Polling vs. propaganda

An anonymous doctor’s perspective on what’s permitted to be publicly discussed regarding vaccine injuries:

“Only one polling organization independently investigated it, Rasmussen Reports (a conservative polling organization which has a reputation for getting accurate results due to them having listeners punch answers in response to an automated voice rather than directly talking to someone who may bias them). For American adults, they found:

  1. July 2021: 32% believed public health officials were lying about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.
  2. December 2022: 56% of 1000 respondents believed the vaccines were effective, 57% were concerned the vaccines had major side effects. Most importantly, 34% of those vaccinated reported minor side effects and 7% reported major side effects (e.g., those seriously impairing their quality of life).
  3. January 2023: 49% believed it is likely that side effects of COVID-19 vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths and 28% personally knew someone whose death may have been caused by side effects of the COVID-19 vaccines. 57% wanted Congress to investigate how the CDC handled assessing vaccine safety (presumably since many suspected the CDC had covered up the dangers of the COVID vaccination program).
  4. March 2023: 11% of those surveyed reported that they believed a member of their household died from COVID-19, while 10% believed a member of their household died and that their death may have been due to a side effect of the vaccine.
  5. September 2023: 47% of those surveyed stated they did not believe the vaccines were safe and 34% did not believe they were effective. As before, these results also politically stratified as Democrats were less likely to believe the vaccines were unsafe (14% D vs. 51% R) or ineffective (17% D vs. 57% R).
  6. November 2023: 24% personally knew someone they believe died from a COVID vaccine, and of those individuals, 69% would be likely to join a class action lawsuit against the pharmaceutical companies.
  7. January 2024: 53% believe it is likely that side effects of COVID-19 vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths and 24% personally knew someone whose death may have been caused by side effects of COVID-19 vaccines.
  8. September 2024: 55% surveyed believe it is likely that side effects of COVID-19 vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths – including 30% who say it’s very likely.
  9. November 2025: 26% reported they had minor side effects from the vaccine and 10% reported major side effects. Additionally, 46% believed it is likely that side effects of COVID-19 vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths – including 25% who say it’s very likely.

In short, the data shows you aren’t crazy, and while the news is not reporting it, the majority of people are seeing exactly the same thing you are. There is no getting around the fact a lot of people were harmed by these vaccines.”

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/polling-reveals-a-profound-shift “Polling Reveals A Profound Shift on Vaccines: We Can’t Let Pharma Bury It”


I knew two women who died in mid-2022 in their late sixties who probably had vaccine injuries contributing to their shortened lives. The subject wasn’t allowed to be discussed earlier this decade, and it largely still isn’t.

Everything this article says about covid vaccine injuries is applicable to the childhood vaccines. I found out at a house party earlier this week that both subjects are verboten, especially with women who have preschool children, despite their libertarian orientation.

Don’t know what will change public acknowledgement of vaccine harms. Isn’t it obvious that we were and are being lied to? Why still trust untrustworthy professions?

I thought at the beginning of this decade that people would soon see through the propaganda, but that didn’t happen. I also thought that public punishments for crimes against humanity would penetrate people’s awareness that we’d been duped, but the guilty still run free.

3 thoughts on “Polling vs. propaganda

  1. I’m actually a bit surprised the sentiments are shifting. I’d be curious if it’s due to critical thinking or increased tolerance of these types of discussions now that the crisis has passed. I suspect the latter…

    I consider myself so fortunate that I was skeptical and opted out of the vaccine. I can’t know for sure, but there are a lot of folks in my circle who developed turbo cancer within 3-6 months of vaccination or recurrence of a cancer that had been in remission for 20-40 years.

    I feel hopeful with RFK Jr. in office. No one has sued him over libel in “The Real Anthony Fauci,” which suggests a lot of terrifying things are true. I’m hoping his understanding of the lies/propaganda give him a foundation on which to do the opposite and rebuild trust. It’s shocking to me that I got by just fine on maybe a dozen vaccines and now some states required over 100 shots. It’s shocking and sad that the topic is taboo even within libertarian circles. It’s such an important thing to talk about, and something I’m sure every single mother of a young children is thinking about privately…

    • Yes, and this was in New Hampshire. The tendency for people to take a shortcut and believe a psyop is always there.
      A guy in the NH House of Representatives outside my conversation with mothers explained his rationale on voting for mandatory childhood vaccines was that otherwise we couldn’t achieve herd immunity. Of course, he never factually looked at the issues, and doesn’t have any children. It’s a trap that politicians fall into, voting for things they don’t have adequate knowledge of in order to be popular.
      What did you think about the article’s take on RFK Jr. being throttled even now based on what he didn’t say in his recent Rogan interview?

      • Yes, I think if politicians were asked questions the went to depth beyond the surface it would be clear most are terribly uninformed.

        I haven’t listened to the Rogan interview, so taking at face value that there were great opportunities to bring up vaccines, it seems it may be an intentional choice. Whenever RFK Jr. says anything about vaccines, the media is on him likes flies at a picnic taking clips out of context… like his admitting to doing drugs in a bathroom in the past, when the context was to highlight what a mistake is was to remove social support for addicts during covid. Vaccines safety, especially for children, was such a big part of his campaign so I don’t believe he would allow his message to be throttled; he’s taken actions to make the vaccine program more honest, transparent, and tailored to individual risk instead of pharmaceutical interests, so maybe there are studies going on in the background to better solidify his claims. Do you have any thoughts?

Leave a reply to gettingwell4 Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.