electrophilic Nrf2 activators such as “mitochondrial impairment, and systemic toxicity” so they could have something to write about. Just like every intervention, the dose determines the response. I can’t imagine not eating broccoli sprouts in favor of brain zapping with electroconvulsive therapy or transcranial magnetic stimulation just to avoid sulforaphane’s temporary mild oxidative stress that activates Nrf2 for 15-20 minutes.

But there are limitations to how an unwell person can benefit from Nrf2 activation. For example, I haven’t curated many cancer papers because healthy body functioning can’t be assumed.

I walk the beach at sunrise, weather permitting, because it makes me feel good, and I’m always happy afterwards that I made the effort to get outside. That doing so combines two of the above non-electrophilic Nrf2 activators, physical exercise and photobiomodulation, hasn’t been a consideration.

These reviewers didn’t include human studies of sunlight’s effects. Nevermind that hospitals used to have sundecks for patients, and John Ott published relevant human and animal studies over fifty years ago.

Many studies have an undisclosed limitation in that they were performed without controlling for light. For example, knowing that mitochondria are light-activated, I don’t trust those studies’ in vivo, ex vivo, or in vitro results.

None of the 100 most recent 2025 photobiomodulation papers examined natural sunlight. Maybe it wouldn’t sell red light, green light, and blue light lasers and other products to show that people could produce the same effects themselves with sunlight at different times of the day? Would researchers damage their reputations to study a freely-available intervention, one where they don’t “do something”?

Sulforaphane and malaria

gettingwell4 4-5 stars Advanced knowledge, Glutamate, Neurochemicals, Stress

A 2025 rodent study investigated sulforaphane’s capability as an adjunct with standard treatment to inhibit resistant malaria strains:

“In this study, we performed proteomic analysis on a range of sensitive and artemisinin-resistant parasites, revealing specific dysregulation of PfK13 protein abundance. Reduced PfK13 levels were linked to impaired hemoglobin digestion, decreased free heme levels, and consequently, decreased artemisinin activation. Artemisinin resistant parasites also exhibited elevated thiol levels, indicating a more reduced cellular state.

Modulation of PfK13 levels or localisation modifies glutathione (GSH) levels, and elevated GSH decreases artemisinin potency. Elevated levels of reduced GSH and its precursor γ-glutamyl cysteine (gGlu-Cys) were observed in resistant parasites, while oxidised glutathione (GSSG) was lower.

In mammalian cells, SFN conjugates GSH, either passively or through the activity of glutathione-S-transferases, and the SFN-GSH conjugate causes oxidative stress. In response to this stress, Nrf2 translocates to the nucleus and interacts with the antioxidant response element (ARE) of target genes, resulting in expression of antioxidant genes, which induces an antioxidant response. However, P. falciparum has no identified Nrf2 orthologue and so likely lacks a KEAP1-Nrf2 mediated antioxidant response, which suggests that the SFN-GSH conjugate should only cause oxidative stress in parasites.

SFN has antioxidant properties for the host through activation of Nrf2. Therefore our molecule of choice would not only kill the parasite, but will boost the host antioxidant capacity. This differs from most other available pro-oxidants, which do not have this host antioxidant capacity.

5mg/kg SFN was found to be sufficient to significantly prolong the survival of artesunate-treated mice infected with parasites.

PfK13 mutations drive artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium parasites by enhancing antioxidant defences, which can be targeted by redox modulators such as sulforaphane. By leveraging SFN’s ability to induce oxidative stress and deplete thiol levels in parasites, this approach can enhance the efficacy of artemisinin and potentially restore its effectiveness against resistant strains.”

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.10.05.680568v1.full “PfK13-associated artemisinin resistance slows drug activation and enhances antioxidant defence, which can be overcome with sulforaphane”

Sulforaphane and skin aging

gettingwell4 0-1 star Wasted resources, Epigenetics, Immune system, Stress

A 2025 rodent study investigated sulforaphane effects on natural skin aging:

“Aging is a multifactorial process that progressively impairs skin integrity by diminishing dermal fibroblast function, which is macroscopically manifested by wrinkling, laxity, and pigmentary abnormalities. The potential mechanism by which sulforaphane (SFN) delays intrinsic skin aging was explored through skin proteomic sequencing and immune cell infiltration analysis. Associations between SFN administration and phenotypic changes in skin aging, immune cell populations, and key signaling pathway targets were further examined.

WBC count results indicated that mice from the Aged group were significantly immunosuppressed. T cells occupied the main lymphocyte lineages.

The present study illuminated the skin protective mechanism of SFN by network pharmacology and proteomics analyses in a natural aging mouse model. SFN therapy showed significant alterations in skin structure, redox balance, and composition of immune cell populations after an intervention duration of 2 months.”

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mnfr.70281 “Integrative Network Pharmacology and Proteomics Decipher the Immunomodulatory Mechanism of Sulforaphane Against Intrinsic Skin Aging” (not freely available)

I rated this study Wasted resources for using sulforaphane doses not relevant to humans. I usually don’t curate such studies. Its lowest sulforaphane 50 mg/day dose is a ((50 mg * .081) * 70 kg) = 284 mg human equivalent.

I decided to curate it for its informative young controls vs. aged controls results in the above graphic. WBC counts are available on almost every standard human blood test.

This study’s young and aged groups per Grok: “A 2-month-old mouse aging for two more months (reaching 4 months) is approximately equivalent to a human aging from about 12–15 years to 17–21 years old. An 18-month-old mouse (human equivalent: ~45–50 years) aging for two months would be roughly equivalent to a human aging from ~45–50 years to ~51–58 years.”

Sulforaphane and migraines

gettingwell4 4-5 stars Advanced knowledge, Brainstem, Lower brain

A 2025 rodent study compared protective effects of sulforaphane and a migraine compound on nitroglycerin-induced migraines:

“Activation of trigeminal vascular pathways and the release of calcitonin gene‐related peptide (CGRP) are central to migraine pathogenesis. The amylin‐1 (AMY1) receptor is expressed in key structures implicated in migraine mechanisms.

This study evaluated protective effects of sulforaphane (SFN) against nitroglycerin induced migraine in female mice, comparing its efficacy to the standard migraine medication, topiramate. Migraine was induced using nitroglycerin (10 mg/kg, i.p., administered every other day), and treatments included sulforaphane (5 mg/kg/day, i.p.) or topiramate (30 mg/kg/day, i.p.) for a duration of 9 days.

Sulforaphane demonstrated significant improvements in behavioral symptoms such as photophobia, head grooming, and both mechanical and thermal allodynia. These behavioral changes were accompanied by reductions in serum levels of nitric oxide, CGRP, and pro‐inflammatory cytokines.

Histological analysis revealed that sulforaphane ameliorated nitroglycerin-induced damage in the trigeminal ganglia and trigeminal nucleus caudalis. Additionally, sulforaphane reduced AMY1 receptor expression in the medulla and inhibited its downstream signaling components, including phosphorylated ERK1/2, P38, and c‐Fos. Sulforaphane further enhanced the Nrf2/HO‐1 pathway while suppressing the NF‐κB/NLRP3/caspase‐1 signaling cascade.

These findings indicate that SFN has a potential as a novel therapeutic candidate for migraine management by targeting the downstream signaling pathways of the AMY1 receptor.”

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ardp.70107 “The Role of the AMY1 Receptor Signaling Cascade in the Protective Effect of Sulforaphane Against Nitroglycerin-Induced Migraine in Mice” (not freely available)

This study’s Reference 34 was a 2016 study curated in Do broccoli sprouts treat migraines?.

Glucosinolate and isothiocyanate human interventions

gettingwell4 2-3 stars Required further work, Epigenetics, Immune system, Stress ,

A 2025 review covered human evidence from glucosinolate and isothiocyanate research through April 2025:

“Glucosinolates (GSLs) and their breakdown products, isothiocyanates (ITCs), are biogenesis compounds with anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticancer properties, mediated through key pathways such as Nrf2, NF‐κB, and epigenetic regulation. However, their limited and variable bioavailability remains a key challenge. This review summarises the current clinical evidence on GSLs and ITCs, with a focus on their health effects and metabolic fate in humans.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/14/16/2876 “Bioavailability, Human Metabolism, and Dietary Interventions of Glucosinolates and Isothiocyanates: Critical Insights and Future Perspectives”

In the above graphic, notice how the inactive myrosinase column has no small intestine participation, but the active myrosinase column does. This point wasn’t adequately emphasized, that for complete effects, an individual has to do whatever they can to thoroughly chew or otherwise activate myrosinase to hydrolyze glucosinolates before swallowing.

Researchers don’t rely on individuals taking responsibility for their own health, of course. Just swallow these pills, we’ll do it for you, as if humans are lab rats. This lack of emphasis is understandable, if not optimal.

This review provided longish coverage of studies, which is preferable to the usual treatment of citing a reference without much explanation. Compare, for example, my longish curation of the 2023 Eat broccoli sprouts for your high intensity interval training with its reference 68 summary below:

“Another study investigated the effects of consuming GSL-rich broccoli sprout (GRS) supplements on oxidative stress and physiological adaptations to intense exercise training. In a randomised, double-blind, crossover design, nine healthy participants consumed either a GRS supplement (75 g of sprouts) or a placebo twice daily over a 7-day high-intensity interval training period. The findings revealed that GRS supplementation significantly reduced markers of oxidative stress, including carbonylated proteins in skeletal muscle and plasma myeloperoxidase levels, compared to the placebo condition. Furthermore, GRS intake led to reduced lactate accumulation during submaximal exercise and enhanced exercise performance, as indicated by a longer time to exhaustion during maximal exercise tests. At the molecular level, supplementation with GRS was associated with elevated Nrf2 protein levels in muscle tissue, suggesting activation of endogenous antioxidant defence mechanisms. In addition, GRS intake mitigated nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes and lowered average blood glucose levels, indicating improved glucose regulation during intense training. Collectively, these results suggest that GRS supplementation may enhance physiological adaptations to high-intensity exercise by reducing oxidative stress and supporting metabolic homeostasis.”

Oats sprouts treat gut inflammation

gettingwell4 4-5 stars Advanced knowledge, Immune system, Stress

A 2025 rodent study investigated differing effects of regular oats and oat sprouts to treat induced colitis:

“This study aims to test our hypothesis that germinated oats exert stronger anti-inflammatory effects than raw oats due to their higher levels of bioactive phytochemicals. First, the nitric oxide (NO) production assay was used to screen [22] commercially available oat seed products and identify the product with the highest anti-inflammatory activity after germination [for five days]. The selected oat seed product was then produced in larger quantities and further evaluated in an in vivo study using the dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis mouse model to compare the anti-inflammatory effects of phytochemical extracts from germinated and raw oats.

The guideline states that for a healthy U.S.-style dietary pattern at a 2000 calorie level, a daily intake of 6 ounces of grains is recommended, with at least 3 ounces (84 g) coming from whole grains (WGs). For a 60 kg human, consuming 3 ounces of WGs per day translates to a 17.2 g/kg daily dose in mice. Given that the daily food intake of a 20 g mouse is approximately 2.5 g, the 17.2 g/kg daily dose corresponds to 14% of the total diet as WGs. Therefore, the 7 and 21% WG equivalent doses used in this study are relevant to human consumption.

Germination led to an overall increase in the content of all avenanthramides (AVAs) and avenacins (AVCs) as well as some avenacosides (AVEs):

  • For AVAs, the compounds 2c, 2p, 2f, 2cd, 2pd, and 2fd significantly increased by 10.0-, 6.3-, 9.6-, 20.7-, 10.6-, and 4.6-fold, respectively, which is consistent with previous reports.
  • This study is the first to report an increase in AVCs after germination, with AVC-A2, B2, A1, and B1 contents significantly increasing by 2.5-, 2.2-, 3.6-, and 4.2-fold, respectively.
  • Although germination resulted in a decrease in certain AVEs, it significantly increased the levels of AVE-C, Iso-AVE-A, AVE-E, and AVE-F by 1.8-, 3.3-, 3.3-, and 5.0-fold, respectively. Notably, AVE-E has been previously reported to have the strongest anti-inflammatory activity among all of the major AVEs.

In summary, germination enhances the anti-inflammatory properties of oats in both cells and DSS-induced colitis in mice by increasing levels of bioactive phytochemicals. Correlation analysis showed a significant inverse relationship between pro-inflammatory cytokines and phytochemical content in feces, especially AVAs and their microbial metabolites.

The observation of a stronger anti-inflammatory effect in the low-dose germinated oat group compared with the high-dose group is intriguing and warrants further investigation. One possible explanation is the phenomenon of hormesis, where low doses of bioactive compounds can exert beneficial effects, while higher doses may lead to diminished efficacy or even adverse effects. Further studies involving a broad range of doses would be valuable to define the effective intake range and provide insight into the underlying mechanisms.

It is possible that AVAs, AVEs, and AVCs act synergistically to enhance the overall anti-inflammatory efficacy, potentially by targeting different inflammatory pathways or modulating each other’s bioavailability and activity. Further investigation into the synergistic interactions among these compounds is warranted.”

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jafc.5c02993 “Phytochemical-Rich Germinated Oats as a Novel Functional Food To Attenuate Gut Inflammation”

I’ve eaten 3-day-old Avena sativa oat sprouts (started from 20 grams of groats) every day for 4.5 years now, and haven’t had gut problems. Here’s what they looked like this morning:

Get a little stress into your life, Part 2

gettingwell4 5+ stars Premium, Cortisol, Epigenetics, Hypothalamus, Immune system, Limbic system, Memory, Neurochemicals, Stress , , , , ,

A 2025 reply to a letter to the editor cited 56 references to elaborate on Part 1 and related topics:

“A positive effect does not necessarily mean benefit, and positive effects on individual organisms may mean adverse effects on other coexisting organisms. However, a vast literature shows that hormetic stimulation can result in benefits depending on the context, for instance, clear growth, yield, and survival improvement.

There is some energetic cost to support hormetic stimulation, with a likely positive energy budget, which might also have negative consequences if there is insufficient energy substrate, especially under concurrent severe environmental challenges. Moreover, hormetic preconditioning could be particularly costly when there is a mismatch between the predicted environment and the actual environment the same individuals or their offspring might face in the future.

Hormesis should not be unilaterally linked to positive and beneficial effects without considering dose levels. For any research to answer the question of whether a stimulation represents hormesis and whether it is beneficial, robust dose–response evaluations are needed, which should be designed a priori for this purpose, meeting the requirements of the proper number, increment, and range of doses.

Both additivity and synergism are possible in the hormetic stimulatory zone, depending also on the duration of exposure and the relative ratio of different components. This might happen, for example, when a chemical primes stress pathways (e.g., heat shock proteins and antioxidants), thus enabling another chemical to trigger hormesis (defense cross-activation) and/or because combined low subtoxicity may modulate receptors (e.g., aryl hydrocarbon receptor and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2) differently than individual exposures (receptor binding synergy).

Moreover, even when stimulation occurs in the presence of individual components, stimulation may no longer be present when combined, and therefore, effects of mixtures cannot be accurately predicted based on the effects of individual components. There may be hormesis trade-offs; hormesis should be judged based on fitness-critical end points.

While often modeled mathematically, hormesis is fundamentally a dynamic biological process and should not be seen as a purely mathematical function, certainly not a linear one. Much remains to be learned about the role of hormesis in global environmental change, and an open mind is needed to not miss the forest for the trees.”

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c05892 “Correspondence on ‘Hormesis as a Hidden Hand in Global Environmental Change?’ A Reply”

Reference 38 was a 2024 paper cited for:

“Hormetic-based interventions, particularly priming (or preconditioning), do not weaken organisms but strengthen them, enhancing their performance and health under different environmental challenges, which are often more massive than the priming exposure.

The catabolic aspect of hormesis is primarily protective whereas the anabolic aspect promotes growth, and their integration could optimize performance and health. The concept of preconditioning has also gained widespread attention in biomedical sciences.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1568163724004069 “The catabolic – anabolic cycling hormesis model of health and resilience” (not freely available)

Reference 40 was a 2021 review that characterized hormesis as a hallmark of health:

“Health is usually defined as the absence of pathology. Here, we endeavor to define health as a compendium of organizational and dynamic features that maintain physiology.

Biological causes or hallmarks of health include features of:

  • Spatial compartmentalization (integrity of barriers and containment of local perturbations),
  • Maintenance of homeostasis over time (recycling and turnover, integration of circuitries, and rhythmic oscillations), and
  • An array of adequate responses to stress (homeostatic resilience, hormetic regulation, and repair and regeneration).

Disruption of any of these interlocked features is broadly pathogenic, causing an acute or progressive derailment of the system.

A future ‘medicine of health’ might detect perilous trajectories to intercept them by targeted interventions well before the traditional ‘medicine of disease’ comes into action.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867420316068 “Hallmarks of Health”

Sulforaphane as a senotherapy, Part 2

gettingwell4 4-5 stars Advanced knowledge, Brain development, Cerebrum, Hippocampus, Limbic system, Memory, Stress , ,

A 2025 rodent study by the same group as Part 1 investigated similar subjects from a different experimental angle of senotherapy effects on brain and behavior rather than cardioprotective effects of dasatinib / quercetin (a senolytic combination) and sulforaphane (senomorphic):

“This is the first study to analyze the effect of senotherapy in the brain of a model of chronic obesity in middle-aged female rats. D + Q reduced the pro-inflammatory cytokines evaluated in the obesity model. It did not improve memory and learning nor the expression of molecules associated with the maintenance of synapses.

In contrast, sulforaphane (SFN), which without eliminating senescent cells, decreased pro-inflammatory factors, increased IL-10, as well as brain-derived neurotrophic factor BDNF, synaptophysin (SYP), and postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD-95), which, in turn, were associated with an improvement in behavioral tests in obese rats. This suggests that modulating the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), rather than eliminating senescent cells, might have better effects.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014488625001955 “Senotherapy as a multitarget intervention in chronic obesity: Modulation of senescence, neuroinflammation, dysbiosis, and synaptic integrity in middle-aged female Wistar rats”