A 2026 rodent study investigated sulforaphane’s ability to affect ALS-like symptoms:

“The objective of this study was to evaluate neuroprotective efficacy and safety of sulforaphane (SUFP) in a methylmercury (MMHg⁺)-induced preclinical rat model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). ALS is characterized by progressive motor neuron degeneration and muscle wasting, leading to impairments in gait, swallowing, salivation, and routine motor activities.

64 animals were classified into eight groups: 1st: normal control, 2nd: vehicle control; 3rd: SUFP perse (4 mg/kg, i.p.), 4th: MMHg + (5 mg/kg, p.o.), 5th: MMHg + 5 + SUFP (2 mg/kg, i.p.), 6th: MMHg+ 5 + SUFP (4 mg/kg, i.p.), 7th: MMHg+ 5 + omaveloxolone (OVX) (30 mg/kg, i.p.), and 8th: MMHg + 5 + dimethyl fumarate (DIMT) (50 mg/kg, i.p.). Neurotoxin MMHg + was orally administered at 5 mg/kg for the first 21 days. For the next 22 days, SUFP, OVX, and DIMT were administered intraperitoneally (i.p.).

SUFP modulates neurotransmitter levels such as acetylcholine (A), dopamine (B), GABA (C), glutamate (D), and serotonin (E).

SUFP4 exerted broad neuroprotective effects in ALS pathology by restoring antioxidant proteins (Nrf2, HO-1, SIRT1), suppressing apoptotic (Bax, caspase-3, Bcl-2) and inflammatory markers (TNF-α, IL-1β), and enhancing the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. It also downregulated stress-related signaling pathways (PI3K/Akt, p75NTRECD, MAPKs) associated with neurodegeneration. These molecular effects translated into meaningful functional recovery, as evidenced by improvements in grip strength, locomotor performance, spatial memory, and depressive-like behavior.

Histopathological evaluation demonstrated attenuation of demyelination and preservation of neuronal architecture including the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, striatum, midbrain, and cerebellum. Beyond central neuroprotection, SUFP exerted systemic benefits by normalizing hepatic enzymes, improving skeletal muscle integrity, restoring redox balance, stabilizing neurofilament and myelin-associated proteins, and correcting hematological alterations.

Despite limitations related to study duration and animal sex, this work strongly positions SUFP as a promising, multi-target therapeutic candidate for ALS with both neural and systemic protective efficacy.”

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12035-026-05683-5 “Sulforaphane-Mediated Multitarget Therapeutic Effects in Methylmercury-Induced ALS-Like Pathology: Comparative Analysis and Multifaceted Approach to Neuroprotection and Systemic Recovery” (not freely available) Thanks to Dr. Sidharth Mehan for providing a copy.

---

Unlike A Nrf2 treatment for ALS?, this study didn’t present evidence that its treatment compound was effective for preventing ALS. For one thing, currently-known disease factors involving heat shock proteins and associated genes, some of which are Nrf2 targets, weren’t investigated.

Two Nrf2 activators were used in both studies as comparators of Nrf2 activation effects. Neither omaveloxolone nor dimethyl fumarate are ALS causal treatments, though, and have undesirable side effects.

A human equivalent of this study’s higher sulforaphane dose is ((4 mg x .162) x 70 kg) = 45 mg. 45 mg of sulforaphane might be too much to consistently take at one time because of unpalatability. But I documented taking an estimated 52 mg for a year during 2020-2021 by eating microwaved 3-day-old broccoli sprouts twice a day.

---