Immune system

Combining exercise with sulforaphane

gettingwell4 5+ stars Premium, Epigenetics, Glutamate, Immune system, Neurochemicals, Stress ,

A 2025 clinical trial with old people compared NRF2 effects of acute exercise with pre- and post-exercise sulforaphane treatment:

“This study tested the hypothesis that combining acute exercise (in vivo stimulus) with ex vivo sulforaphane (SFN) treatment would induce greater NRF2 activation and signaling in older adults compared to either treatment alone. This approach was used to bypass the potential issue of inter-individual variability in metabolism and bioavailability of SFN supplementation through oral consumption and thereby provide more rigorous biological control to establish mechanistic feasibility.

Twenty-five older adults (12 men, 13 women; mean age: 67 ± 5 years) performed 30-min cycling exercise. Blood was drawn before and immediately after exercise to isolate peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and incubate with and without SFN (5 μM) treatment.

Acute exercise induced modest transcriptional changes across the four tested transcripts compared to the robust upregulation elicited by SFN. This disparity was notable given the comparable NRF2/ARE binding activity observed between EX and SFN.

Near-significant trends were observed for EX in heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), and glutathione reductase (GR) (after Bonferroni correction), while glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit (GCLC) was not induced by EX. In contrast, SFN alone robustly induced expression of NQO1, HO-1, GR, and GCLC.

We had chosen 5 μM as the dose based on pilot data from our laboratory and existing literature from in vitro experiments. However, typically, SFN is not combined with another stimulus.

To test this speculation, we ran a post hoc dose–response experiment where we stimulated PBMCs (n = 5) at six different SFN concentrations ranging from 0 to 20 μM (incubated for 5 h) and analyzed responses across the four genes used in the present study. The dose responses displayed hormetic curves for NQO1, GR, and GCLC, with 5 μM eliciting the peak response, suggesting that the lack of difference between SFN and the combined treatment was due to a ceiling effect of the SFN dose. Interestingly, HO-1 displayed a linear/curvilinear response with the maximal observed response at 20 μM.

In future ex vivo studies, a sulforaphane concentration of 1–2 μM in combination with acute exercise is predicted to enhance the expression of these antioxidant genes in the PBMCs of older adults to a greater extent than either treatment alone. Furthermore, lower SFN plasma concentrations are more likely to be achievable with oral supplementation.

To our knowledge, this is the first trial to measure responses to acute exercise combined with sulforaphane stimulation on NRF2 signaling in older men and women. We did not observe any statistically significant differences in any of our outcome variables between men and women.

Our results demonstrate that combining acute exercise with a sulforaphane stimulus elicits a greater response in nuclear NRF2 activity in older adults. While the response in gene expression did not completely mirror the response in NRF2 activation, it is important to note that NRF2 induces hundreds of cytoprotective genes. The four transcripts we measured are among those most commonly used to represent NRF2 signaling but do not capture the full picture. Full transcriptomics in future studies would address this question.”

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11357-025-01939-5 “Sulforaphane improves exercise-induced NRF2 signaling in older adults: an in vivo-ex vivo approach” (not freely available) Thanks to Dr. Tinna Traustadóttir for providing a copy.

I asked two questions, and will follow up with replies:

  1. Did a second experiment test effects of these subjects eating broccoli sprouts prior to acute exercise? The clinical trial’s NCT04848792 Study Overview section indicated that was the researchers’ intent.
  2. What studies have the data that produced this study’s graphical abstract’s younger vs. older NRF2 response graph?

Activating Nrf2 pathways with sunlight

gettingwell4 2-3 stars Required further work, Epigenetics, Immune system, Stress , ,

A 2025 review subject was non-electrophilic Nrf2 activators:

“NRF2 can be induced via:

  1. Non-specific electrophile/ROS generation,
  2. Disruption of the NRF2–KEAP1 protein–protein interaction,
  3. Autophagy-mediated KEAP1 degradation,
  4. Direct modulation of NRF2 protein stability, and
  5. Post-transcriptional/post-translational modifications.

Except for a single intervention, therapeutic hypothermia, every non-pharmacological strategy with defined mechanisms employs more than one of these routes, most frequently pairing post-translational modification with either protein-stability regulation or limited electrophile production. This combinatorial activation elevates both NRF2 abundance and transcriptional competence while minimizing the liabilities of purely electrophilic agents and circumventing the efficacy limitations.

Classical electrophilic NRF2 activators, despite potent activation potential, exhibit paradoxically reduced therapeutic efficacy relative to single antioxidants, attributable to concurrent oxidative stress generation, glutathione depletion, mitochondrial impairment, and systemic toxicity. Although emerging non-electrophilic pharmacological activators offer therapeutic potential, their utility remains limited by bioavailability and suboptimal potency.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/14/9/1047 “Non-Electrophilic Activation of NRF2 in Neurological Disorders: Therapeutic Promise of Non-Pharmacological Strategies”

These researchers exaggerated problems of electrophilic Nrf2 activators such as “mitochondrial impairment, and systemic toxicity” so they could have something to write about. Just like every intervention, the dose determines the response. I can’t imagine not eating broccoli sprouts in favor of brain zapping with electroconvulsive therapy or transcranial magnetic stimulation just to avoid sulforaphane’s temporary mild oxidative stress that activates Nrf2 for 15-20 minutes.

But there are limitations to how an unwell person can benefit from Nrf2 activation. For example, I haven’t curated many cancer papers because healthy body functioning can’t be assumed.

I walk the beach at sunrise, weather permitting, because it makes me feel good, and I’m always happy afterwards that I made the effort to get outside. That doing so combines two of the above non-electrophilic Nrf2 activators, physical exercise and photobiomodulation, hasn’t been a consideration.

These reviewers didn’t include human studies of sunlight’s effects. Nevermind that hospitals used to have sundecks for patients, and John Ott published relevant human and animal studies over fifty years ago.

Many studies have an undisclosed limitation in that they were performed without controlling for light. For example, knowing that mitochondria are light-activated, I don’t trust those studies’ in vivo, ex vivo, or in vitro results.

None of the 100 most recent 2025 photobiomodulation papers examined natural sunlight. Maybe it wouldn’t sell red light, green light, and blue light lasers and other products to show that people could produce the same effects themselves with sunlight at different times of the day? Would researchers damage their reputations to study a freely-available intervention, one where they don’t “do something”?

Sulforaphane and skin aging

gettingwell4 0-1 star Wasted resources, Epigenetics, Immune system, Stress

A 2025 rodent study investigated sulforaphane effects on natural skin aging:

“Aging is a multifactorial process that progressively impairs skin integrity by diminishing dermal fibroblast function, which is macroscopically manifested by wrinkling, laxity, and pigmentary abnormalities. The potential mechanism by which sulforaphane (SFN) delays intrinsic skin aging was explored through skin proteomic sequencing and immune cell infiltration analysis. Associations between SFN administration and phenotypic changes in skin aging, immune cell populations, and key signaling pathway targets were further examined.

WBC count results indicated that mice from the Aged group were significantly immunosuppressed. T cells occupied the main lymphocyte lineages.

The present study illuminated the skin protective mechanism of SFN by network pharmacology and proteomics analyses in a natural aging mouse model. SFN therapy showed significant alterations in skin structure, redox balance, and composition of immune cell populations after an intervention duration of 2 months.”

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mnfr.70281 “Integrative Network Pharmacology and Proteomics Decipher the Immunomodulatory Mechanism of Sulforaphane Against Intrinsic Skin Aging” (not freely available)

I rated this study Wasted resources for using sulforaphane doses not relevant to humans. I usually don’t curate such studies. Its lowest sulforaphane 50 mg/day dose is a ((50 mg * .081) * 70 kg) = 284 mg human equivalent.

I decided to curate it for its informative young controls vs. aged controls results in the above graphic. WBC counts are available on almost every standard human blood test.

This study’s young and aged groups per Grok: “A 2-month-old mouse aging for two more months (reaching 4 months) is approximately equivalent to a human aging from about 12–15 years to 17–21 years old. An 18-month-old mouse (human equivalent: ~45–50 years) aging for two months would be roughly equivalent to a human aging from ~45–50 years to ~51–58 years.”

Glucosinolate and isothiocyanate human interventions

gettingwell4 2-3 stars Required further work, Epigenetics, Immune system, Stress ,

A 2025 review covered human evidence from glucosinolate and isothiocyanate research through April 2025:

“Glucosinolates (GSLs) and their breakdown products, isothiocyanates (ITCs), are biogenesis compounds with anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticancer properties, mediated through key pathways such as Nrf2, NF‐κB, and epigenetic regulation. However, their limited and variable bioavailability remains a key challenge. This review summarises the current clinical evidence on GSLs and ITCs, with a focus on their health effects and metabolic fate in humans.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/14/16/2876 “Bioavailability, Human Metabolism, and Dietary Interventions of Glucosinolates and Isothiocyanates: Critical Insights and Future Perspectives”

In the above graphic, notice how the inactive myrosinase column has no small intestine participation, but the active myrosinase column does. This point wasn’t adequately emphasized, that for complete effects, an individual has to do whatever they can to thoroughly chew or otherwise activate myrosinase to hydrolyze glucosinolates before swallowing.

Researchers don’t rely on individuals taking responsibility for their own health, of course. Just swallow these pills, we’ll do it for you, as if humans are lab rats. This lack of emphasis is understandable, if not optimal.

This review provided longish coverage of studies, which is preferable to the usual treatment of citing a reference without much explanation. Compare, for example, my longish curation of the 2023 Eat broccoli sprouts for your high intensity interval training with its reference 68 summary below:

“Another study investigated the effects of consuming GSL-rich broccoli sprout (GRS) supplements on oxidative stress and physiological adaptations to intense exercise training. In a randomised, double-blind, crossover design, nine healthy participants consumed either a GRS supplement (75 g of sprouts) or a placebo twice daily over a 7-day high-intensity interval training period. The findings revealed that GRS supplementation significantly reduced markers of oxidative stress, including carbonylated proteins in skeletal muscle and plasma myeloperoxidase levels, compared to the placebo condition. Furthermore, GRS intake led to reduced lactate accumulation during submaximal exercise and enhanced exercise performance, as indicated by a longer time to exhaustion during maximal exercise tests. At the molecular level, supplementation with GRS was associated with elevated Nrf2 protein levels in muscle tissue, suggesting activation of endogenous antioxidant defence mechanisms. In addition, GRS intake mitigated nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes and lowered average blood glucose levels, indicating improved glucose regulation during intense training. Collectively, these results suggest that GRS supplementation may enhance physiological adaptations to high-intensity exercise by reducing oxidative stress and supporting metabolic homeostasis.”

Oats sprouts treat gut inflammation

gettingwell4 4-5 stars Advanced knowledge, Immune system, Stress

A 2025 rodent study investigated differing effects of regular oats and oat sprouts to treat induced colitis:

“This study aims to test our hypothesis that germinated oats exert stronger anti-inflammatory effects than raw oats due to their higher levels of bioactive phytochemicals. First, the nitric oxide (NO) production assay was used to screen [22] commercially available oat seed products and identify the product with the highest anti-inflammatory activity after germination [for five days]. The selected oat seed product was then produced in larger quantities and further evaluated in an in vivo study using the dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis mouse model to compare the anti-inflammatory effects of phytochemical extracts from germinated and raw oats.

The guideline states that for a healthy U.S.-style dietary pattern at a 2000 calorie level, a daily intake of 6 ounces of grains is recommended, with at least 3 ounces (84 g) coming from whole grains (WGs). For a 60 kg human, consuming 3 ounces of WGs per day translates to a 17.2 g/kg daily dose in mice. Given that the daily food intake of a 20 g mouse is approximately 2.5 g, the 17.2 g/kg daily dose corresponds to 14% of the total diet as WGs. Therefore, the 7 and 21% WG equivalent doses used in this study are relevant to human consumption.

Germination led to an overall increase in the content of all avenanthramides (AVAs) and avenacins (AVCs) as well as some avenacosides (AVEs):

  • For AVAs, the compounds 2c, 2p, 2f, 2cd, 2pd, and 2fd significantly increased by 10.0-, 6.3-, 9.6-, 20.7-, 10.6-, and 4.6-fold, respectively, which is consistent with previous reports.
  • This study is the first to report an increase in AVCs after germination, with AVC-A2, B2, A1, and B1 contents significantly increasing by 2.5-, 2.2-, 3.6-, and 4.2-fold, respectively.
  • Although germination resulted in a decrease in certain AVEs, it significantly increased the levels of AVE-C, Iso-AVE-A, AVE-E, and AVE-F by 1.8-, 3.3-, 3.3-, and 5.0-fold, respectively. Notably, AVE-E has been previously reported to have the strongest anti-inflammatory activity among all of the major AVEs.

In summary, germination enhances the anti-inflammatory properties of oats in both cells and DSS-induced colitis in mice by increasing levels of bioactive phytochemicals. Correlation analysis showed a significant inverse relationship between pro-inflammatory cytokines and phytochemical content in feces, especially AVAs and their microbial metabolites.

The observation of a stronger anti-inflammatory effect in the low-dose germinated oat group compared with the high-dose group is intriguing and warrants further investigation. One possible explanation is the phenomenon of hormesis, where low doses of bioactive compounds can exert beneficial effects, while higher doses may lead to diminished efficacy or even adverse effects. Further studies involving a broad range of doses would be valuable to define the effective intake range and provide insight into the underlying mechanisms.

It is possible that AVAs, AVEs, and AVCs act synergistically to enhance the overall anti-inflammatory efficacy, potentially by targeting different inflammatory pathways or modulating each other’s bioavailability and activity. Further investigation into the synergistic interactions among these compounds is warranted.”

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jafc.5c02993 “Phytochemical-Rich Germinated Oats as a Novel Functional Food To Attenuate Gut Inflammation”

I’ve eaten 3-day-old Avena sativa oat sprouts (started from 20 grams of groats) every day for 4.5 years now, and haven’t had gut problems. Here’s what they looked like this morning:

Get a little stress into your life, Part 2

gettingwell4 5+ stars Premium, Cortisol, Epigenetics, Hypothalamus, Immune system, Limbic system, Memory, Neurochemicals, Stress , , , , ,

A 2025 reply to a letter to the editor cited 56 references to elaborate on Part 1 and related topics:

“A positive effect does not necessarily mean benefit, and positive effects on individual organisms may mean adverse effects on other coexisting organisms. However, a vast literature shows that hormetic stimulation can result in benefits depending on the context, for instance, clear growth, yield, and survival improvement.

There is some energetic cost to support hormetic stimulation, with a likely positive energy budget, which might also have negative consequences if there is insufficient energy substrate, especially under concurrent severe environmental challenges. Moreover, hormetic preconditioning could be particularly costly when there is a mismatch between the predicted environment and the actual environment the same individuals or their offspring might face in the future.

Hormesis should not be unilaterally linked to positive and beneficial effects without considering dose levels. For any research to answer the question of whether a stimulation represents hormesis and whether it is beneficial, robust dose–response evaluations are needed, which should be designed a priori for this purpose, meeting the requirements of the proper number, increment, and range of doses.

Both additivity and synergism are possible in the hormetic stimulatory zone, depending also on the duration of exposure and the relative ratio of different components. This might happen, for example, when a chemical primes stress pathways (e.g., heat shock proteins and antioxidants), thus enabling another chemical to trigger hormesis (defense cross-activation) and/or because combined low subtoxicity may modulate receptors (e.g., aryl hydrocarbon receptor and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2) differently than individual exposures (receptor binding synergy).

Moreover, even when stimulation occurs in the presence of individual components, stimulation may no longer be present when combined, and therefore, effects of mixtures cannot be accurately predicted based on the effects of individual components. There may be hormesis trade-offs; hormesis should be judged based on fitness-critical end points.

While often modeled mathematically, hormesis is fundamentally a dynamic biological process and should not be seen as a purely mathematical function, certainly not a linear one. Much remains to be learned about the role of hormesis in global environmental change, and an open mind is needed to not miss the forest for the trees.”

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c05892 “Correspondence on ‘Hormesis as a Hidden Hand in Global Environmental Change?’ A Reply”

Reference 38 was a 2024 paper cited for:

“Hormetic-based interventions, particularly priming (or preconditioning), do not weaken organisms but strengthen them, enhancing their performance and health under different environmental challenges, which are often more massive than the priming exposure.

The catabolic aspect of hormesis is primarily protective whereas the anabolic aspect promotes growth, and their integration could optimize performance and health. The concept of preconditioning has also gained widespread attention in biomedical sciences.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1568163724004069 “The catabolic – anabolic cycling hormesis model of health and resilience” (not freely available)

Reference 40 was a 2021 review that characterized hormesis as a hallmark of health:

“Health is usually defined as the absence of pathology. Here, we endeavor to define health as a compendium of organizational and dynamic features that maintain physiology.

Biological causes or hallmarks of health include features of:

  • Spatial compartmentalization (integrity of barriers and containment of local perturbations),
  • Maintenance of homeostasis over time (recycling and turnover, integration of circuitries, and rhythmic oscillations), and
  • An array of adequate responses to stress (homeostatic resilience, hormetic regulation, and repair and regeneration).

Disruption of any of these interlocked features is broadly pathogenic, causing an acute or progressive derailment of the system.

A future ‘medicine of health’ might detect perilous trajectories to intercept them by targeted interventions well before the traditional ‘medicine of disease’ comes into action.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867420316068 “Hallmarks of Health”

Activate Nrf2 with far-infrared light

gettingwell4 4-5 stars Advanced knowledge, Cerebrum, Epigenetics, Hippocampus, Immune system, Limbic system, Memory, Stress ,

A 2025 rodent study investigated effects of far-infrared light on Alzheimer’s disease models. I’ll focus on its Nrf2 findings:

“Far-infrared radiation (FIR) is commonly utilized as a complementary treatment of a range of disease, for example, insomnia and rheumatoid arthritis. In this research, we explored how FIR light impacts cognitive functions of TgCRND8 AD mice and elucidated its underlying molecular mechanism.

Infrared radiation is a form of electromagnetic energy that has wavelengths between 750 nm and 1000 μm, which are longer than visible light. International Commission on Illumination categorizes infrared light as three sub-divisions according to the wavelength: (1) near-infrared radiation (0.7–1.4 μm), (2) middle infrared radiation (1.4–3.0 μm), and (3) far-infrared radiation (3.0–1000 μm).

Nrf-2/ HO-1 signaling, a key endogenous antioxidant system, helps mitigate oxidative stress and enhances expression of various endogenous genes. Activation of HO-1 during inflammatory conditions may serve as an adaptive response to reduce cytotoxicity through various mechanisms.

In this study, we applied EFFIT LITE® as the FIR spectrum transmitter which stably radiates an FIR spectrum with a wavelength of 4–20 μm, and the device was put within 1 cm directly above the head of the 3-month-old TgCRND8 mice for 30 min exposure once every day. FIR light notably enhanced cognitive function and spatial memory of TgCRND8 mice after 28-days consecutive treatment.

Underlying molecular mechanisms involve suppression of Aβ deposition, hyperphosphorylation of tau, and neuroinflammation through modulating Jak-2/Stat3 and Nrf-2/HO-1 pathways. Our current experimental findings amply indicate that FIR light is a potential non-pharmacological therapy for AD.”

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12017-025-08860-2“Far-Infrared Radiation Ameliorates the Cognitive Dysfunction in an Alzheimer’s Disease Transgenic Mouse via Modulating Jak-2/Stat3 and Nrf-2/HO-1 Pathways”

This study measured Nrf2 and its quickly-induced downstream enzyme HO-1 effects of daily far-infrared light exposure for 30 minutes. We’d have to see measurements of Nrf2’s more-slowly induced and longer-lasting downstream xenobiotic detoxifying enzyme NQO1 to compare far-infrared light Nrf2 activation effects with those of natural plant compounds.

Betaine as an exercise mimetic

gettingwell4 5+ stars Premium, Cortisol, Epigenetics, Immune system, Memory, Neurochemicals, Stress , ,

A 2025 human study investigated effects of long-term exercise:

“Exercise has well-established health benefits, yet its molecular underpinnings remain incompletely understood. We conducted an integrated multi-omics analysis to compare effects of acute vs. long-term exercise in healthy males.

Acute exercise induced transient responses, whereas repeated exercise triggered adaptive changes, notably reducing cellular senescence and inflammation and enhancing betaine metabolism. Exercise-driven betaine enrichment, partly mediated by renal biosynthesis, exerts geroprotective effects and rescues age-related health decline in mice.

Betaine binds to and inhibits TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1), retarding the kinetics of aging.

Betaine effectively alleviated senescence phenotypes by reduced senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-Gal)-positive cells, decreased p21 expression, lowered DNA damage indicator γ-H2A.X, and elevated heterochromatin mark H3K9me3. Betaine treatment also enhanced cellular antioxidant capacity, as evidenced by increased NRF2 phosphorylation and reduced ROS accumulation.

These findings systematically elucidate the molecular benefits of exercise, and position betaine as an exercise mimetic for healthy aging.”

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2025.06.001 “Systematic profiling reveals betaine as an exercise mimetic for geroprotection” (not freely available) Thanks to Dr. Weimin Ci for providing a copy.

Taurine and mitochondrial health

gettingwell4 4-5 stars Advanced knowledge, Immune system, Stress

A 2025 review subject was taurine’s beneficial effects on mitochondria:

“Taurine has multiple and complex functions in protecting mitochondria against oxidative-nitrosative stress. We introduce a novel potential role for taurine in protecting from deuterium (heavy hydrogen) toxicity. This can be of crucial impact to either normal or cancer cells that have highly different mitochondrial redox status.

Deuterium is an isotope of hydrogen with a neutron as well as a proton, making it about twice as heavy as hydrogen. We first explain the important role that the gut microbiome and gut sulfomucin barrier play in deuterium management. We describe synergistic effects of taurine in the gut to protect against deleterious accumulation of deuterium in mitochondria, which disrupts ATP synthesis by ATPase pumps.

Taurine’s derivatives, N-chlorotaurine (NCT) and N-bromotaurine (NBrT), produced through spontaneous reaction of taurine with hypochlorite and hypobromite, have fascinating regulatory roles to protect from oxidative stress and beyond. We describe how taurine could potentially alleviate deuterium stress, primarily through metabolic collaboration among various gut microflora to produce deuterium depleted nutrients and deuterium depleted water (DDW), and in this way protect against leaky gut barrier, inflammatory bowel disease, and colon cancer.

Taurine cannot be metabolized by human cells, but gut microbes are able to break it down to release sulfite, which then gets oxidized to sulfate anions that become available to support synthesis of sulfomucins. Taurine protects against many diseases linked to mitochondrial defects, such as aging, metabolic syndrome, cancer, cardiovascular diseases and neurological disorders.

We present a novel view that gut microbes play an essential role in providing deuterium depleted (deupleted) nutrients, especially, butyrate, to the host colonocytes forming the gut barrier. We propose that sulfomucins synthesized by goblet cells not only protect the barrier from pathogens, but also trap and sequester deuterium, thus reducing mitochondrial deuterium levels, resulting in improved mitochondrial health.

Due to taurine, redox buffer glutathione (GSH) further stabilizes the membrane potential. GSH not only reduces radical oxygen species (ROS) during oxidative stress, but it also assists in production of deupleted water in mitochondria.

Spontaneous oxidation of two GSH molecules to produce GSSG in the presence of hydrogen peroxide yields two molecules of DDW. Just as for glutathione, bilirubin can produce DDW indefinitely through chronic recycling between bilirubin and biliverdin, capturing a deupleted proton in NADPH to produce a DDW molecule in each cycle.

A novelty that arises from this investigation is introduction of the role that deuterium plays in mitochondrial disease, and ways in which taurine may facilitate maintenance of low deuterium in mitochondrial ATPase pumps. Excess deuterium causes a stutter in the pumps, which leads to inefficiencies in ATP production and an increase in ROS.”

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11717795/ “Taurine prevents mitochondrial dysfunction and protects mitochondria from reactive oxygen species and deuterium toxicity”

Stay away from NAC

gettingwell4 4-5 stars Advanced knowledge, Cortisol, Hypothalamus, Immune system, Limbic system, Neurochemicals, Stress

A 2025 rodent study added several reasons to avoid non-emergency use of N-acetylcysteine:

“We previously showed that antioxidants induced an impairment of negative feedback of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in rats, in parallel to a down-regulation of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) expression in the pituitary gland. This study evaluated the role of the Nrf2-heme-oxygenase-1 (HO-1) pathway on impairment of negative feedback of the HPA axis induced by N-acetylcysteine (NAC).

Male Swiss-Webster mice were orally supplemented with NAC for 5 consecutive days. The Nrf2-HO-1 pathway activator cobalt protoporphyrin IX (CoPPIX) was injected intraperitoneally on days 2 and 5 after starting NAC supplementation.

NAC reduced expression of Nrf2 in the pituitary of mice. NAC induced adrenal enlargement and hypercorticoidism, along with a decrease in GRα expression and an increase of GRβ expression in the pituitary gland.

We observed that dietary supplementation with NAC ( Figure 4A ) significantly increased plasma corticosterone levels in mice 24h ( Figure 4B ) as well as 15 days ( Figure 4C ) after the last administration of the antioxidant with the same magnitude of response (3.5-fold and 3.4-fold, respectively).

Chronic activation of the HPA axis can have damaging effects on immune, cardiovascular, metabolic, and neural functions, increasing the risk of immune system dysfunction, mood disorders, and metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. To prevent these deleterious effects of chronic hypercortisolism, HPA axis function is controlled by a glucocorticoid-dependent negative feedback system that is essential for ending the stress response.

These findings showed that NAC reduced Nrf2-HO-1 pathway activation in the pituitary gland, in a mechanism probably related to a local downregulation of GRα and an up-regulation of GRβ, leading to a failure of negative feedback of the HPA axis and consequently to the hyperactivity of this neuroendocrine axis.”

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11827418/ “Activation of the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway restores N-acetylcysteine-induced impairment of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis negative feedback by up-regulating GRα expression and down-regulating GRβ expression into pituitary glands”

A human equivalent to this study’s NAC dose is (150 mg x .081) x 70 kg = 851 mg. Human supplements are sold in 600 mg and 1000 mg doses.

Grok 3 replied to a question: Human equivalent time to 15 days in male Swiss-Webster mice aged between 4 and 6 weeks? by stating: “15 days in male Swiss-Webster mice aged 4 to 6 weeks corresponds to approximately 4.1 human years, advancing their equivalent human age from about 10–12 years to roughly 14–16 years.” Four+ years seems like a long time for NAC to steadily and continuously affect humans’ HPA axes per the above graphic. What do you think?

Previously mentioned reasons to avoid daily use of NAC were in the lower part of A good activity for bad weather days.

Sulforaphane as a senotherapy

gettingwell4 4-5 stars Advanced knowledge, Epigenetics, Immune system, Stress

A 2025 rodent study investigated cardioprotective effects of dasatinib / quercetin (a senolytic combination) and sulforaphane (senomorphic):

“Senolytics are molecules that selectively eliminate senescent cells (SCs). Senomorphics are drugs that suppress or mitigate the pro-inflammatory effects of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) without killing SCs. Senomorphics decrease the number of SCs by diminishing the paracrine effect of senescence induction in neighboring cells, and by enhancing elimination of SCs by the immune system, which reduces their harmful effects.

We used middle-aged female rats fed a hypercaloric diet (HD) from 21 days to 15 months of age. Under our experimental conditions, rats exhibited cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis, accumulation of senescent cells, changes in mitochondrial morphology, and oxidative stress. Rats were treated for 2 months with senolytic (dasatinib + quercetin, DQ) or senomorphic (sulforaphane, SFN) agents.

A novel aspect of recent research has been the crosstalk between organelles, particularly between the mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum (ER), through specialized contact sites (MERCSs). However, there is still no consensus on the optimal distance between MERCSs and their positive or negative effects on disease progression.

HD rats showed cardiac improvement after both treatments. Although both strategies improved cardiomyocyte size and cardiac fibrosis, only DQ decreased LDH levels, whereas SFN positively affected cardiac damage proteins.

In general, no changes in structure or damage-associated enzymes were observed in control rats treated with DQ or SFN, indicating that senotherapies do not promote adverse effects on the heart, reinforcing the concept that they are safe for application in the clinical field. Data suggest a possible link mechanism between Nrf2 activation and MERCSs preservation, activated by SFN rather than by the DQ combination, which allowed cardiac structure maintenance in HD rats decreasing harmful effects of senescent cells.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0955286325000865 “Cardioprotective effect of senotherapy in chronically obese middle-aged female rats may be mediated by a MERCSs/Nrf2 interaction” (not freely available) Thanks to Dr. Alejandro Silva for providing a copy.

The third phase of reversing aging and immunosenescent trends

gettingwell4 5+ stars Premium, Brain development, Epigenetics, Immune system , , , ,

Here’s a 2025 interview with Dr. Greg Fahy:

“We found that we could statistically demonstrate thymic regeneration morphologically on single individuals at single time points. MRI changes really are detecting shifts from the fatty tissue infiltration state of the involuted thymus to the regenerated thymus with functional thymic epithelial cells.

When you go through puberty your thymus involutes so you don’t have much left even when you’re 40. Essentially the process consists of loss of functional thymic mass and replacement of that functional thymic mass with adipose tissue, that’s what thymic involution is. It continues throughout life, but you retain a small amount of functional thymic mass all the way out to the age of 107.

The function of the thymus is to essentially manufacture half of your immune system. You have precursor cells arise from the bone marrow. They either go into the meiotic lineage and turn into the innate immune system, or you have the lymphocytic cells for what turns into T cells that enter the thymus and are educated in the thymus to grow up into newborn T cells and they’re released into the bloodstream.

The thymus has two jobs. It manufactures these lovely T cells without which you die but it also has a secondary finishing school. In the thymus cortex you manufacture all these lovely T cells but in the thymus medulla the T cells go to the medulla and if they don’t pass the second examination that they have to pass before they release into the body they’re all killed off. That second examination is: Do you reject self? As we get older, the thymus weakens in both the functions of making the T cells and screening out the ones that attack self. It stands to reason as we get older and the thymus’ influence wanes, we’re going to get more autoimmune disorders.

It took people a while to catch on to the fact that this involution problem is really a significant issue because the T cells that you made when you were 12, and even 20 and 40, they’re probably lasting until you’re 60. But at some point they don’t get replaced as fast as they’re going out of existence, and then your immune system goes off the cliff. Between the ages of 62 and 78 you lose 98% of your ability to recognize foreign antigens, and you still have a lot of capacity left.

We had nine guys in the first trial. Second trial we had 18 men 6 women and 2 controls that happen to be contemporaneous with that group. We have some more controls now that are either finished or or nearing completion. The second population was older than the first population by about nine years, but based on the epigenetic clocks that we looked at, they were starting off biologically younger.

On this last data analysis for Triim XA we looked at 21 different aging clocks. One aspect of the noise that we’re talking about is that biological aging as measured by some of these clocks is circadian. If you measure your age at 4:00 a.m. versus 11:00 a.m. you’re going to get a different result. It’s dynamic and there’s a trend and over time you change in a certain direction, but over any short period of time you can bounce around a little bit. The clocks predict your probability of cognitive dysfunction, they predict your probability of having impairments in your daily life, and they also predict your mortality.

We’re pretty much wrapping up that second clinical trial and going into the third. As we look at more data we understand more and more things and we see more and more things that we previously were not aware of. We began to look at a phenomena that may be responsible for limiting the magnitude of responses that we’re seeing limiting the aging reversal.

Triim-XD which is the next flavor of Triim-X is going to be looking at shifting biochemical pathways in such a way that it optimizes effects of these three medications that we’re giving people [human growth hormone, DHEA, and metformin] and prevents contradictions between them and prevents side effects of each one of these things. That’s about all I can tell you right now.”

Charts regarding the discussed item of how long effects may last are covered in The next phase of reversing aging and immunosenescent trends which was the last time I curated this research effort.

Practice what you preach, or shut up

gettingwell4 0-1 star Wasted resources, Acetylcholine, Amygdala, Anterior cingulate cortex, Beliefs, Brain development, Brain hemispheres, Brainstem, Cerebellum, Cerebrum, Cortisol, Dopamine, Epigenetics, Glutamate, Hippocampus, Hypothalamus, Immune system, Limbic system, Locus coeruleus, Lower brain, Memory, Neurochemicals, Serotonin, Stress, Thalamus , , , , , ,

A 2025 review subject was sulforaphane and brain health. This paper was the latest in a sequence where the retired lead author self-aggrandized his career by citing previous research.

He apparently doesn’t personally do what these research findings suggest people do. The lead author is a few weeks older than I am, and has completely white hair per an interview (Week 34 comments). I’ve had dark hair growing in (last week a barber said my dark hair was 90%) since Week 8 of eating broccoli sprouts every day, which is a side effect of ameliorating system-wide inflammation and oxidative stress.

If the lead author followed up with what his research investigated, he’d have dark hair, too. Unpigmented white hair and colored hair are both results of epigenetics.

Contrast this lack of personal follow-through of research findings with Dr. Goodenowe’s protocol where he compared extremely detailed personal brain measurements at 17 months and again at 31 months. He believes enough in his research findings to personally act on them, and demonstrate to others how personal agency can enhance a person’s life.

It’s every human’s choice whether or not we take responsibility for our own one precious life. I’ve read and curated on this blog many of this paper’s references. Five years ago for example:

So do more with their information than just read.

https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/17/8/1353 “Sulforaphane and Brain Health: From Pathways of Action to Effects on Specific Disorders”

Year Five of Changing to a youthful phenotype with sprouts

gettingwell4 4-5 stars Advanced knowledge, Epigenetics, Immune system, Memory, Stress

1. I’ve continued daily practices from Year Four to experience another year without being sick! I’ll get a set of Labcorp tests in a week to see if anything is sneaking up on me.

Really think that Brassica clinical trials should last years, not weeks. Once people get over the fact that broccoli, red cabbage, and mustard sprouts will never taste good because their compounds are plants’ defenses against predators, they’ll overlook that in favor of health benefits. Avena sativa oat sprouts don’t have a palatability problem.

2. Daily supplements have changed a little:

  • Started taking a quercetin supplement suggested in a comment to Year One as helpful for seasonal allergies (it doesn’t do that for me). Repeatedly rinsing and soaking the salt out of capers for quercetin content became too much of a nuisance, and the results didn’t always taste right;
  • Stopped taking Prodrome supplements because of unsustainable high costs;
  • Started taking Ovega 3 algae oil DHA 420 mg/EPA 140 mg twice a day in their place;
  • Substituted flax oil 1400 mg once a day for Balance oil;
  • Started taking 2 g magnesium L-threonate;
  • Upped taurine intake from 5 to 6 grams;
  • Upped D3 by 25 mcg to a daily 4400 IU;
  • Reduced chondroitin sulfate by 1.8 g since my joints are doing fine;
  • Stopped soy lecithin in favor of eating three raw eggs.

3. I injured my left shoulder in May 2024 by overdoing upper body exercises, and stopped seven months to recover. Gained thirty pounds during that layoff, and have worked off ten pounds with new routines since then.

I’m no longer dogmatic about aerobic exercise / beach walks. I’ll go over to the beach before sunrise when it isn’t raining or windy, or wait until the afternoon for weather to improve, rather than walk 30 minutes a day irregardless.

The largest cause of coincidences, Part 2

gettingwell4 4-5 stars Advanced knowledge, Immune system

Part 1 was informative, but this 2.5 hour interview with Dr. Suzanne Humphries provided a dozen times more information on health care and other subjects. Probably couldn’t have been on YouTube six months ago for more than a few minutes until it would have been censored.

I came across this interview by reading Why Is What We Feed Infants So Unhealthy?

“As I was finishing this article, Joe Rogan made the remarkable decision earlier this week to bring Suzanne Humphries onto his show to discuss the centuries of lies we’ve been told about vaccines (which amongst other things inspired this Substack) where she not only did that but also focused on the importance of breast feeding and the increased susceptibility formula fed infants have to vaccine injuries.”

I don’t specifically search for breast feeding topics, but my electronic services and devices seem to find them for me. Such as this suggestion: