This 2023 rodent study by Our model clinical trial group investigated effects of broccoli seeds, 8-day-old sprouts, 95-day-old florets, and pure sulforaphane on glioma:

“This study employs a C6 rat glioma model to assess chemoprotective potential of aqueous extracts from broccoli seeds, sprouts, and inflorescences, all rich in sulforaphane (SFN), and pure SFN as positive control.

In plant material, seeds and sprouts exhibited a heightened concentration of aliphatic-type glucosinolates (GSLs), while broccoli heads showcased a more substantial amount of indole group GSLs. Similar to the GSL trend, the highest concentration of phenolic compounds was evident in sprouts, succeeded by seeds, with broccoli heads exhibiting a subsequent lower content.

Within freeze-dried aqueous extracts obtained from plant material samples, seeds exhibited the most substantial SFN content, trailed by sprouts and inflorescences. This hierarchy aligns with precursor GSL content, specifically glucoraphanin (GRA). These outcomes imply that approximately 5% of GRA content converted into SFN.

Sinapic acid derivatives emerged as the primary category of phenolic compounds. Higher concentrations of these phenolic compounds were observed in inflorescences, succeeded by seeds, and lastly, broccoli sprouts.

Aqueous extracts from seeds, sprouts, and inflorescences were administered to rats over 30 days before the introduction of C6-glioma cells. This specific time frame corresponds to a critical risk factor and initiation of the tumor niche in humans. The objective was to assess whether this consumption could protect against tumor development.

Tumor volume within the control SS group significantly increased compared to the sprout group. Volume fluctuations observed in the seed and inflorescence groups did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences when compared to the control group.

Subjects administered with 0.1 mg/kg of SFN displayed a notable decrease in tumor growth. A stark contrast is evident when compared to the corresponding control group (control OO) and the 0.7 mg/kg SFN-treated group.

These findings substantiate the notion that elevated doses of the pure compound might potentially assume a pro-oxidant role, while lower doses hold promise in fostering an environment rich in antioxidants and conducive to chemoprotection.

All experimental groups developed gliomas. However, the group administered with aqueous extract of broccoli sprouts and the group treated with pure SFN at 0.1 mg/kg exhibited formation of diffuse low-grade gliomas. Conversely, the remaining groups exhibited malignant characteristics, and manifested development of thrombosed vessels.

Incorporating broccoli sprouts into one’s regular diet emerges as a highly promising strategy for averting onset of specific types of cancer. It is the most cost-effective option for society when contrasted with consumption of nutraceuticals. While achieving a standardized effective dose of SFN via food consumption, such as sprouts, poses challenges, forthcoming clinical studies are poised to determine an appropriate dosage for shaping human intervention trials.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0753332223015184 “The preventive effects of broccoli bioactives against cancer: Evidence from a validated rat glioma model”

---

This study’s Discussion section had a lot of hand waving regarding broccoli seeds’ failure to outperform broccoli sprouts despite its 1.06 mg/kg to 0.63 mg/kg sulforaphane advantage. Although not specifically referenced, hormetic effects described in Sulforaphane in the Goldilocks zone and subsequent studies probably account for pure sulforaphane’s dose / response findings that 0.1 mg/kg better inhibited glioma than did 0.7 mg/kg.

For those who think this post’s title is over-the-top:

• Although eating non-patentable broccoli sprouts is safe and cheap, how many people will wait for clinical trials to determine whether these rodent findings translate to humans?
• If today there was already human clinical trial evidence confirming translatable findings, how many people would still wait for incorruptible, morally upright, honest, and trusted medical authorities’ approvals?

---