Neurodegenerative disease

Taurine and mitochondrial health

gettingwell4 4-5 stars Advanced knowledge, Immune system, Stress

A 2025 review subject was taurine’s beneficial effects on mitochondria:

“Taurine has multiple and complex functions in protecting mitochondria against oxidative-nitrosative stress. We introduce a novel potential role for taurine in protecting from deuterium (heavy hydrogen) toxicity. This can be of crucial impact to either normal or cancer cells that have highly different mitochondrial redox status.

Deuterium is an isotope of hydrogen with a neutron as well as a proton, making it about twice as heavy as hydrogen. We first explain the important role that the gut microbiome and gut sulfomucin barrier play in deuterium management. We describe synergistic effects of taurine in the gut to protect against deleterious accumulation of deuterium in mitochondria, which disrupts ATP synthesis by ATPase pumps.

Taurine’s derivatives, N-chlorotaurine (NCT) and N-bromotaurine (NBrT), produced through spontaneous reaction of taurine with hypochlorite and hypobromite, have fascinating regulatory roles to protect from oxidative stress and beyond. We describe how taurine could potentially alleviate deuterium stress, primarily through metabolic collaboration among various gut microflora to produce deuterium depleted nutrients and deuterium depleted water (DDW), and in this way protect against leaky gut barrier, inflammatory bowel disease, and colon cancer.

Taurine cannot be metabolized by human cells, but gut microbes are able to break it down to release sulfite, which then gets oxidized to sulfate anions that become available to support synthesis of sulfomucins. Taurine protects against many diseases linked to mitochondrial defects, such as aging, metabolic syndrome, cancer, cardiovascular diseases and neurological disorders.

We present a novel view that gut microbes play an essential role in providing deuterium depleted (deupleted) nutrients, especially, butyrate, to the host colonocytes forming the gut barrier. We propose that sulfomucins synthesized by goblet cells not only protect the barrier from pathogens, but also trap and sequester deuterium, thus reducing mitochondrial deuterium levels, resulting in improved mitochondrial health.

Due to taurine, redox buffer glutathione (GSH) further stabilizes the membrane potential. GSH not only reduces radical oxygen species (ROS) during oxidative stress, but it also assists in production of deupleted water in mitochondria.

Spontaneous oxidation of two GSH molecules to produce GSSG in the presence of hydrogen peroxide yields two molecules of DDW. Just as for glutathione, bilirubin can produce DDW indefinitely through chronic recycling between bilirubin and biliverdin, capturing a deupleted proton in NADPH to produce a DDW molecule in each cycle.

A novelty that arises from this investigation is introduction of the role that deuterium plays in mitochondrial disease, and ways in which taurine may facilitate maintenance of low deuterium in mitochondrial ATPase pumps. Excess deuterium causes a stutter in the pumps, which leads to inefficiencies in ATP production and an increase in ROS.”

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11717795/ “Taurine prevents mitochondrial dysfunction and protects mitochondria from reactive oxygen species and deuterium toxicity”

Eat broccoli sprouts for your eyes, Part 3

gettingwell4 4-5 stars Advanced knowledge, Cerebellum, Epigenetics, Hippocampus, Limbic system, Lower brain, Stress , , , ,

Two 2025 papers cited Precondition your defenses with broccoli sprouts, starting with a review of age-related macular degeneration:

“AMD progression from intermediate to late AMD leads to a point of irreversible retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) degeneration where treatment becomes worthless. Treating patients at the early/intermediate stages presents a better therapeutic window opportunity for AMD as the disease could potentially be prevented or slowed down.

Strong evidence points to RPE dysfunction at these stages, mainly through redox imbalance and lysosomal dysfunction in RPE oxidative injury. Restoring oxidative balance and lysosomal function may act as preventive and therapeutic measures against RPE dysfunction and degeneration.

Due to interaction with KEAP1, NRF2 is a ubiquitously expressed protein with a high turnover and half-life of about 20 minutes. Because the turnover of NRF2 is faster than KEAP1, newly synthesized NRF2 does not have free KEAP1 to bind and is translocated into the nucleus. Once in the nucleus, NRF2 dimerizes with sMAF and the complex binds to antioxidant response element (ARE) sequences, promoting the expression of ARE genes.

There is NRF2 involvement in most of the hallmarks of aging. Key transcriptional regulatory factors of related pathways, such as transcription factor EB (TFEB) and NRF2, may be targeted to restore homeostasis and/or prevent further RPE degeneration.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/14/5/596 “Targeting Lysosomal Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress in Age-Related Macular Degeneration”

There were other informative tidbits throughout this review, such as:

  • “Anti-inflammatory effects of most electrophilic NRF2 activators are thought to be at least partly NRF2-independent, suggesting that these compounds lacking specificity may be advantageous for multitargeted pathologies.
  • TFEB can activate NRF2 under conditions devoid of oxidative stress.”

This paper also cited Bridging Nrf2 and autophagy when discussing the above graphic.

In this human cell and rodent study, several coauthors of the original 2020 study tested sulforaphane and TFEB interactions for ameliorating effects of a rare disease:

“Mutations in genes encoding lysosomal proteins could result in more than approximately 70 different lysosomal storage disorders. Niemann–Pick disease type C (NPC) is a rare lysosomal storage disorder caused by mutation in either NPC1 or NPC2 gene. Deficiency in NPC1 or NPC2 protein results in late endosomal/lysosomal accumulation of unesterified cholesterol.

Clinical symptoms of NPC include hepatosplenomegaly, progressive neurodegeneration, and central nervous system dysfunction, that is, seizure, motor impairment, and decline of intellectual function. So far there is no FDA-approved specific therapy for NPC.

Under stress conditions, that is, starvation or oxidative stress, TFEB is dephosphorylated and actively translocates into the nucleus, promoting expression of genes associated with lysosome and autophagy. TFEB overexpression or activation results in increased number of lysosomes, autophagy flux, and exocytosis.

Pharmacological activation of TFEB by sulforaphane (SFN), a previously identified TFEB agonist, significantly promoted cholesterol clearance in human and mouse NPC cells, while genetic inhibition (KO) of TFEB blocked SFN-induced cholesterol clearance. This clearance effect exerted by SFN was associated with upregulated lysosomal exocytosis and biogenesis. SFN treatment has no effect on the liver and spleen enlargement of Npc1 mice.

SFN is reportedly BBB-permeable, assuring a good candidate for efficient delivery to the brain, which is essential for targeting neurodegenerative phenotypes in neurological diseases including NPC. This is the first time that SFN was shown to directly activate TFEB in the brain.

Collectively, our results demonstrated that pharmacological activation of TFEB by a small-molecule agonist can mitigate NPC neuropathological symptoms in vivo. TFEB may be a putative target for NPC treatment, and manipulating lysosomal function via small-molecule TFEB agonists may have broad therapeutic potential for NPC.”

https://elifesciences.org/articles/103137 “Small-molecule activation of TFEB alleviates Niemann–Pick disease type C via promoting lysosomal exocytosis and biogenesis”

Nrf2 activators and transcriptomic clocks

gettingwell4 2-3 stars Required further work, Epigenetics, Stress , , , , ,

Two preprint studies looked at making transcriptional aging clocks using Nrf2 activators. Let’s start with a 2025 nematode study that used constant exposure to sulforaphane at different concentrations:

“To explore the potential of sulforaphane as a candidate natural compound for promoting longevity more generally, we tested the dose and age-specific effects of sulforaphane on C. elegans longevity, finding that it can extend lifespan by more than 50% at the most efficacious doses, but that treatment must be initiated early in life to be effective. We then created a novel, gene-specific, transcriptional aging clock, which demonstrated that sulforaphane-treated individuals exhibited a “transcriptional age” that was approximately four days younger than age-matched controls, representing a nearly 20% reduction in biological age.

The clearest transcriptional responses were detoxification pathways, which, together with the shape of the dose-response curve, indicates a likely hormetic response to sulforaphane. The hormetic, stress-pathway inducing properties of sulforaphane may indicate that many beneficial dietary supplements work in a fairly generic fashion as mild toxins rather than being driven by the biochemical properties of the compounds themselves (e.g., as antioxidants).

These results support the idea that robust longevity-extending interventions can act via global effects across the organism, as revealed by systems level changes in gene expression.”

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.05.11.653363v1 “The broccoli derivative sulforaphane extends lifespan by slowing the transcriptional aging clock”

There are difficulties in researchers translating nematode studies to mammals and humans. Nematodes lack a homolog to the Keap1 protein, which is sulforaphane’s main mammalian target to activate Nrf2.

A 2024 study developed various mammalian epigenetic clocks:

“A unified transcriptomic model of mortality that encompasses both aging and various models of lifespan-shortening and longevity interventions (i.e., mortality clocks) has been lacking. We conducted an RNA-seq analysis of mice subjected to 20 compound treatments in the Interventions Testing Program (ITP).

We sequenced the transcriptomes of a large cohort of ITP mice subjected to various neutral and longevity interventions, expanded the dataset with publicly available gene expression data representing organs of mice and rats across various strains and lifespan-regulating interventions, connected these models with survival data, and performed a meta-analysis of aggregated 4,539 rodent samples, which allowed us to identify multi-tissue transcriptomic signatures of aging, mortality rate, and maximum lifespan.

Aging and mortality were characterized by upregulation of genes involved in inflammation, complement cascade, apoptosis, and p53 pathway, while oxidative phosphorylation, fatty acid metabolism, and mitochondrial translation were negatively associated with mortality, both before and after adjustment for age.

Utilizing the aggregated dataset, we developed rodent multi-tissue transcriptomic clocks of chronological age, lifespan-adjusted age, and mortality. While the chronological clock could distinguish the effect of detrimental genetic and dietary models, it did not show a decrease in biological age in response to longevity interventions. In contrast, clocks of lifespan-adjusted age and mortality both captured aging-associated dynamics and correctly predicted the effect of lifespan-shortening and extending interventions.

Transcriptomic biomarkers developed in this study provide an opportunity to identify interventions promoting or counteracting molecular mechanisms of mortality, and characterize specific targets associated with their effects at the level of cell types, intracellular functional components, and individual genes. Our study underscores the complexity of aging and mortality mechanisms, the interplay between various processes involved, and the clear potential for developing therapies to extend healthspan and lifespan.”

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.07.04.601982v1.full “Transcriptomic Hallmarks of Mortality Reveal Universal and Specific Mechanisms of Aging, Chronic Disease, and Rejuvenation”

This second study’s references included an ITP study curated in Astaxanthin and aging, which stated:

“Despite the fact that the average diet contained 1840 ppm astaxanthin (only 46% of the target), median lifespans of male UM-HET3 mice were significantly improved. Amounts of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) in the diet averaged 35% of the target dose, which may explain the absence of lifespan effects.”

So screw-ups in making both astaxanthin and DMF mouse chows ended up with study data that didn’t measure the full lifespan impacts of activating transcription factor Nrf2. I’ll assert that such faulty data may have deviated this second study by downplaying Nrf2 activation’s impact on aging, chronic disease, and rejuvenation.

Sponsors may be less likely to be presented sulforaphane and other Nrf2 activator candidates for future aging and chronic disease studies as this first study suggests, thinking that these have already been studied in mammals. Well, maybe these compounds haven’t been accurately studied. There’s no effective way to fix a rodent study’s missing DMF Nrf2 data and faulty astaxanthin Nrf2 data to train an epigenetic clock in this second study.

I could be wrong about this second study using faulty astaxanthin Nrf2 data. It was cited as Reference 27 in the Introduction as an ITP study, but not specifically cited in the Method section. I don’t know how findings such as one of Nrf2’s target genes (“Remarkably, one of the top genes positively associated with maximum lifespan and negatively associated with chronological age and expected mortality was Gpx1, encoding the selenoprotein glutathione peroxidase 1″) and a Nrf2 specific pathway (Phase II) (“Pathways positively associated with lifespan and negatively with mortality, both before and after adjustment for age, included..xenobiotic metabolism..”) were made without Reference 27. Neither of the above studies has been peer reviewed yet.

The third phase of reversing aging and immunosenescent trends

gettingwell4 5+ stars Premium, Brain development, Epigenetics, Immune system , , , ,

Here’s a 2025 interview with Dr. Greg Fahy:

“We found that we could statistically demonstrate thymic regeneration morphologically on single individuals at single time points. MRI changes really are detecting shifts from the fatty tissue infiltration state of the involuted thymus to the regenerated thymus with functional thymic epithelial cells.

When you go through puberty your thymus involutes so you don’t have much left even when you’re 40. Essentially the process consists of loss of functional thymic mass and replacement of that functional thymic mass with adipose tissue, that’s what thymic involution is. It continues throughout life, but you retain a small amount of functional thymic mass all the way out to the age of 107.

The function of the thymus is to essentially manufacture half of your immune system. You have precursor cells arise from the bone marrow. They either go into the meiotic lineage and turn into the innate immune system, or you have the lymphocytic cells for what turns into T cells that enter the thymus and are educated in the thymus to grow up into newborn T cells and they’re released into the bloodstream.

The thymus has two jobs. It manufactures these lovely T cells without which you die but it also has a secondary finishing school. In the thymus cortex you manufacture all these lovely T cells but in the thymus medulla the T cells go to the medulla and if they don’t pass the second examination that they have to pass before they release into the body they’re all killed off. That second examination is: Do you reject self? As we get older, the thymus weakens in both the functions of making the T cells and screening out the ones that attack self. It stands to reason as we get older and the thymus’ influence wanes, we’re going to get more autoimmune disorders.

It took people a while to catch on to the fact that this involution problem is really a significant issue because the T cells that you made when you were 12, and even 20 and 40, they’re probably lasting until you’re 60. But at some point they don’t get replaced as fast as they’re going out of existence, and then your immune system goes off the cliff. Between the ages of 62 and 78 you lose 98% of your ability to recognize foreign antigens, and you still have a lot of capacity left.

We had nine guys in the first trial. Second trial we had 18 men 6 women and 2 controls that happen to be contemporaneous with that group. We have some more controls now that are either finished or or nearing completion. The second population was older than the first population by about nine years, but based on the epigenetic clocks that we looked at, they were starting off biologically younger.

On this last data analysis for Triim XA we looked at 21 different aging clocks. One aspect of the noise that we’re talking about is that biological aging as measured by some of these clocks is circadian. If you measure your age at 4:00 a.m. versus 11:00 a.m. you’re going to get a different result. It’s dynamic and there’s a trend and over time you change in a certain direction, but over any short period of time you can bounce around a little bit. The clocks predict your probability of cognitive dysfunction, they predict your probability of having impairments in your daily life, and they also predict your mortality.

We’re pretty much wrapping up that second clinical trial and going into the third. As we look at more data we understand more and more things and we see more and more things that we previously were not aware of. We began to look at a phenomena that may be responsible for limiting the magnitude of responses that we’re seeing limiting the aging reversal.

Triim-XD which is the next flavor of Triim-X is going to be looking at shifting biochemical pathways in such a way that it optimizes effects of these three medications that we’re giving people [human growth hormone, DHEA, and metformin] and prevents contradictions between them and prevents side effects of each one of these things. That’s about all I can tell you right now.”

Charts regarding the discussed item of how long effects may last are covered in The next phase of reversing aging and immunosenescent trends which was the last time I curated this research effort.

Practice what you preach, or shut up

gettingwell4 0-1 star Wasted resources, Acetylcholine, Amygdala, Anterior cingulate cortex, Beliefs, Brain development, Brain hemispheres, Brainstem, Cerebellum, Cerebrum, Cortisol, Dopamine, Epigenetics, Glutamate, Hippocampus, Hypothalamus, Immune system, Limbic system, Locus coeruleus, Lower brain, Memory, Neurochemicals, Serotonin, Stress, Thalamus , , , , , ,

A 2025 review subject was sulforaphane and brain health. This paper was the latest in a sequence where the retired lead author self-aggrandized his career by citing previous research.

He apparently doesn’t personally do what these research findings suggest people do. The lead author is a few weeks older than I am, and has completely white hair per an interview (Week 34 comments). I’ve had dark hair growing in (last week a barber said my dark hair was 90%) since Week 8 of eating broccoli sprouts every day, which is a side effect of ameliorating system-wide inflammation and oxidative stress.

If the lead author followed up with what his research investigated, he’d have dark hair, too. Unpigmented white hair and colored hair are both results of epigenetics.

Contrast this lack of personal follow-through of research findings with Dr. Goodenowe’s protocol where he compared extremely detailed personal brain measurements at 17 months and again at 31 months. He believes enough in his research findings to personally act on them, and demonstrate to others how personal agency can enhance a person’s life.

It’s every human’s choice whether or not we take responsibility for our own one precious life. I’ve read and curated on this blog many of this paper’s references. Five years ago for example:

So do more with their information than just read.

https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/17/8/1353 “Sulforaphane and Brain Health: From Pathways of Action to Effects on Specific Disorders”

Vitamin K2 and your brain

gettingwell4 5+ stars Premium, Cerebrum, Epigenetics, Immune system, Memory, Stress , , ,

A 2025 review linked Vitamin K2‘s effects on vascular health with cognitive function:

“Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is negatively correlated with cognitive health. Arterial stiffness, in particular, appears to be a critical factor in the functional and structural brain changes associated with aging. We review the association between vitamin K and cerebral function, discussing novel developments regarding its therapeutic role in arterial stiffness and cognitive health.

Among the non-invasive measures of vascular stiffness, pulse wave velocity (PWV) is considered the gold standard. PWV measures arterial stiffness along the entire aortic pathway, providing a reliable, feasible, and accurate assessment of vascular health. Arterial stiffness, as measured by PWV, is negatively associated with total brain volume, brain atrophy, and cognitive function. Pathogenic mechanisms responsible for vascular stiffness recently shifted from collagen and elastin to the differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells to osteoblastic phenotype, which is triggered by oxidative stress and inflammation, membrane mechanotransduction, lipid metabolism, genetic factors, and epigenetics.

Vitamin K-dependent proteins (VKDPs) rely on vitamin K to undergo γ-glutamylcarboxylation, a modification essential for their biological activity. This family of proteins includes hepatic VKDPs such as prothrombin, FVII, FIX, and FX, protein S and protein C as well as extrahepatic VKDPs such as matrix Gla-protein (MGP), which is involved in inhibiting vascular calcification, and osteocalcin, which plays a role in bone mineralization.

Structural differences between K1 and K2 influence their bioavailability, absorption, bioactivity, and distribution within tissues. Compared to vitamin K1, the K2 subtype menaquinone-7 (MK-7) has a significantly longer half-life, accumulates more effectively in blood, and exhibits greater biological activity, particularly in facilitating the carboxylation of extrahepatic VKDPs. Circulating dephosphorylated, uncarboxylated Matrix Gla protein (dp-ucMGP), a marker of extrahepatic vitamin K deficiency, could represent a novel therapeutic target for mitigating both arterial stiffness and cognitive decline.

Vascular calcification and arterial stiffness may represent pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the onset and progression of cognitive decline. Vitamin K deficiency is a key determinant of arterial health and, by extension, may influence cognitive function in the elderly.

To elucidate potential therapeutic benefits of MK-7 supplementation on cognitive function, future randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed. These trials should focus on using optimal dosages (>500 μg/day), ensuring long follow-up periods, and utilizing the most bioactive form of vitamin K (MK-7).”

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/aging-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2024.1527535/full “The role of vitamin K2 in cognitive impairment: linking vascular health to brain health”

A coauthor Dr. Katarzyna Maresz took time on her weekend to answer a few questions:

1. Regarding the second paper of Part 2 of Vitamin K2 – What can it do?:

Hello Dr. Maresz. Did this trial ever happen? “Effects of Combined Vitamin K2 and Vitamin D3 Supplementation on Na[18F]F PET/MRI in Patients with Carotid Artery Disease: The INTRICATE Rationale and Trial Design” I haven’t seen a followup mention of it since 2021.

“Hello. The study never started. The capsules were produced for the study, but the research center experienced delays. Unfortunately, I’m afraid it won’t proceed. Regarding studies on aortic stenosis and vitamin K2, BASIC II has been completed, and the data from this pilot study are currently under analysis. (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29561783/). There is also published study with K1: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.027011

2. Thank you! In your recent review of cognitive function and K2 (above), what influenced the heuristic that a >500 mcg K2 dose should be pursued in future RCTs?

“The optimal vitamin K dosage depends on the target population. Research in kidney patients has shown that 460 mcg daily was insufficient, that is why have hypothesis that at least 500 mcg should be used. The ongoing VIKIPEDIA study is using 1,000 mcg daily in peritoneal dialysis patients. In healthy young individuals, 180-360 mcg was effective in improving vitamin K status (British Journal of Nutrition (2012), 108, 1652–1657) . However, a one-year clinical study found that 180 mcg daily was sufficient for women but not for men. Additionally, older adults and individuals with metabolic disorders may require higher doses for optimal benefits. So it is pretty complicated situation. We do not have good marker of extrahepatic K status. dp-ucMGP seems to be valuable from CV perspective.”

3. Regarding Fat-soluble vitamin competition:

Thank you again Dr. Maresz! Would any consideration be given to dosing K2 separately from dosing another fat-soluble vitamin? A 2015 in vitro study found that vitamins D, A, and E outcompeted K1 intake when simultaneously dosed. I inferred from the one capsule of D3-K2 produced for the canceled trial that isn’t that much of a problem with K2?

“You are right, the key findings suggest that vitamin D, E, and K share common absorption pathways, leading to competitive interactions during uptake. However, I’m afraid we do not have human data. The majority of studies have focused on vitamin K2 alone. Recent research combining K2 and D3 showed an improvement in vitamin K status. Example: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35465686/ or increase in D level: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39861434/. We do not know if VKDP activation or absorption of D would be more effective if K2 were not supplemented with D3 at the same time. Unfortunately, I doubt anyone will fund such a study, as clinical trials are very expensive. In vitro data will always raise questions regarding their relevance to human physiology. In my opinion, for patients to fully benefit from optimal vitamin K status, vitamin D levels should also be optimized, as both have synergistic effects.”

Coffee compound effects

gettingwell4 4-5 stars Advanced knowledge, Epigenetics, Immune system, Neurochemicals, Serotonin, Stress, Telomeres , ,

Three papers continue Polyphenol Nrf2 activators themes starting with a 2025 review of chlorogenic acid:

“Chlorogenic acid may comprise between 70 and 350 mg per cup of coffee. Chlorogenic acid can reduce reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels via the upregulation of antioxidant enzymes, decreasing oxidative stress/damage due to the action of adaptive hormetic mechanisms. There is also a substantial literature of hormetic dose responses for metabolites of chlorogenic acid, such as caffeic acid and ferulic acid.

Chlorogenic acid-induced hormetic biphasic dose responses in a spectrum of experimental designs:

  1. Responses to direct exposures in a range of cell types;
  2. Preconditioning experiments in which a prior dose of chlorogenic acid protected against a subsequent stressor agent;
  3. Studies that included direct exposure, showing hormesis dose responses and then selecting the optimal hormetic dosage as a preconditioning treatment to protect against a subsequent exposure to a toxic agent; and
  4. A mixed group of experiments in which preconditioning was conducted, including several neuronal cellular models, all showing protection against the subsequent exposure to the toxic agent.

However, in the context of translating experimental data to clinical relevance, the concentrations employed in the majority of the in vitro studies with chlorogenic acid far exceeded transitory peak levels, even in heavy coffee drinkers (i.e., approximately 3 μM). In addition to the use of unrealistically high chlorogenic acid concentrations, exposures were prolonged, ranging from 1 to 3 days. These studies are of limited relevance to humans, a similar concern raised by other researchers involved with polyphenol research.


The present paper has framed the hypothesis that key coffee constituents, such as chlorogenic acid, show hormetic effects in a range of cell types and endpoints. Chlorogenic acid may affect some of the health benefits of coffee drinking via its role in GI tract health and beneficial brain-gut interaction.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0009279724004897 “Do the hormetic effects of chlorogenic acid mediate some of the beneficial effects of coffee?” (not freely available) Thanks to Dr. Evgenios Agathokleous for providing copies of this and the following paper.

A 2024 review by the same research group was on hormetic effects of caffeic acid:

“Caffeic acid is a polyphenol present in numerous fruits and vegetables, especially in coffee. Diets contain about 5–10 to 50 milligrams per day of caffeic acid while coffee ingestion provides about another 250–600 milligrams per day. For the moderate to heavy coffee drinker this would result in an ingestion of about 600–1000 milligrams of caffeic acid from food and coffee consumption.

The present paper evaluates whether caffeic acid may act as an hormetic agent, mediating its chemoprotective effects as has been shown for related agents, such as rosmarinic acid, ferulic acid, and chlorogenic acid. Caffeic acid protective effects were mediated via the upregulation of a series of antioxidant enzymes related to activation of Nrf2.

Caffeic acid enhanced the lifespan of C. elegans along with similar observations for rosmarinic acid that can be hydrolyzed to caffeic acid. Several hundred plant-based agents can enhance lifespan in experimental models such as C. elegans, and there is a competition to find the most effective agents with potential commercial applications.

Hormetic effects typically show a 30 to 60% stimulation above control. This is far below the 2 to 3-fold greater than control detection limit for statistical significance based on human variability/bioplasticity and are often reported as false negatives.

A weight-of-evidence approach was proposed based on multiple in vivo and in vitro test results to derive a study design strategy to increase detection of hormetic effects within the clinical trial framework. Such research should explore hormetic based interactions linking protective catabolic-based adaptive responses with activation and regulation of anabolic mediated hormetic growth effects.”

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19390211.2024.2410776 “Caffeic Acid: Numerous Chemoprotective Effects are Mediated via Hormesis” (not freely available)

A 2024 review provided an overall picture of coffee compounds’ cardiometabolic effects:

“This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of longitudinal observational and interventional studies on the cardiometabolic effects of coffee consumption.

  • Findings indicate that while coffee may cause short-term increases in blood pressure, it does not contribute to long-term hypertension risk.
  • There is limited evidence indicating that coffee intake might reduce the risk of metabolic syndrome and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
  • Coffee consumption is consistently linked with reduced risks of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), showing dose-response relationships.
  • The relationship between coffee and cardiovascular disease is complex, showing potential stroke prevention benefits but ambiguous effects on coronary heart disease.
  • Moderate coffee consumption, typically ranging from 1 to 5 cups per day, is linked to a reduced risk of heart failure, while its impact on atrial fibrillation remains inconclusive. Coffee consumption is associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality, following a U-shaped pattern, with the largest risk reduction observed at moderate consumption levels.
  • Except for T2D and CKD, Mendelian randomization studies do not robustly support a causal link between coffee consumption and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes.

Potential beneficial effects of coffee on cardiometabolic health are consistent across age, sex, geographical regions, and coffee subtypes and are multi-dimensional, involving antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, lipid-modulating, insulin-sensitizing, and thermogenic effects. Based on its beneficial effects on cardiometabolic health and fundamental biological processes involved in aging, moderate coffee consumption has the potential to contribute to extending healthspan and increasing longevity.”

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11493900 “Coffee consumption and cardiometabolic health: a comprehensive review of the evidence”

A sulforaphane review

gettingwell4 0-1 star Wasted resources, Beliefs, Brain development, Epigenetics, Immune system , , ,

Here’s a 2025 review where the lead author is a retired researcher whose words readers might interpret as Science. As a reminder, unlike study researchers, reviewers are free to:

  • Express their beliefs as facts;
  • Over/under emphasize study limitations; and
  • Disregard and misrepresent evidence as they see fit.

Reviewers also aren’t obligated to make post-publication corrections for their errors and distortions. For examples:

1. After the 7. Conclusions section, there’s an 8. Afterword: I3C and DIM section. The phrase “As detailed in our earliest work on broccoli sprouts..” indicated a belief carried over from last century of the low importance of those research subjects.

Then, contrary to uncited clinical trials such as Our model clinical trial for Changing to a youthful phenotype with broccoli sprouts and Eat broccoli sprouts for DIM, “Broccoli sprouts had next to no indole glucosinolates.” And in the middle of downplaying I3C and DIM research, they stated: “There are 149 clinical studies on DIM and 11 on I3C listed on clinicaltrials.gov, suggesting a good safety profile. Potential efficacy and mode of action in humans are a subject of intense current investigation, though definitive answers will not come for some time.” 🧐

2. In the 3. Sulforaphane section, they asserted: “Glucosinolates such as glucoraphanin are ‘activated’ or converted to isothiocyanates such as sulforaphane by an enzyme called myrosinase, which is present in that same plant tissue (e.g., seed, sprout, broccoli head, or microgreen) and/or in bacteria that all humans possess in their gastrointestinal tracts.” and cited a 2016 book they coauthored that I can’t access.

The first 2021 paper of Broccoli sprout compounds and gut microbiota didn’t assert that “all humans” had certain gut microbiota that converted glucosinolates to isothiocyanates. That paper instead stated: “Human feeding trials have shown inter-individual variations in gut microbiome composition coincides with variations in ITC absorption and excretion, and some bacteria produce ITCs from glucosinolates.”

3. Nearly half of their cited references were in vitro cancer papers. I rarely curate those types of studies because of their undisclosed human-irrelevant factors. For example, from the second paper of Polyphenol Nrf2 activators:

Bioavailability studies reveal that maximum concentrations in plasma typically do not exceed 1 µM following consumption of 10–100 mg of a single phenolic compound, with the maximum concentration occurring typically less than 2 h after ingestion, then dropping quickly thereafter. In the case of the in vitro studies assessed herein, and with few exceptions, most of the studies employed concentrations >10 µM with some studies involving concentrations in the several hundred µM range, with the duration of exposure typically in the range of 24–72 h, far longer duration than the very short time interval of a few minutes to several hours in human in vivo situations.

applsci-15-00522-g001-550

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/2/522 “The Impact of Sulforaphane on Sex-Specific Conditions and Hormone Balance: A Comprehensive Review”

Too dangerous to investigate?

gettingwell4 0-1 star Wasted resources, Hippocampus, Immune system, Limbic system, Memory , ,

This blog’s 1100th curation is a clinical trial of ergothioneine’s effects on cognitive decline:

“We recruited participants aged between 60–90 years of age, from three study cohorts diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and provided them with ergothioneine (ET)  (25 mg capsules administered orally three times a week) or placebo in a double-blinded and randomized manner. Blood samples were collected at baseline and quarterly (visits 1, 4, 7, 10, 14) for clinical safety assessment and biomarker analyses). Neuro-cognitive assessments were conducted biannually (visits 7 and 14).

Following ET intake, an increase in Z-scores was observed in the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) (immediate and delayed recalls), which evaluates learning ability and memory.

ravlt

wbc

Participants in both ET and placebo groups recorded a lower total white blood cell count compared to baseline at visit 7, both of which recovered subsequently. The reasons for this anomaly are unclear but values were all still within the expected range for their age.”

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10.1177/13872877241291253 “Investigating the efficacy of ergothioneine to delay cognitive decline in mild cognitively impaired subjects: A pilot study”

I rated this study a waste of time and money for the researchers’ incurious lack of following where their data led. Significant WBC signals of both treatment and placebo subjects’ immune system responses were shrugged off with an “expected range” non-explanation.

What can’t white tea do?

gettingwell4 Just me , , ,

An effusive 2024 review of white tea’s beneficial effects:

“This comprehensive examination contributes nuanced perspectives, paving the way for continued research, innovation, and integration of white tea into diverse consumer preferences. Overall, white tea emerges as a multifaceted beverage with far-reaching implications for health, wellness, and the future landscape of the tea industry.”

white tea

https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.26599/FSHW.2024.9250424 “New insights into chemical compositions and health benefits of white tea and development of new products derived from white tea” (click pdf link)

I didn’t see a mention of white tea drinkers’ ability to levitate and fly the astral plane like the Red Bull commercials. Maybe it’s just obvious?

Polyphenol Nrf2 activators

gettingwell4 2-3 stars Required further work, Acetylcholine, Amygdala, Cerebrum, Cortisol, Dopamine, Epigenetics, Glutamate, Hippocampus, Hypothalamus, Immune system, Limbic system, Memory, Neurochemicals, Oxytocin, Serotonin, Stress, Vasopressin , , , , ,

Two 2024 reviews by the same group that published Sulforaphane in the Goldilocks zone investigated dietary polyphenols’ effects as “hormetic nutrients”:

“Polyphenols display biphasic dose–response effects by activating at a low dose the Nrf2 pathway resulting in the upregulation of antioxidant vitagenes [see diagram]. We aimed to discuss hormetic nutrients, including polyphenols and/or probiotics, targeting the Nrf2 pathway and vitagenes for the development of promising neuroprotective and therapeutic strategies to suppress oxidative stress, inflammation and microbiota deregulation, and consequently improve cognitive performance and brain health.

antioxidants-13-00484-g001

Hormetic nutrition through polyphenols and/or probiotics targeting the antioxidant Nrf2 pathway and stress resilient vitagenes to inhibit oxidative stress and inflammatory pathways, as well as ferroptosis, could represent an effective therapy to manipulate alterations in the gut microbiome leading to brain dysfunction in order to prevent or slow the onset of major cognitive disorders. Notably, hormetic nutrients can stimulate the vagus nerve as a means of directly modulating microbiota-brain interactions for therapeutic purposes to mitigate or reverse the pathophysiological process, restoring gut and brain homeostasis, as reported by extensive preclinical and clinical studies.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/13/4/484 “Hormetic Nutrition and Redox Regulation in Gut–Brain Axis Disorders”

I’m not onboard with this study’s probiotic assertions because most of the cited studies contained unacknowledged measurement errors. Measuring gut microbiota, Part 2 found:

“The fecal microbiome does not represent the overall composition of the gut microbiome. Despite significant roles of gut microbiome in various phenotypes and diseases of its host, causative microbes for such characteristics identified by one research fail to be reproduced in others.

Since fecal microbiome is a result of the gut microbiome rather than the representative microbiome of the GI tract of the host, there is a limitation in identifying causative intestinal microbes related to these phenotypes and diseases by studying fecal microbiome.”

These researchers also erroneously equated isothiocyanate sulforaphane’s Nrf2-activating mechanisms with polyphenols activating Nrf2.

This research group did better in clarifying polyphenols’ mechanisms in a review of hormetic dose-response effects of the polyphenol rosmarinic acid:

“This article evaluates whether rosmarinic acid may act as a hormetic agent, mediating its chemoprotective effects as has been shown for similar agents, such as caffeic acid, a derivative of rosmarinic acid.

Rosmarinic acid enhanced memory in institute of cancer research male mice in the Morris water maze (escape latency).

untitled

Of importance in the evaluation of rosmarinic acid are its bioavailability, metabolism, and tissue distribution (including the capacity to affect and/or cross the BBB and its distribution and half-life within the brain). In the case of polyphenols, including rosmarinic acid, they are typically delivered at low doses in the diet and, in most instances, they do not escape first-pass metabolism, with the prominent chemical forms being conjugates of glucuronides and sulfates, with or without methylation.

These conjugated metabolites are chemically distinct from the parent compound, showing considerable differences in size, polarity, and ionic form. Their biological actions are quite different from the parent compound.

Bioavailability studies reveal that maximum concentrations in plasma typically do not exceed 1 µM following consumption of 10–100 mg of a single phenolic compound, with the maximum concentration occurring typically less than 2 h after ingestion, then dropping quickly thereafter. In the case of the in vitro studies assessed herein, and with few exceptions, most of the studies employed concentrations >10 µM with some studies involving concentrations in the several hundred µM range, with the duration of exposure typically in the range of 24–72 h, far longer duration than the very short time interval of a few minutes to several hours in human in vivo situations.

We strongly recommend that all experiments using in vitro models to study biological responses to dietary polyphenols use only physiologically relevant flavonoids and their conjugates at appropriate concentrations, provide evidence to support their use, and justify any conclusions generated. When authors fail to do this, referees and editors must act to ensure that data obtained in vitro are relevant to what might occur in vivo.”

https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/med-2024-1065/html “The chemoprotective hormetic effects of rosmarinic acid”

An elevator pitch for plasmalogen precursors

gettingwell4 4-5 stars Advanced knowledge, Acetylcholine, Dopamine, Epigenetics, Glutamate, Hippocampus, Immune system, Limbic system, Lower brain, Memory, Neurochemicals, Serotonin, Stress, Thalamus , , ,

An excerpt from the latest video at Dr. Goodenowe’s Health Matters podcast, Episode 7 “The Truth about Parkinson’s”, starting at 50:30:

“What’s exciting about this community medicine focus that we’ve switched to which basically says: How do we develop technologies in a way that they can be incorporated into a community model versus a pharmaceutical drug model? People can actually do I would say self-experiment just the way you self-experiment with your own diet because these are fundamentally dietary nutrition molecules.

Could you give me an elevator pitch because there are probably people listening who are thinking what is this plasmalogen precursor and for sure how is it having this dramatic effect?

Plasmalogens are the most important nutrient that nobody knows about. Normally you don’t know about it because the body is usually pretty good at making them. What makes plasmalogens unique is that your body makes them kind of like cannon fodder, the first group of people that go into war. Your body throws them out for destruction. They absorb oxidative stress and get destroyed in the process.

They’re stored in your cell membranes. 50% of the membranes of your heart are these plasmalogen molecules. When your heart gets inflamed, what your heart does is it dumps these plasmalogens out of its membranes to douse the flame of inflammation. After inflammation is under control, your body naturally builds these things back up again.

But if you have an inability to make enough plasmalogens, these inflammation events knock you down and keep you down. So plasmalogen precursors are critical for maintaining high levels of plasmalogens across your body, not just in your brain (30% of the lipids in your brain) but in your heart, your lungs, your kidneys.”

PXL_20241117_185248742~2

Brain restoration with plasmalogens, Part 2

gettingwell4 5+ stars Premium, Acetylcholine, Amygdala, Brain development, Brainstem, Cerebellum, Cerebrum, Dopamine, Hippocampus, Hypothalamus, Limbic system, Locus coeruleus, Lower brain, Memory, Neurochemicals, Stress , , , ,

This September 2024 presentation adds data points and concepts to Part 1:

supplementation

  1. “Your brain is dynamically connected to and adaptively responsive to its environment.
  2. You are in control of this environment (nutrition, stimulation, adversity).
  3. Need to measure the environment (lab testing, physiology) and adaptive response to the environment (MRI) to optimize your environment (nutrition, lifestyle) to achieve optimal brain structure, function, health, and longevity.

neurovascular

From a global cortical volume and thickness perspective, 17 months of high dose plasmalogens reversed about 15 years of predicted brain deterioration. 31 months reversed almost 20 years. So you can get more out of life.”

https://drgoodenowe.com/immortal-neurology-building-maintaining-an-immortal-brain/

Dr. Goodenowe also added case studies of two patients:

1. A 50-year-old woman with MS who had been legally blind in one eye for 32 years who regained sight in that eye after eight months of supplementation.

“This is the adaptability of the human brain. Her eye is not actually impaired. What’s impaired is the ability, the adaptability of the brain to the signal of light, to actually start interpreting what that light signal is.”

2. A 61-year-old man with dementia from firefighting work for the U.S. Navy in a toxic environment with head injuries after nine months of supplementation.

“The brain can heal itself is the point of the story. His executive function skills in everyday life are getting better.”

Activate Nrf2 to reduce biological age

gettingwell4 4-5 stars Advanced knowledge, Anterior cingulate cortex, Brainstem, Cerebellum, Cerebrum, Epigenetics, Glutamate, Hippocampus, Immune system, Limbic system, Lower brain, Memory, Neurochemicals, Stress , , , ,

A 2024 primate study investigated effects of an off-patent drug on age-related changes:

“We evaluated geroprotective effects of metformin on adult male cynomolgus monkeys. The study encompassed a comprehensive suite of physiological, imaging, histological, and molecular evaluations, substantiating metformin’s influence on delaying age-related phenotypes at the organismal level.

monkey nrf2

Results highlighted a significant slowing of aging indicators, notably a roughly 6-year regression in brain aging. Metformin exerts a substantial neuroprotective effect, preserving brain structure and enhancing cognitive ability.

Geroprotective effects on primate neurons were partially mediated by activation of Nrf2, a transcription factor with anti-oxidative capabilities.”

https://www.cell.com/cell/abstract/S0092-8674(24)00914-0 “Metformin decelerates aging clock in male monkeys” (not freely available). Thanks to Dr. Pradeep Reddy for providing a copy.

From this study’s Nrf2 activation findings:

“Metformin treatment resulted in increased nuclear phosphorylated Nrf2, accompanied by up-regulation of Nrf2 target genes like HO-1, NQO-1, SOD3, GPX2, and GPX1, which were generally suppressed and typically down-regulated during human neuron senescence.

Genes pivotal for neuronal function, such as dendrite morphogenesis/extension and synapse assembly (e.g., GSK3B, GRID2, and NRG3), were down-regulated during aging in excitatory neurons (ExN), inhibitory neurons (InN), oligodendrocytes (OL), oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPC), microglia, and astrocyte but were restored by metformin treatment. By contrast, pathways that were up-regulated during aging, including activation of the immune response, complement activation, and regulation of the TGF-b receptor signaling pathway, were reset to lower levels by metformin treatment.

metformin neuronal gene pathways

We verified that markers associated with brain aging and progression of neurodegenerative diseases were restored by metformin treatment to levels similar to those observed in young monkeys. Additionally, we observed that reduced myelin sheath thickness, a characteristic of aged monkeys, was rebuilt to a younger state following metformin treatment.

These findings align with the levels of nuclear-localized phosphorylated Nrf2, suggesting that Nrf2 pathway activation is a key mechanism in metformin’s role in delaying human neuronal aging and, by extension, brain aging. Consistent with our in vitro findings, Nrf2 pathway activation was also detected across multiple tissues in metformin-treated monkeys, including frontal lobe neurons.

At last count, I’ve curated 250+ papers this decade on cruciferous vegetables, and many of these explored relationships with Nrf2 activation. Basically, eating a clinically-relevant daily dose of 3-day-old cruciferous sprouts and taking off-patent metformin both induce Nrf2 activation effects.

Don’t expect to see many researchers highlighting this equivalency. They’d rather wait another decade to nitpick other studies with not-enough-subjects / not-exactly replicated / other nitpicks before expressing opinions urging caution from their nursing home beds.

But even then, they won’t get their facts straight. For example, a contemporaneous opinion article https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-02938-w “The brain aged more slowly in monkeys given a cheap diabetes drug” attempted to summarize this study, and flubbed two points:

1. The study said: “We conducted a proof-of-concept study involving male cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) aged between 13 and 16 years, roughly equivalent to approximately 40–50 years in humans. Monkeys adhered to this regimen for a period of 1,200 days, approximately 3.3 years, which corresponds to about 10 years in humans.”

The opinion claimed: “Animals took the drug for 40 months, which is equivalent to about 13 years for humans.”

2. The opinion quoted a New York City researcher involved in a separate metformin study and employed at a medical school for:

“Research into metformin and other anti-ageing candidates could one day mean that doctors will be able to focus more on keeping people healthy for as long as possible rather than on treating diseases.”

This statement is a big break from the realities of medical personnel daily actions at least so far this decade, which is when I started to pay close attention:

  • Doctors have very little diet and exercise training in medical school. There’s no way they can give health advice. There’s no way that a “keeping people healthy” paradigm will emerge from the current medical system.
  • Fixing a disease doesn’t restore a patient’s health. Dr. (PhD) Goodenowe cites several examples in his talks, such as a study that compared colorectal cancer therapy with post-operation patient health.
  • If you listen to yesterday’s two-hour-long podcast, the currently injured person in the first hour gave plenty of contrary evidence of doctors’ focuses: behaviors of trying to blame and gaslight the patient, thinly-disguised punitive actions, CYA etc., all of which they will be sued for one day. The doctor in the second hour provided an example of the quoted researcher in her explanation of how doctors higher in the hierarchy either can’t see or can’t admit realities of doctor/patient interactions, and what therapies have actually benefited or harmed a patient.

How to choose your medical professional

gettingwell4 4-5 stars Advanced knowledge, Beliefs, Epigenetics, Immune system, Primal Therapy, Stress , , ,

Two+ decades ago (before smart phones) I wrote a series of short books entitled How To Choose Your  Lawyer, ..Accountant, ..Financial Advisor. My customers were mainly public libraries.

This is a short post on choosing doctors, although I’ve fired all my doctors and don’t have one. Everything that’s happened this decade has made me wonder why I trusted doctors in the first place.

1. It takes certain behavioral quirks for doctors to assert they know better than you do about what is good for you. These behaviors usually have nothing to do with these doctors’ patients, but patients somehow believe doctors.

These behaviors are almost always doctors’ act-outs of early-life traumas of unfulfilled needs. Pain keeps people from feeling their actual histories, though, so we don’t deal with our real histories therapeutically until we absolutely have to.

If your doctor listens to you at all, it’s only because they are constantly vigilant for some way to fulfill their own unsatisfied needs. But that neither resolves anything for them, as an early need can’t be satisfied years later, nor has anything to do with what you need from a medical professional.

2. If you’ve read extensively about an area and have questions, a doctor may know less than you. That won’t keep them from gaslighting you due to 1. above, but it does keep you from getting what you need from them. Discussing facts you know with a medical professional who is intentionally ignorant about a medical subject gets you nowhere.

3. If your doctor has not publicly disclaimed their advocacy of this decade’s misguided genetic therapy, they are compromised and can’t be trusted. It doesn’t matter what else they said, because they weren’t honest about what they knew or should have known, as revealed by their actions or inactions.

For example, two studies published in June 2024 established that:

  • Neurologic issues (68% increase in depression, and a 44% increase in anxiety / dissociative / stress-related / somatoform disorders) followed COVID gene therapy: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-024-02627-0 “Psychiatric adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination: a population-based cohort study in Seoul, South Korea” (2,027,353 people)
  • COVID gene therapy increased the risk of mild cognitive impairment 138% and the risk of Alzheimer’s by 23%: https://academic.oup.com/qjmed/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/qjmed/hcae103/7684274 “A potential association between COVID-19 vaccination and development of Alzheimer’s disease” (558,017 people). These graphics showed rapidly increasing MCI and AD incidences. The study’s analysis showed incidence increases could not have happened by chance.

ea3f75cb-a071-4cc9-9bd8-0609d0ad8961_1466x890

A doctor’s only honest response to this malfeasance is to publicly apologize, and tell their trusting patients they will make it up to them by providing free healthcare to help mitigate results of their unprofessional conduct. If they tell you something else, it’s a distraction from consequences that are beyond words.