A 2023 human / primate / rodent / worm study with 56 coauthors exhaustively investigated taurine effects:

“We measured the blood concentration of taurine during aging and investigated the effect of taurine supplementation on healthspan and lifespan in several species.

• In C57Bl/6J wild-type (WT) mice, serum taurine concentrations declined from 132.3 ± 14.2 ng/ml at 4 weeks to 40.2 ± 7.1 ng/ml at 56 weeks.
• In 15-year-old monkeys, serum taurine concentrations were 85% lower than in 5-year-old monkeys.
• Taurine concentrations in elderly humans were decreased by more than 80% compared with concentration in serum of younger individuals.

Regardless of their sex, taurine-fed mice survived longer than control mice. The median lifespan increase was 10 to 12%, and life expectancy at 28 months increased by 18 to 25%.

Improved survival of taurine-fed mice was not a consequence of low survival of control animals or differences in diet. Taurine deficiency is a driver of aging in mice because its reversal increases lifespan.

We investigated the health of taurine-fed middle-aged mice and found an improved functioning of bone, muscle, pancreas, brain, fat, gut, and immune system, indicating an overall increase in healthspan. Taurine reduced cellular senescence, protected against telomerase deficiency, suppressed mitochondrial dysfunction, decreased DNA damage, and attenuated inflammation.

An association analysis of metabolite clinical risk factors in humans showed that lower taurine, hypotaurine, and N-acetyltaurine concentrations were associated with adverse health, such as increased abdominal obesity, hypertension, inflammation, and prevalence of type 2 diabetes. We found that a bout of exercise increased concentrations of taurine metabolites in blood, which might partially underlie antiaging effects of exercise.

Taurine abundance decreases during aging. A reversal of this decline through taurine supplementation increases healthspan and lifespan in mice and worms, and healthspan in monkeys.”

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abn9257 “Taurine deficiency as a driver of aging”

---

One area curiously not investigated in this study was that taurine supplementation freed up cysteine to do things other than synthesize taurine, like synthesize glutathione, an idea in Treating psychopathological symptoms will somehow resolve causes? An introductory article brought up this point:

“One of the most studied mechanisms of action for taurine is an increase in antioxidant capacity. Although oxidative damage is not clearly linked to mammalian lifespan, it plays a role in many age-associated pathologies.

Taurine is a poor scavenger of reactive oxygen species, with the exception of hypochlorite, which it detoxifies to N-chlorotaurine. N-Chlorotaurine is anti-inflammatory and induces expression of antioxidant enzymes in mice and humans.

Taurine supplementation might also cause an increase in levels of its precursors, including the antioxidants hypotaurine and cysteine. An interesting corollary is that up-regulating endogenous taurine synthesis would have the opposite result—consuming hypotaurine and cysteine.”

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adi3025 “Taurine linked with healthy aging”

---

A human equivalent taurine dose is (1 g x .081) x 70 kg = 5.67 grams. Dose tests from supplementary data were:

“Dose and frequency of taurine administration was selected based on a pilot study, which showed that when given once daily to middle-aged WT mice, this regimen increased peak blood taurine concentrations to baseline concentrations in young (4-week-old) mice.”

I’ve taken 2 grams every day for the past three years, and will now bump that up to 5 grams. My diet doesn’t regularly include any foods high in taurine.

I recommend reading the study rather than commentaries. Its publisher did a very good job of linking figures so that images can be viewed, then the reader returned to the right context.

Gatekeepers are out in full force on this study, and their viewpoints are probably what you’ll see first, to include unevidenced statements like “the study’s main authors cautioned the public not to self-dose with the supplement” and the above introductory article’s unreferenced “equivalent doses used in the study by Singh et al. would be very high in humans.” Pretty pathetic that such ‘authorities’ are even publicized after recent years of deliberately misleading the world about science and medicine.

This study and all commentaries called for clinical trials that are NOT going to happen:

• Drug companies can’t make money from a research area that’s cheap, not patentable, and readily accessible.
• Government sponsors are likewise not incentivized to act in the public’s interest per their recent behavior.

Take responsibility for your own one precious life. See Part 2 for a sample of citing papers.